It doesn't matter if your beliefs align with objective metaphysical reality or fail to. I don't care if you think the
Christian worldview is no different than the pagan worldview of
Borneo headhunters in your obviously false, illogical, relativistic outlook.
The bottom line here is that you need to respect the human rights of Christians instead of seeking to use the government to deprive Christians of their humans rights and persecute them when they refuse to surrender their human rights which are not given them by the United Nations but Creator God.
Immoral laws and laws that injure the moral can and should be nullified and changed. Specifically, immoral laws that seek to deprive moral people and their religious organizations of their God given normative morality and persecute them for not surrendering it on behalf of immoral groups of people SHOULD be nullified and changed.
If you get a lot of immoral people to pass a blatantly immoral law that seeks to force me to condone, facilitate, engage in, or partner with immorality: I'm going to break your law because, as I have explained repeatedly but your elevator apparently doesn't go past the first floor so try to press the second floor button once in a while just to see what happens, you used a governmental de facto power to create an immoral law that is in violation with Creator God's de jure supreme, eternal, normative, moral law putting me in a position where I HAVE to break your de facto immoral law to align with Creator God's de jure moral law which supersedes your de facto authority (and immoral law).
This is authoritatively true no matter where I (or my religious association or organization) am geographically or politically located.
And the Supreme Court of the U.S. agrees, as they should, and as I explained to you repeatedly in their recent ruling. Note their terminology: "not only preaching but teaching and carrying out a religious group’s mission."
This means Obama's unilateral executive order in conflict with recent Supreme Court ruling for it bars religious organizations from "carrying out a religious group's mission [on or off their private property]" by forcing them to deny their mission and accept his redefined mission for them which is to seek out, hire, and promote individuals whose beliefs and immoral behaviors run counter to the religious group's mission and normative morality... the very heart of the Supreme Court ruling that religious organizations (e.g. churches, religious schools, religious employers) cannot be deprived in that way under the Constitution of the United States whether or not Obama says so or not.
Since this isn't rocket science, at some point, I imagine it will at least begin to sink in.