Baptism Essential to Salvation

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
Go, Go Go on with your bad self full of Doctrine that has brought works as the way to be saved by getting water Baptized. you make a mockery of the cross of Christ and the free gift od new life in Spirit and truth by the resurrected Christ where we are made alive by Father in Spirit and truth
You are adding to the whole truth and causing work to take the place of Faith,
You show me your works that has caused your Faith
And i will show you God's faith that has caused my love for all, whether anyone agrees with me or not

Ephesians 2:8
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

You reject the gift when you make it a command. A command is not willingly done by the one that is commanded. You make my Father to be a tyrant and my Father, the Father of Christ is not
By Mercy we are saved, and then we do willingly in thankfulness and never by force, do you see this?

Eph 2:8------------faith>>>>>>>>>>saves
1Pet3:21----------baptism>>>>>>>>saves


Since there is just one way to be sved, no alternatives, then faith includes baptism. Again, who in Acts 2 were the ones being saved?
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
You are kidding right, you don't see who is speaking, Okay then deny all you want. I ,pray for your blessing, happiness and prosperity in God, delivering you to God to be straightened out and me as well trusting God to straighten out me as well to any error I may have

In the context John is speaking to Pharisees, not you nor me.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
Yep, Baptism agreed not water though, Spirit which apparently I am getting you don't see and are a man of works for salvation. not a man of faith that father gives the ones that believe and willingly get water Baptized as a good conscience between them and God, not between one and their Church

The eunuch was water baptized which is the one baptism in effect per Eph 4:5. The eunuch's water baptism is Christ's baptism of the great commission, Mt 28:19,20; Mk 16:15,16 that had humans/disciples administering water baptism. So there is just one baptism in effect and we see the eunuch being water baptized with that one baptism.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
Right here read listen to waht the Spirit of God says, lets see, not caring to argue, so if you want truth to access here it is

Philippians 3 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

3 Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe. [SUP]2 [/SUP]Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision.( and water Baptizers) [SUP]3[/SUP]For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh. [SUP]4 [/SUP]Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: [SUP]5 [/SUP]circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; [SUP]6 [/SUP]concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless. [SUP]7 [/SUP]But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ. [SUP]8 [/SUP]Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, [SUP]9[/SUP]and be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith: [SUP]10 [/SUP]that I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death; [SUP]11 [/SUP]if by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.

What you posted here does not tell how one gets into the death of Christ. You are avoiding Rom 6:4 that says one is BAPTIZED into the death of Christ.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
What you posted here does not tell how one gets into the death of Christ. You are avoiding Rom 6:4 that says one is BAPTIZED into the death of Christ.
Rom 6 has no water. It is baptized into Christ, not into water. Co-crucifixion with Christ is a blessed truth for the believer -- not for the one who dismisses the Savior as a mere "chance-giver."

Baptism itself is only rarely associated with salvation. Water baptism never saves. It is a human work. Eph 2 forbids human works as a means of salvation. Spirit baptism is not a human work; it is something the Lord does to every believer.

As faith/believe is the only "MUST-I-DO" given for salvation, and as faith/believe is reiterated over and over as man's responsibility in salvation, and that in a host of passages where believe/faith is the only thing listed, faith in the real Christ is the only essential action on man's part for salvation.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
The eunuch was water baptized which is the one baptism in effect per Eph 4:5. The eunuch's water baptism is Christ's baptism of the great commission, Mt 28:19,20; Mk 16:15,16 that had humans/disciples administering water baptism. So there is just one baptism in effect and we see the eunuch being water baptized with that one baptism.
Eph 4 indicates that all Christians have one baptism, the same for all Christians (not counting baptisms, but indicating same). The one baptism they have is Spirit baptism, for some Christians have never been water baptised, yet they are saved as Acts 16 indicates.

What MUST-I-DO to be saved?
Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, & you shall be saved.

There is only one MUST-I-DO: believe.

But as to Bible baptisms, there are more than 1:
1) water baptism
2) spirit baptism (I baptise you with water . . . He shall baptize you with the Spirit)
spirit baptism was yet future in Acts 1 "not many days hence."
3) Christ's death was a baptism for him.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
Once an atheist comes to believe in the existence of God, in heaven and hell, realizes he is lost and needs to repent and be saved, then he can choose to repent and believe the gospel. As long as an atheist does not even believe in the existence of God, in heaven or hell, does not realize he is lost and needs to be saved through faith in Christ, then he won't repent.
You have already said one repents BEFORE he believes now you are saying the atheist must believe then repent.

mailmandan said:
An atheist can "change their mind" and now believe that God exists, but that is not enough to save him. The new direction of this change of mind must include faith in Christ in order for him to be saved (Ephesians 2:8). So an unbelieving person once convicted that God exists can now choose to repent and believe the gospel. There is a difference between believing "mental assent" that God exists (even the demons believe that - James 2:19) and believing the gospel - trusting in Christ's finished work of redemption as the all sufficient means of their salvation (Romans 1:16).
No reason for an unbelieving atheist to change his mind while in unbelief.


mailmandan said:
One must believe in God before they can repent and believe the gospel. It's true that there are people who believe that God exists but will not repent and believe the gospel. There are many professing Christians today who believe "mental assent" in Christ but their trust and reliance is in "water and works." That is not saving faith in Christ. That is faith in water and works and not Christ alone. We must trust exclusively in Christ for salvation in order to be saved. Unfortunately, most trust in works.



Repent and believe the gospel (Mark 1:15). Why do you reverse the order? Once a person repents "changes their mind" and believes the gospel/trusts in Christ's finished work of redemption as the all sufficient means of their salvation, why do they still need to repent in order to become saved? Paul said in Romans 1:16 - For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ for it is the power of God unto salvation for everyone who BELIEVES.. So those who believe the gospel are still lost and still need to repent in order to become saved? Is that what you are saying?



Sure, they must first believe that Jesus is the Messiah before they can repent and place their faith in Him for salvation.
You posted: One must believe in God before they can repent and believe the gospel.

Before you were arguing one must repent THEN believe, now you have reversed your course on this.


mailmandan said:
Again, in Acts 2:38, "for the remission of sins" does not refer back to both clauses, "you all repent" and "each one of you be baptized," but refers only to the first. Peter is saying "repent unto the remission of your sins," the same as in Acts 3:19. The clause "each one of you be baptized" is parenthetical. The church of Christ teaches that water baptism was not necessary for salvation under the old law, but is necessary for salvation under the new law. Under the new law, in Acts 2:38, we read - "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and under the old law, in Mark 1:4 and Luke 3:3, we read - John came baptizing in the wilderness and preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. I'm hearing the same message under the old law. So in Mark 1:4 and Luke 3:3 (under the old law), was this baptism of repentance "FOR" (in order to obtain) the remission of sins or "FOR" (in reference to; in regards to) the remission of sins? In Matthew 3:11, we read: I baptize you with water "FOR" repentance. If translated "in order to obtain", the verse does not make sense. I baptize you with water "FOR" (in order to obtain) repentance? or I baptize you with water "FOR" (in reference to - in regards to) repentance?



Whoever believes in Him will receive remission of sins (Acts 10:43). These Gentiles believed, received the Holy Spirit and the remission of sins (vs. 44-47) BEFORE they were water baptized (vs. 48). They received the Holy Spirit when they believed on the Lord Jesus Christ BEFORE water baptism. Compare with Acts 16:31 - Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved.



Acts 2:38, Acts 3:19--------Repent>>>>>>>>>baptism/parenthetical>>>>>remission of sins.



1 Peter 3:21------baptism saves/not the removal of dirt from the flesh (that is, not as an outward, physical act which washes dirt from the body--that is not the part which saves you), "but an appeal to God for a good conscience" (that is, as an inward, spiritual transaction between God and the individual, a transaction that is symbolized by the outward ceremony of water baptism). We could paraphrase Peter's statement by saying, "Baptism now saves you--not the outward physical ceremony of baptism but the inward spiritual reality which baptism represents." You need to read it all.



You are trying to force the rest of scripture to conform to your bias doctrine of water salvation. Repentance and believing in Him comes BEFORE remission of sins (Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18) and baptism comes AFTER remission of sins (Acts 10:48). The remission of sins is signified, yet not procured in the waters of baptism.



Again, i
n Acts 2:38, "for the remission of sins" does not refer back to both clauses, "you all repent" and "each one of you be baptized," but refers only to the first. Peter is saying "repent unto the remission of your sins," the same as in Acts 3:19. The clause "each one of you be baptized" is parenthetical.



So repentance and remission of sins (Luke 24:47); repent and be converted so that your sins may be blotted out (Acts 3:19); ..repentance unto life (Acts 11:18) means still lost? When one truly repents the new direction of this change of mind is faith in Christ. Such a person is saved. Water baptism is symbolic of Christ's death, and being buried with Him by baptism into death is signified, yet not procured in water baptism. A
symbol (water baptism) is not the reality (Spirit baptism), but the picture of the reality.



Circumcision made without hands, "
circumcision is that which is of the heart, by the Spirit," (see - Romans 2:29). Spirit baptism is the reality (made without hands) and water baptism is the picture of the reality.



Spirit baptism is the reality and water baptism is the picture of the reality. For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body.. (1 Corinthians 12:13). Confusing the picture with the reality has caused a lot of confusion in your theology.
In what sense are we water baptized "into Christ?" In the same sense that the Israelites were baptized "into Moses" (metaphorically) indicating their oneness, or solidarity, with him as their leader (1 Corinthians 10:2) just as through water baptism we indicate our oneness, or solidarity with Christ as our Savior. Now does 1 Corinthians 10:2 teach that the Israelites were literally water baptized into the body of Moses? Absolutely not.



This is Spirit baptism, not water baptism. At what moment does this occur? Ephesians 1:13 -
In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation - having also believed, (repent and believe the gospel) you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise. BEFORE water baptism (Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18).



Paul uses this same phrase in Romans 10:13 to describe someone receiving Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior:

“Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”

And notice that nowhere in Romans 10 is water baptism even mentioned. In regards to Acts 22:16 it should be noted that the "calling" used in this passage is a aorist participle in the Greek, which means that its action (the action of "calling on the name of the Lord") precedes the action of the main verb in the sentence of "be baptized." In other words, a literal translation of the verse is, "Arise, get yourself baptized and your sins washed away, calling on His name."

Thus, we get our sins washed away by calling on the name of Jesus Christ, not by water baptism. Once again, "water" baptism is a sign or symbol that follows the salvation of the believer, not the cause of it.



Acts 2:38-----------repent>>>>>>baptized/parenthetical>>>>>>for remission of sins.
Acts 3:19----------repent>>>>>>be converted>>>>>>sins blotted out.
Mark 1:15---------repent>>>>>>believe the gospel>>>>>>saved.
Romans 1:16------gospel>>>>>>power of God unto salvation>>>>>>believes.
Acts 10:43---------believes>>>>>remission of sins.



One accepts the gospel by believing/trusting in Christ's finished work of redemption as the all sufficient means of their salvation. One gets baptized BECAUSE he has accepted the gospel and has been converted. You have it backwards.



Believed does not include baptism. You don't baptize unbelievers in order to make them believers. Belief is not baptism and belief precedes baptism and we are saved through belief/faith (John 3:15,16,18; Acts 10:43; 13:39; 16:31; Romans 3:22-28; 4:5; Ephesians 2:8 etc..). It's just that simple. Not hard to understand, just hard for you to ACCEPT. If water baptism was absolutely required for salvation, then God would not make so many statements in which He promises salvation to those who simply BELIEVE. The gospel is hid to those who don't BELIEVE (2 Corinthians 4:3,4).



Baptism in Acts 2:38 is parenthetical. Repentance is unto the remission of sins (Acts 3:19). In Mark 16:16, it's the lack of belief that causes condemnation, not the lack of baptism. The remission of sins/salvation is signified, yet not procured in water baptism. Acts 2:38 and Mark 16:16 do not change the order of events in Acts 10:43-48 or Acts 11:17,18 or Acts 15:8,9. Believing, receiving the Holy Spirit and the remission of sins comes BEFORE water baptism.



Faith saves and faith is not baptism.
Baptism-----not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God, through the resurrection of Christ saves, not the mechanical act of water baptism.



No, faith is not baptism and faith precedes baptism and we are saved through faith. It's just that simple. When will you believe? In Acts 15:7, Peter said - And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: "Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe. 8 So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, 9 and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. Peter said nothing about water baptism here. What word stands alone in verses 7 and 9 in connection with hear the word of the gospel and hearts purified by what? Baptism or FAITH? Believers do not get water baptized with a dead faith. The faith of believers is alive before, during and after water baptism. You are confused by what James means by "faith only." He means an empty profession of faith (James 2:14). What good is it if someone says he has faith but has no works. A bare profession of faith is not a living faith but a dead faith. Man is saved through faith and not by works, yet genuine faith is confirmed by good works.
[/QUOTE]

I will not take the rest of my day responding to all of this but the singular-plural argument on Acts 2:38 is not valid argument as I already shown. Bottom line, the conjunction "and" will not allow you to separate "repent" from "baptized" as you are trying so hard to do. If baptism is not for remission of sins then the "and" means repentance is not for remission of sins.

Here is what Greek scholars have to say about the singular-plural of Acts 2:38 - with many if not all of those scholars not believing water baptism saves:

Actually, I think your friend confused an old argument that is based on the tense (second and third person). David Padfield wrote about this on his website:
Another smoke screen often used to get around Acts 2:38 is the argument that since the words "repent" and "be baptized" are different in both person and number in the original text, the phrase "for the remission of sins" cannot refer to both verbs.


A few years ago I wrote to several prominent Greek scholars to see if the above line of reasoning was valid. The question I sent to them was as follows: "Is it grammatically possible that the phrase 'eis aphesin hamartion,' 'for the remission of sins,' as used in Acts 2:38, expresses the force of both verbs, 'repent ye and be baptized each one of you,' even though these verbs differ in both person and number?" The following men responded to my inquiry. I will give their qualifications along with their response to my question.


Bruce Metzger was the editor of the Textual Commentary on The Greek New Testament,published by the United Bible Societies. He is currently teaching at Princeton Theological Seminary in New Jersey. He wrote, "In reply to your recent inquiry may I say that, in my view, the phrase 'eis aphesin hamartion' in Acts 2:38 applies in sense to both of the preceding verbs."


F. W. Gingrich was a professor of New Testament Greek at Albright College in Reading, Pennsylvania. Gingrich, along with William Arndt, published A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature in 1957. He wrote, "The difference in person and number of 'repent' and 'be baptized' is caused by the fact that 'repent' is a direct address in the second person plural, while 'be baptized' is governed by the subject 'every one of you' and so is third person singular. 'Every one of you' is, of course, a collective noun."


Arthur L. Farstad was the chairman of the New King James Executive Review Committee and general editor of the NKJV New Testament. The NKJV was translated by over 120 Greek scholars, many of whom teach in Baptist schools. He wrote, "Since the expression 'eis aphesin hamartion' is a prepositional phrase with no verbal endings or singular or plural endings. I certainly agree that grammatically it can go with both repentance and baptism. In fact, I would think that it does go with both of them."


John R. Werner is the International Consultant in Translation to the Wycliffe Bible Translators. He was also a consultant to Friberg and Friberg with the Analytical Greek New Testament. From 1962 to 1972 he was professor of Greek at Trinity Christian College. He said, "Whenever two verbs are connected by kai 'and' and then followed by a modifier (such as a prepositional phrase, as in Acts 2:38), it is grammatically possible that modifier modifies either both the verbs, or only the latter one. This is because there is no punctuation in the ancient manuscripts, so we don't know whether the author intended to pause between the first verb and the 'and.' It does not matter that, here in Acts 2:38, one of the verbs is second person plural ("y'all") and the other is third-person singular ("is to"). They are both imperative, and the fact that they are joined by kai 'and' is sufficient evidence that the author may have regarded them as a single unit to which his modifier applied."


Barclay Newman and Eugene Nida edited The Translator's Handbook On The Acts Of The Apostles. This book, published by the United Bible Societies, says on page 60: "So that your sins will be forgiven (literally 'into a forgiveness of your sins') in the Greek may express either purpose or result; but the large majority of translators understand it as indicating purpose. The phrase modifies both main verbs: turn away from your sins and be baptized."


Let me try expressing this in another way. We have two things being joined together with "and:" the first is "repent" (second person plural in Greek) and "each one of you" (second person plural in Greek). The second phrase is qualified by "be baptized" (third person singular). The change in case is because the "be baptized" is modifying a second person plural phrase. The preposition "for the remission of sins" has no case and thus applies to both "repent" and "each one of you be baptized" equally. If you argue that it should be "for the remission of your sins" then the case is second person plural, but this again applies to both "repent" and "each one of you be baptized" because they are second person plural word and phrase.
http://lavistachurchofchrist.org/LVanswers/2007/03-17d.htm

So baptism in Acts 2:38 is not "parenthectical as you are trying to make it.

 
Last edited:

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,281
6,567
113
Here are just a few passages mentioning baptism. There are many more........

Mat 3:13 Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to the Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him. Mar 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that disbelieveth shall be condemned.

Joh 3:22 After these things came Jesus and his disciples into the land of Judea; and there he tarried with them, and baptized. ye, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ unto the remission of your sins; and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

Act 2:41 They then that received his word were baptized: and there were added unto them in that day about three thousand souls.

Act 8:12 But when they believed Philip preaching good tidings concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.

Act 8:13 And Simon also himself believed: and being baptized, he continued with Philip; and beholding signs and great miracles wrought, he was amazed.

Act 8:36 And as they went on the way, they came unto a certain water; and the eunuch saith, Behold, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
This is a long thread, so I haven't gone through every single post, so tell me if these points have been previously made.

The essentials of salvation must be present in every situation where salvation occurs in Scripture,
otherwise it is not an ESSENTIAL.

The tests for this are done by going through the groups of those who have been saved, and comparing them. The group's are:
1. The pre-Abrahamic Covenant saints
2. The Abrahamic Covenant saints
3. The Mosaic Covenant saints
4. The Jewish New Covenant saints
5. The Gentile New Covenant saints
6. The "thief on the cross" type saints (deathbed saints)

God's grace through faith is the single common thread through them all.
It is the essential.

Anything else is simply and expression of faith, which comes through maturity in Christ. But even a 'babe in Christ' is still IN CHRIST.

How do you get around the fact that faith, grace, the blood of Christ are not specifically present in all verses/texts that deal with salvation?
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
Everyone knows what Yeshua, Jesus, said to the thief crucified with Him. He was not baptized, but he believed.

One should be baptized calling on the name of our Lord, Yeshua, for remission of sins, but we see by His own words it is not always necessary for salvation.

---The thief lived died and was promised paradise while under the OT law therefore is not an example of NT salvation.

---There is no proof the thief was never baptized.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Eph 4 Spriit Baptism, not Water Baptism, is Salvific

In Eph 4, the apostle is not counting baptisms, but saying that all Christians have the same baptism. The one baptism that all Christians have is Spirit baptism, not water baptism. 1 Cor 12:13 indicates that all Christians have Spirit baptism. They do not all have water baptism.

The one Must-I-Do to become a Christian is believe on the Lord Jesus Christ (Acts 16).

Occasionally a man may believe in Christ as Savior, yet die before he is baptised, as apparently was the case with the thief on the cross. All believers should report to the water to be dipped (baptised). But in fact many are never dipped, but only sprinkled (which is not what baptizo means at all).

Water baptism is clearly distinguished from Spirit baptism, which was yet future in Acts 1 (not many days hence). That makes 2 baptisms.

There is a 3rd baptism mentioned, a special baptism which Christ suffered, which appears to refer to the crucifixion. But this 3rd baptism is something that some apostles would also endure. My explanation is that when a Christian is baptised by the Spirit & put into the Body of Christ, that accomplishes so intimate a union that the believer is said to have been baptised into Christ (Rom 6) and thus co-crucified, co-raised, and seated with Christ in Him in Heaven.
Gal 2 says "I have been crucified with Christ."

I take it that when one is baptised into the Body of Christ, that unites the believer with Christ's cross-baptism. And thus I understand this scripture:



But Jesus said unto them, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink the cup that I drink? or to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? And they said unto him, We are able. And Jesus said unto them, The cup that I drink ye shall drink; and with the baptism that I am baptized withal shall ye be baptized:

--------------------



I indeed baptize you in water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you in the Holy Spirit and in fire:


Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to the Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him. But John would have hindered him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me?


And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway from the water: and lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove, and coming upon him;


Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit:


John came, who baptized in the wilderness and preached the baptism of repentance unto remission of sins. And there went out unto him all the country of Judaea, and all they of Jerusalem; and they were baptized of him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.


I baptized you in water; but he shall baptize you in the Holy Spirit.


And it came to pass in those days, that Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee, and was baptized of John in the Jordan.


And king Herod heard thereof; for his name had become known: and he said, John the Baptizer is risen from the dead, and therefore do these powers work in him.


And she went out, and said unto her mother, What shall I ask? And she said, The head of John the Baptizer.


But Jesus said unto them, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink the cup that I drink? or to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? And they said unto him, We are able. And Jesus said unto them, The cup that I drink ye shall drink; and with the baptism that I am baptized withal shall ye be baptized:


He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that disbelieveth shall be condemned.


He said therefore to the multitudes that went out to be baptized of him, Ye offspring of vipers, who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?


And there came also publicans to be baptized, and they said unto him, Teacher, what must we do?


John answered, saying unto them all, I indeed baptize you with water; but there cometh he that is mightier than I, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: he shall baptize you in the Holy Spirit and in fire:


Now it came to pass, when all the people were baptized, that, Jesus also having been baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened,


And all the people when they heard, and the publicans, justified God, being baptized with the baptism of John. But the Pharisees and the lawyers rejected for themselves the counsel of God, being not baptized of him.


But I have a baptism to be baptized with; and how am I straitened till it be accomplished!


And they asked him, and said unto him, Why then baptizest thou, if thou art not the Christ, neither Elijah, neither the prophet? John answered them, saying, I baptize in water: in the midst of you standeth one whom ye know not,


These things were done in Bethany beyond the Jordan, where John was baptizing.


And I knew him not; but that he should be made manifest to Israel, for this cause came I baptizing in water.


And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize in water, he said unto me, Upon whomsoever thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and abiding upon him, the same is he that baptizeth in the Holy Spirit.


After these things came Jesus and his disciples into the land of Judea; and there he tarried with them, and baptized. And John also was baptizing in Enon near to Salim, because there was much water there: and they came, and were baptized.


When therefore the Lord knew that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus was making and baptizing more disciples than John (although Jesus himself baptized not, but his disciples),


And he went away again beyond the Jordan into the place where John was at the first baptizing; and there he abode.


for John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized in the Holy Spirit not many days hence.


And Peter said unto them, Repent ye, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ unto the remission of your sins; and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.


They then that received his word were baptized: and there were added unto them in that day about three thousand souls.


But when they believed Philip preaching good tidings concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. And Simon also himself believed: and being baptized, he continued with Philip; and beholding signs and great miracles wrought, he was amazed.


for as yet it was fallen upon none of them: only they had been baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus.


And as they went on the way, they came unto a certain water; and the eunuch saith, Behold, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they both went down into the water, both Philip and the eunuch, and he baptized him.


And straightway there fell from his eyes as it were scales, and he received his sight; and he arose and was baptized;


Can any man forbid the water, that these should not be baptized, who have received the Holy Spirit as well as we? And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.


And I remembered the word of the Lord, how he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized in the Holy Spirit.


And when she was baptized, and her household, she besought us, saying, If ye have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house, and abide there. And she constrained us.


And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, immediately.


And Crispus, the ruler of the synagogue, believed in the Lord with all his house; and many of the Corinthians hearing believed, and were baptized.


And he said, Into what then were ye baptized? And they said, Into John’s baptism. And Paul said, John baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people that they should believe on him that should come after him, that is, on Jesus. And when they heard this, they were baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus.


And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on his name.


Or are ye ignorant that all we who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?


Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized into the name of Paul? I thank God that I baptized none of you, save Crispus and Gaius; lest any man should say that ye were baptized into my name. And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other. For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not in wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made void.


and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;


For in one Spirit were we all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether bond or free; and were all made to drink of one Spirit.


Else what shall they do that are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why then are they baptized for them?


For as many of you as were baptized into Christ did put on Christ.
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,281
6,567
113
Do you hear yourself? Was not Yeshua baptized by John along with a myraid of others to repentance? I will not argue this point. The words in the Word speak for themselves. Please do not, again, try to pick a debate out of something self-evident.

---The thief lived died and was promised paradise while under the OT law therefore is not an example of NT salvation.

---There is no proof the thief was never baptized.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
I get that. It is sad. When we are told to do something by man, when actually it is God who should be leading us. And no, I think the act itself does not save you but it sure does change a few things in your life - but only, and a big ONLY, if God was present at your baptism! I think sometimes it is just an act in front of man, because man (or the church) said you must do it.
God is the one that commanded water baptism. The fact God commanded makes it necessary if for no other reason.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Eph 4 One Baptism

"ye were called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is over all, and through all, and in all."

Ye were called. All called believers have one & the same baptism. That one baptism is the Baptism of the Spirit, which all believers have (1 Cor 12:13).

Water baptism is not something all have -- lots of sprinklers out there who don't baptise (dip) at all. Some may die before getting dipped.

Also there is a 3rd baptism, which Christ endured (& also some apostles), evidently at the cross. So Eph 4 is not totally the baptisms of the Bible, but referring to the 1 baptism that all Christians have, namely Spirit baptism.


 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
There are many instances in the Word when people received the Holy Spirit, and were later baptized. The reverse holds true also. I received the Holy Spirit first, and later, out of obedience, I was baptized. I do not see folks wanting to avoid immersion in these threads; I see genuine desire to learn about the subject.

The case of Cornelius does not change the order of verses as Acts 2:38 and Mk 16;16 that put baptism BEFORE salvation else one is creating contradictions among verses.

Baptism with the HS does not save/remit sins and it had nothing to do with Cornelious' personal salvation, but God used that baptism to prove to the Jews that salvation was not for them alone but was to go to the Gentiles also.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
Remember when that thief hung next to Jesus? What did Jesus say to him? And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise. Though, I don't know if he was baptized or not.

Check this out:
Luke 23:43 Jesus answered him, "Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise."
(Read the commentaries at the bottom)

The thief is not a valid argument for he lived and died under the OT law and therefore is not an example of NT salvation.
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,281
6,567
113
Your desire for confrontatin is only exceeded by you lack of hearing others. What I shared is from the Word and not intended to set a fire. Please, if you do not wish to hear others, do not answer to what they post. I will now say good bye for a while. May God bless you with an understanding heart, patience and love, amen.

The case of Cornelius does not change the order of verses as Acts 2:38 and Mk 16;16 that put baptism BEFORE salvation else one is creating contradictions among verses.

Baptism with the HS does not save/remit sins and it had nothing to do with Cornelious' personal salvation, but God used that baptism to prove to the Jews that salvation was not for them alone but was to go to the Gentiles also.
 
J

Joh-Anne

Guest
I love you guys! Are you agreeing or disagreeing with each other?
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
You have already said one repents BEFORE he believes now you are saying the atheist must believe then repent.
The only repentence that saves is change of mind from unbelief to belief.

Arthur L. Farstad was the chairman of the New King James Executive Review Committee and general editor of the NKJV New Testament. The NKJV was translated by over 120 Greek scholars, many of whom teach in Baptist schools. He wrote, "Since the expression 'eis aphesin hamartion' is a prepositional phrase with no verbal endings or singular or plural endings. I certainly agree that grammatically it can go with both repentance and baptism. In fact, I would think that it does go with both of them."

So baptism in Acts 2:38 is not "parenthectical as you are trying to make it.

Quoting persons with your opinion proves nothing. Your "so" is illogical, an ad hominem argument.

The statement "if A & B, then C results" does not prove which was essential, A or B. If you chop off a man's head & stick him with a pin, he will die. But that doesn't prove that the pin was necessary.

But Art Fahrstad was a personal friend of mine, & I am sure that he did not believe that water baptism saved at all. I met with him in the church that met in his home & went out to eat with him at a restaurant on a weekly basis.

Baptism cannot be essential to salvation as salvation is offered so many, many times just for believing. Acts 2:38 makes best sense as referring to Spirit baptism. No water is mentioned & Spirit baptism is in context.

Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved.

Belief as the sole condition is given time after time. Baptism passages in salvation context are rare.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
Rom 6 has no water. It is baptized into Christ, not into water. Co-crucifixion with Christ is a blessed truth for the believer -- not for the one who dismisses the Savior as a mere "chance-giver."

Baptism itself is only rarely associated with salvation. Water baptism never saves. It is a human work. Eph 2 forbids human works as a means of salvation. Spirit baptism is not a human work; it is something the Lord does to every believer.

As faith/believe is the only "MUST-I-DO" given for salvation, and as faith/believe is reiterated over and over as man's responsibility in salvation, and that in a host of passages where believe/faith is the only thing listed, faith in the real Christ is the only essential action on man's part for salvation.

Rom 6 says nothing about a "spirit baptism".

Rom 6 is the one baptism of Eph 4:5 which is a literal immersion in water, the baptism of Christ's great commission that involved humans/disciples administering water baptism. The baptism in Rom 6 involves a "burial" that one is "raised up from" which would indicate a burial in water from which one is raised up from to walk in newness of life.

Water baptism is what they obeyed from the heart Rom 6;17,18, where then they were justified. One can obey God's command to be water baptized, yet God never commanded anyone to be baptized with the HS for that baptism was only a promise made to the apostles in Acts 1;1-5. So no one can obey a promise made to another person.

In Rom 6;17,18 obeying by being water baptized, then they were FREED from sin.

Rom 6:7 says For he that is dead is freed from sin.

Water baptism is where the old man of sins dies and is buried freeing the one being baptized from those sins where he then rises to walk in newness of life.

Rom 6:8 Now if we be dead with Christ

So it is in water baptism that one is dead with Christ freeing him from sins/justified.


Faith only ior baptism with the HS is not to be found in any of this in Rom 6.