No, no. There's a huge difference between a wolf leading to a dog and what evolutionary theory perpetrates as fact. The former involves one kind begetting something different but of the same kind (also in some cases a loss of DNA information). The latter (evolutionary theory) is something of one kind begetting something altogether different.
I provided a link discussing micro and macro evolution. Please refer to the link I provided.
Also, the Archaeopteryx isn't good evidence for evolution but a Chinese fake. It's sad that you guys cling to such things as truth.
Archaeopteryx - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I know I linked Wikipedia, but if you have any doubts, just look at the sources near the bottom.
Lol the science you intentionally ignore!
Talking to you is hard, because you essentially put your fingers in your ears, close your eyes, and shout "THERE IS NO PROOF, THERE IS NO PROOF" whenever I provide the evidence and it's staring you in the face waving flags saying, "HERE I AM", with a full orchestra in the background and neon signs pointing towards it.
The proofs I have seen for Old Earth are mostly unprovable theories and/or methods all ready disproven
The only reason you believe this is because you've listened to frauds. You are ignorant of actual science. What you perceive as actual science is just Kent Hovind or Ken Ham spewing absolute lies.
some like carbon dating got disproven years ago lol.
I'm assuming you're referring to the fact that carbon dating has yielded tremendously flawed dates. The thing is, scientists understand that these flaws exist, and more importantly, they understand WHY these flaws exist. Being aware of why the flaws exist allows scientists to know when to use carbon dating, and when they shouldn't use carbon dating.
(This video contains mild profanity)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbvMB57evy4
Carbon dating isn't the only dating method scientists use. There are numerous dating methods out there and multiple dating methods are used on fossils to determine their age as to obtain a more accurate estimation.
The proof of this is written throughout all history and in archaeology with the fact people even exist and had written record and thus history lol
You mean the written accounts declaring Ra to be real? Declaring Apollo as the God who raised the sun into the sky? Much of what we find are legends and myths. More reliable than written words is geology.
Science by just asking questions can actually help us realize past the misinterpretations of others inthe past. Take evolution and fossils for instance, if I say the earth is billions of years old like the modern western scientific mythology proposes and went through all the theoretical catastrophes and ages they also propose; how is it life forms that exist even today are still present and were not wiped out, or the fossils show different variant of animals that are similar in overall form to those of today?
A good place to start is to actually study evolution.
Also during the many proposed theoretical catastrophe events and ages that would have drastically destroyed life; would it not also even vastly altered and tainted all evidence of the ages prior and thus rendered it impossible to date the earth's age?
I'm curious as to what catastrophes you're referring to. I'm also curious where you got the idea that all catastrophes must wipe out all of life.