No, while I am sure you have heard this verse before, you are going to need to hear it again: For Scripture says, baptism saves us as an answer of a good conscience toward God; Baptism does NOT save us from the filth of the flesh (i.e. sin).
1 Peter 3:21
"The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:"
For we are saved, not by any righteousness that we had done, but we are saved by the washing and renewing of the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:5).
Peter said "
baptism doth also now save us" So it cannot be anymore clear that God has chosen water baptism as the means by which He saves men. Nothing in the rest of verse 21 changes the fact that baptism saves. After Peter tells us baptism saves, he then tells us what water baptism is NOT for and what water baptism is for. Water baptism is NOT like taking a bath where one washes dirt off his flesh. What water baptism is for, it is an
answer of a good conscience toward God. Baptism is the point were sins are remitted, washed away by the blood of Christ. So when one has been water baptized and washed away his sins he can have a good conscience toward God.
In Acts 2, Peter convicted his listeners of the sin of crucifying the Messiah. Those that heard and believed what Peter said, it made their conscience guilty of that sin so much so they asked Peter "
what shall we do?" The "
answer" Peter gave them for their guilty conscience of sin was the command to repent and be baptized for the remission of sins. Being water baptized for remission of sins is the answer for their guilty conscience so they can then have a good conscience towards God.
Tts 3:5 speaks of the water baptism of the new birth:
Jn 3:5-----------spirit+++++++++
born of water>>>>>>>>>>>in the kingdom
1Cor12:13-------spirit++++++++++
baptized>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in the body
Tts 3:5--------Holy Ghost+++++
washing of regen.>>>>>>>>>saved
All there verses say the same thing, it takes the Spirit and water baptism to be saved/in the kingdom/in the body.
Note how Paul
CONTRASTS our own righteousness we have done
FROM the obedience in being water baptized/washing of regeneration. Paul makes this same contrast in Rom 10:3
For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have NOT submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. Those Jews were lost for they were doing their OWN righteousness and NOT doing GOD'S righteousness.
Some people do not see the difference between a man doing
HIS OWN righteousness and doing
GOD'S righteousness.
A man doing his OWN righteousness, his own good works cannot merit salvation so one must do God's rightesousness. Psa 119:172 says all of God's commandments are righteousness. So when one obeys God he is doing
GOD'S righteousness not his
own righteousness. As John said in 1 Jn "he that doeth righteousness is righteous" and
NOT he that doeth righeousness is a legalist.
1 Jn 1:7,10
Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous....In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.
Jason0047 said:
The Bible does not have to specifically say a special name that we are familar with in the Bible in order for it to be spoken about in the Bible. There are many words and concepts we use today that are not specifically mentioned in the Bible. The Bible does not talk about the "Conditional Salvation" by name, but it is a concept that exists within the Scriptures none the less. Legalism is not about abiding with God's Spirit whereby He does the good work within you. Legalism is the over emphasis on man's works to save himself rather than repenting of one's sins and and trusting in the grace of Jesus Christ so as to be cleansed. It is trust in His grace as being 100% sufficient rather than what we do. In John 6:28-29, Jesus was asked the question, what must they do in order to do the works of God? Jesus did not give them a long list of things to do. Instead, Jesus essentially said believe in Him.
Legalism or legalist is not in the bible. What happens is people define this word according to their own bias and misapply that biased definition to the bible. Some will argue that the Pharisees were legalists. The Pharisees were condemned for hypocrisy, condemned fro replacing their traditions for God's law but the Pharisees were NEVER condemned for following/obeying God's word. In fact, they were condemned over and over for NOT obeying God's word
Jaon0047 said:
For example: Take Luke 18:9-14: Who was more justified before God? Was it the Tax Collector (Publican) who cried out to God to have mercy on him in the fact that he was a sinner? Or was it the Pharisee who did many wonderful things and thought he was better than other people (Such as the Tax Collector)?
For the thief on the cross was saved without water baptism.
These are two examples of those under the OT law and not under Christ's NT gospel.
[There is no proof the thief had never been baptized.]
Jason0047 said:
Now, of course, you are going to say that this was in a different Covenant. But you have to understand that no one was saved ever by keeping the Law. Not even in the Old Testament. Everyone was saved by having a born again (or circumcised in heart) faith. Including Abraham. A life of holiness and fruitful works is simply the result of having a transformed heart and the proof that God lives within them. For if God made it harder for others to be saved by following a set of rules to be saved versus trusting and repenting of one's sins (Which is easier), then God would be a respector of persons.
People were condemned for NOT keeping God's law.
Duet 28:45
Moreover all these curses shall come upon thee, and shall pursue thee, and overtake thee, till thou be destroyed; because thou hearkenedst not unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which he commanded thee:
1 Kings 9:6,7
But if ye shall at all turn from following me, ye or your children, and will not keep my commandments and my statutes which I have set before you, but go and serve other gods, and worship them Then will I cut off Israel out of the land which I have given them; and this house, which I have hallowed for my name, will I cast out of my sight; and Israel shall be a proverb and a byword among all people.
Psa 89:30-32
If his children forsake my law, and walk not in my judgments; If they break my statutes, and keep not my commandments; Then will I visit their transgression with the rod, and their iniquity with stripes
Even in the NT Jesus said "
If ye love me, KEEP MY COMMANDMENTS. Who will be saved that does not love Christ by not keeping His commandments? None.
Jason0047 said:
No, my friend. Please do not take this the wrong way, but you are falsely labelling "God's will" into a list of things that the Bible does not say we have to do in order to be saved. One naturally obeys God's will when they are saved. Works are are merely the effect of salvation and works are not the cause for one's salvation.
It is God's will that men obey the gospel by believing, Jn 8:24; repenting, Lk 13:3,5 confession, Mt 10:32,33 and be baptized, Mk 16:16 to be saved.
God, who cannot lie, cannot break His promises has promised to save those that
obey, Heb 5:9 and have vengeance upon the that
OBEY NOT the gospel of Christ.
So the question remains, if obeying God's law is legalism and not obeying God's law is sin/disobedience/unrighteousness with God taking vengeance upon those that "obey not" then what is a man to do?