J
jcspartan
Guest
Heh... I can only guess that you made a bit of a typo there.
Excellent point.
Ooops Yeah sure it was a typo
Heh... I can only guess that you made a bit of a typo there.
Excellent point.
Good grief, Cup, you are raving like a lunatic. Science is not satantic.
I said Coperican heliocentricty is satanic in origin, science agrees with geocentricty I have shown, why do you bear false testimony?
I did say I checked, there were two disinfo's circulated, so a spent two minutes verifying, then was guided by the spirit of truth which revealed the error of both mainstream accounts, the only conclusion was that it was a meteor, which is the truth, so now you've been told the truth, you laugh at it, that is not wise but very foolish.
Are you avoiding giving out where you got you information from?
you spent a whole two minutes verifying??....really??
So what you are saying is that The Spirit of Truth led you to believe that everyone who witnessed this event actually saw a meteor crashing into the moon and not spacecraft fired from earth?....why don't you research how long NASA spent planning this event or do you think a devious plan was suddenly sprung into action as soon as it was discovered that there was a meteor that was going to crash into the moon and they knew exactly where to tell everyone where to point their telescopes and at what time it would happen?
"It is like a mustard seed, which is the smallest seed you plant in the ground." -Mark 4:31
I read once read a story in a magazine for Christian teenagers. A non-Christian told a Christian that Jesus said the mustard seed was the smallest of all seeds, but that an orchid seed is even smaller. Does that mean that Jesus didn't know what he was talking about. The point of the story is that you don't have to know all the answers, but it raises a good point. Should we deny the existence of any smaller seeds because of what Jesus said?
Jesus wasn't out to tell people that he knew everything, he was out to tell people vital things in a way they'd understand. So, when he said the mustard seed is the smallest seed what I think he meant was that the mustard seed was the smallest seed any of his listeners were familiar with. I mean, if it's true that orchid seeds are smaller, how many of his disciples were in the business of planting orchids????
LeI'm writing a book right now, it's like a devotion book, when I eventually finish it I'll have a clergyman review it. In fact, I'll open it to the scrutiny of as many Christians who've studied the Bible at a graduate level that would be willing to read it. Why? Because I desperately, desperately, don't want anything I write in that book to be contrary to the Bible lest someone who reads it would be lead astray.
"It is like a mustard seed, which is the smallest seed you plant in the ground." -Mark 4:31
I read once read a story in a magazine for Christian teenagers. A non-Christian told a Christian that Jesus said the mustard seed was the smallest of all seeds, but that an orchid seed is even smaller. Does that mean that Jesus didn't know what he was talking about. The point of the story is that you don't have to know all the answers, but it raises a good point. Should we deny the existence of any smaller seeds because of what Jesus said?
Jesus wasn't out to tell people that he knew everything, he was out to tell people vital things in a way they'd understand. So, when he said the mustard seed is the smallest seed what I think he meant was that the mustard seed was the smallest seed any of his listeners were familiar with. I mean, if it's true that orchid seeds are smaller, how many of his disciples were in the business of planting orchids????
I'm more that likely going to get an earful of scientific jargon, but when a rocket/shuttle is launched into space, why is it's trajectory always in an arc? is it not due to the earths rotation??
Good illustration. I am going to plagerize it in the future.![]()
Feel free. If you want to give credit I read it in Brio which is a publication of Focus on the Family, FYI.
But seriously though, he concedes that his position is contrary to science because he said that science is satanic, but his position is weak from a Biblical standpoint too. But when I or anyone else poses questions that challenge his interpretation of the Bible, he just sidesteps them.
I think this is probably all just a big joke to him.
I'm more that likely going to get an earful of scientific jargon, but when a rocket/shuttle is launched into space, why is it's trajectory always in an arc? is it not due to the earths rotation??
No, your just made false testimony, you said that I said that 'science is satanic', this is a lie, I never said that, I said 'Copernicus heliocentricity is of satanic origin', which it is, it is against Biblical scripture.
I think this is probably all just a big joke to him.
Cup, if you believe that scripture is absolutely correct on all matters of science then your view of the world will look something like this image.