Gods Mercy,Why the Jews are Still Gods Chosen People

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Are you aware that the word church as it is translated is NOT in the Greek text? The apostles NEVER had the concept of a body that REPLACED believing Israel. You can't find it in scripture. All scripture states is that UNBELIEVING Israel was cut off with the Gentiles being grafted in with believing Israel. And the Gentiles are JOINT HEIRS with believing Israel. And as JOINT heirs ALL BELIEVERS will receive the same promises through Christ.

so the gentiles, because they repented of their sins against God, and their adultry against him, will possess the land of canaan and live in peace?

Wow. its has been 2000 years now. Why are we not their in peace?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I've provided you God's answer many times. You're final reply was enough for me...
You straight out admitted that your idea has nothing to do with the Gospel, and that Jesus isn't reigning as King, what have I to do with you?

(Gal 1:6)
I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
(Gal 1:7)
Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
(Gal 1:8)
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
(Gal 1:9)
As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.


No, you continue to say it is a gospel. But you refuse to show how it was a gospel. Thus you are just like your catholic brother. Alot of hot air. and no proof. When your confronted with a point you have to answer, You never do. And you expect us to listen to you.



When you want to speak of the things of God, and then say you aren't interested in the part about Jesus reigning as King, and you don't want to talk about the Gospel, but some freak side show physical thing you are hung up on because you don't know scriptures, it becomes pointless to cast pearls before swine. Goodbye
If you want to speak about the gospel. I would love to. Feel free to open a thread about it.

But this thread is not about the gospel. it is about a promise to a nation. Which you have been confronted with, and asked numerous times to show HOW IT IS PART OF THE GOSPEL.

time and time again you refuse. So I must ask.

1. why do you refuse?
2. Why are you in a room which is a discussion about 1 promise, which has NOTHING to do with the gospel. and try to push it to a gospel discussion?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Because one passage 'agrees' with the other does not necessarily means it fulfills it.

And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written, After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up: That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.
(Act 15:15-17)
they have to spiritualize so many OT prophets which has not been fulfilled. it is all they have, otherwise they would have to admit their error.

that is why the roman church went outside the word of God, and deny it as soul authority in the first place. Because they can not use the word to prove their point, and have to spiritualise so many things to FORCE fulfiment of them, because thier is no literal fulfilment.

It is what the roman hatred of the jewish nation caused.
 
Nov 3, 2014
1,045
5
0
My comment as I look at the recent postings above

I see that few ever post the very significant scriptures that tell of Israel's continuance as a national people while all the nations of the Gentiles will come to an ending ..... there are many

Instead the arguments avoid the same and are scattered, fragmented, and of no substance .... what a futile disturbance

I will say the Revelation's evidence the 144000 of the children of Israel present during the tribulation should be enough alone .... but some just ignore the plain truth

I see a real disconnect inherent in those on this forum that claim to be "Christian" and yet display spirit revealed reality

And by the way the Lord always has good reason for choosing His revealings ..... the tribes of Dan and Manasseh are missing in Revelation 7:1-8 for a reason

Dan was the vanguard tribe that first lead Israel into idolatry and Ephraim is considered to be a subset of Joseph

And both not on the listing appear in Ezekiel 48 .... which is totally ignored by those that attempt to preach their replacement theology ..... this obvious apportionment of land for Israel in the Lord's coming millennial kingdom is a subject of just about every spurious way exercised to discount the Lord's word on the matter

The next tricks are to either claim that the 144000 are of the Gentile "church", or that the passage is only symbolic and has no literal application

This kind if insidious twisting and fools play is evidence of people that are tampering with the Lord's Word for some reason

Study yourselves approved Christians so that you are not drawn into worthless babbling about such matters
 

Markum1972

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2013
1,165
32
48
I am not changing anything.
The twelve tribes of Israel are Jews. No gentiles make up the twelve tribes, so this is not changing things.
The falsehood would be thinking that gentiles will be apart of the 144,000 and the right to judge also taking away the chosen elect of the Jews as God's people.

The Jews have not been replaced by others in this instance, so the twelve tribes of Israel and the twelve Jewish tribes are one in the same.

They haven't been replaced?

Then explain why Dan is not in the list but Manasseh is.

Jews are of the bloodline of Abraham. Certainly you must know that. You must also know that Manasseh is NOT of the bloodline of Abraham. So according to you, Manesseh cannot be a tribe of Israel.

So if Manasseh is not Jew or Gentile, then what obscure list do they fit in (since Manesseh is not Jew and you stated that there are no tribes that are Gentile)?

Are you suggesting that was a typo in Revelation? That "Dan" was supposed to be in the place of "Manasseh"?

Since you seem to be making the appearance of being an authority on the identity of Israel, then I ask you this... who was the other tribe, other than Manasseh, to be adopted in that was NOT of the bloodline of Abraham? Then explain how either that tribe or Manasseh could have been considered a tribe of Israel since you define Israel as being Jews (bloodline of Abraham). I am very curious to see how you have rationalized this.

What scriptures do you have to support such an error as saying that Manasseh is not really a tribe of Israel because they are not of the bloodline of Abraham?
 

Markum1972

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2013
1,165
32
48
My comment as I look at the recent postings above

I see that few ever post the very significant scriptures that tell of Israel's continuance as a national people while all the nations of the Gentiles will come to an ending ..... there are many

Instead the arguments avoid the same and are scattered, fragmented, and of no substance .... what a futile disturbance

I will say the Revelation's evidence the 144000 of the children of Israel present during the tribulation should be enough alone .... but some just ignore the plain truth

I see a real disconnect inherent in those on this forum that claim to be "Christian" and yet display spirit revealed reality

And by the way the Lord always has good reason for choosing His revealings ..... the tribes of Dan and Manasseh are missing in Revelation 7:1-8 for a reason

Dan was the vanguard tribe that first lead Israel into idolatry and Ephraim is considered to be a subset of Joseph

And both not on the listing appear in Ezekiel 48 .... which is totally ignored by those that attempt to preach their replacement theology ..... this obvious apportionment of land for Israel in the Lord's coming millennial kingdom is a subject of just about every spurious way exercised to discount the Lord's word on the matter

The next tricks are to either claim that the 144000 are of the Gentile "church", or that the passage is only symbolic and has no literal application

This kind if insidious twisting and fools play is evidence of people that are tampering with the Lord's Word for some reason

Study yourselves approved Christians so that you are not drawn into worthless babbling about such matters
Yes! Thank you for that. I hope people hear you on this. However, I do think you meant to say that Dan and Ephraim are missing from Revelation 7; not Manasseh. Simple mistake though (especially since Ephraim and Manasseh have something very important in common). The message is the same.
 
Last edited:
K

kennethcadwell

Guest

They haven't been replaced?

Then explain why Dan is not in the list but Manasseh is.

Jews are of the bloodline of Abraham. Certainly you must know that. You must also know that Manasseh is NOT of the bloodline of Abraham. So according to you, Manesseh cannot be a tribe of Israel.

So if Manasseh is not Jew or Gentile, then what obscure list do they fit in (since Manesseh is not Jew and you stated that there are no tribes that are Gentile)?

Are you suggesting that was a typo in Revelation? That "Dan" was supposed to be in the place of "Manasseh"?

Since you seem to be making the appearance of being an authority on the identity of Israel, then I ask you this... who was the other tribe, other than Manasseh, to be adopted in that was NOT of the bloodline of Abraham? Then explain how either that tribe or Manasseh could have been considered a tribe of Israel since you define Israel as being Jews (bloodline of Abraham). I am very curious to see how you have rationalized this.

What scriptures do you have to support such an error as saying that Manasseh is not really a tribe of Israel because they are not of the bloodline of Abraham?

Revelation makes it clear that the 144,000 are from the 12 Jewish tribes, there is no mistaken that.
It clearly shows that in chapter 7 and in chapter 14 shows them with the Lord.
In chapter 7 verse 9 it talks about the rest of us. The great multitude that nobody could number.

Jews are still the elect, and our Lord says to bless them and you will be blessed. Curse them and you will be cursed.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest

They haven't been replaced?

Then explain why Dan is not in the list but Manasseh is.

Jews are of the bloodline of Abraham. Certainly you must know that. You must also know that Manasseh is NOT of the bloodline of Abraham. So according to you, Manesseh cannot be a tribe of Israel.

So if Manasseh is not Jew or Gentile, then what obscure list do they fit in (since Manesseh is not Jew and you stated that there are no tribes that are Gentile)?

Are you suggesting that was a typo in Revelation? That "Dan" was supposed to be in the place of "Manasseh"?

Since you seem to be making the appearance of being an authority on the identity of Israel, then I ask you this... who was the other tribe, other than Manasseh, to be adopted in that was NOT of the bloodline of Abraham? Then explain how either that tribe or Manasseh could have been considered a tribe of Israel since you define Israel as being Jews (bloodline of Abraham). I am very curious to see how you have rationalized this.

What scriptures do you have to support such an error as saying that Manasseh is not really a tribe of Israel because they are not of the bloodline of Abraham?
if I may..


1. We can not know what dan is not mentioned, he is mentioned in ezekial as recieving part of his inheritance.
2. Manassah is a son of Joseph, Again it is not known why ephram is not mentioned and jospeh is, All we need to know is God knows. and do not question it.
3. It is people of the nation (sons) of Jacob, Or Israel. Not gentiles. we know this, because starting in vs 9 johns sees many (so great which no one can number..ie much more than 144000, from every nation tribe and tongue which were saved during this great tribulation time period.

the question we must ask, Just like im romans 11. Why is God separating people from the nation of Israel (who are still scattered) from Gentiles, in this passage, if we are not to separate them, and think these 144000 have gentiles incuded in them..
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
Now, in answer to your questions, Dan seems to have been replaced in the list by Manasseh. I do not know if we can be certain why Dan was left out, but I can think of some possibilities. Maybe it was because of any or all of these things that the people of the tribe of Dan did or failed to do:

  • had difficulty taking possession of their territory (Joshua 19:47; Judges 18:1),
  • took an "ephod, other household gods, a carved image, and a cast idol" (Judges 18:14,17,18),
  • attacked and overcame "a peaceful and unsuspecting people" (18:27), and
  • set up the idols and their own priests in their new city (18:30,31).
Also, King Jeroboam set up two golden calves in Bethel and in Dan, which "became a sin"; people went to Dan to worship there (1 Kings 12:28-30). So, possibly because of their hot-headedness and idol worship, Dan will be left out of the 144,000 who will receive the seal of God.As for Ephraim, he was Joseph's son. Jacob blessed Ephraim and put him ahead of his brother Manasseh (Genesis 48:17-20), meaning that Ephraim received Joseph's birthright (seebirthrights). For all intents and purposes, then, Ephraim is "hidden" in the list by simply being part of the tribe of Joseph.
Perhaps another explanation why Ephraim is not in the list can be found in Psalms:
The men of Ephraim, though armed with bows, turned back on the day of battle; they did not keep God's covenant and refused to live by his law. They forgot what he had done, the wonders he had shown them. He did miracles in the sight of their fathers in the land of Egypt, in the region of Zoan. He divided the sea and led them through; he made the water stand firm like a wall. He guided them with the cloud by day and with light from the fire all night. He split the rocks in the desert and gave them water as abundant as the seas; he brought streams out of a rocky crag and made water flow down like rivers. But they continued to sin against him, rebelling in the desert against the Most High. ... Then the Lord awoke as from sleep, as a man wakes from the stupor of wine. He beat back his enemies; he put them to everlasting shame. Then he rejected the tents of Joseph, he did not choose the tribe of Ephraim (Psalm 78:9-17,65-67).​
Hosea wrote this:
Ephraim will be laid waste on the day of reckoning. Among the tribes of Israel I proclaim what is certain. ... Ephraim is oppressed, trampled in judgment, intent on pursuing idols (Hosea 5:9,11)​
 
Oct 24, 2014
595
14
0
What this scripture is saying is that when the time comes for all of us to stand before the judgment seat.
Those who are Jews will be judged by the original twelve Apostles minus Judas, as we know by scripture he will not be in heaven. They were given the special right to sit on thrones and judge the rest of the Jews, as for gentiles though we have but one judge. The Lord Jesus Christ.

No gentiles are given any special thrones to sit on to judge other gentiles.
Noted.
But I believe the verse is saying we are "saved in the washing of regeneration by the Holy Spirit".

(Tit 3:5)
Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
they have to spiritualize so many OT prophets which has not been fulfilled. it is all they have, otherwise they would have to admit their error.

that is why the roman church went outside the word of God, and deny it as soul authority in the first place. Because they can not use the word to prove their point, and have to spiritualise so many things to FORCE fulfiment of them, because thier is no literal fulfilment.

It is what the roman hatred of the jewish nation caused.
Sure, spiritualize, reinterpret, then usurp.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Noted.
But I believe the verse is saying we are "saved in the washing of regeneration by the Holy Spirit".

(Tit 3:5)
Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

Yes, it was the act of God washing, and renewing us to new life by the blood of CHrist
 
Oct 24, 2014
595
14
0
Because one passage 'agrees' with the other does not necessarily means it fulfills it.

And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written, After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up: That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.
(Act 15:15-17)
So James isn't making the point that the breach was healed by Jews and Gentiles being one and dwelling in peace together in Jesus Christ?
You actually don't see that James is quoting Amos in Fulfillment? As ALL OTHER OT prophecies are?

(Act 15:11)
But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.
(Act 15:14)
Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
(Act 15:15)
And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,
(Act 15:16)
After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up:
(Act 15:17)
That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.

(Amo 9:11)
In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old:

You don't SEE that??


 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
So James isn't making the point that the breach was healed by Jews and Gentiles being one and dwelling in peace together in Jesus Christ?
You actually don't see that James is quoting Amos in Fulfillment? As ALL OTHER OT prophecies are?

(Act 15:11)
But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.
(Act 15:14)
Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
(Act 15:15)
And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,
(Act 15:16)
After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up:
(Act 15:17)
That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.

(Amo 9:11)
In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old:

You don't SEE that??

it says 'agree', not 'fulfill'. It would help if you could prove a one-to-one correspondance with those two words.

"and I will build it as in the days of old:"...not happened.
The topic is the inclusion of the Gentiles, that is proved by James quoting the prophets.
 

Markum1972

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2013
1,165
32
48
Revelation makes it clear that the 144,000 are from the 12 Jewish tribes, there is no mistaken that.
It clearly shows that in chapter 7 and in chapter 14 shows them with the Lord.
In chapter 7 verse 9 it talks about the rest of us. The great multitude that nobody could number.

Jews are still the elect, and our Lord says to bless them and you will be blessed. Curse them and you will be cursed.
You still have not explained why Manasseh is in the list if what you are saying is true.

And no... the scripture does NOT say Jews. It says 12 tribes of Israel. You are insisting it says other than it says. You will not find one scripture that says they are Jews. You changed it.

What it says is...

And I heard the number of them which were sealed:

Scriptures tells us clearly who they are...

Revelation 14:1 And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads.
2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps:
3 And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.
4These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.

John 1:29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
 
Last edited:
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You still have not explained why Manasseh is in the list if what you are saying is true.

And no... the scripture does NOT say Jews. It says 12 tribes of Israel. You are insisting it says other than it says. You will not find one scripture that says they are Jews. You changed it.

What it says is...

And I heard the number of them which were sealed:

Scriptures tells us clearly who they are...

Revelation 14:1 And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads.
2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps:
3 And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.
4These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.

John 1:29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
you need to continue. You can not ignore the fact it says they are children of Israel. I can agree we should not call them jews, But it still tells us who they are. We can not say it is gentiles. or it would not be broken up the way it was.
 
Nov 3, 2014
1,045
5
0
The first saved of the tribulation they are .... and they are mortals who will need to be sealed for protection from the wiles of the tribulation

Then the Lord will lead them to take His gospel first to Israel and then to the nations of the Gentiles during the tribulation .... 144000 apostles [Matthew 24: 14] .... the Lord will not with draw His offer of salvation during the tribulation [Revelation 6:2]

And these will be different because they will not do as their forefathers like Solomon who was led into idolatry by women .... these will follow their Messiah and King where ever He leads them upon the earth
 
Last edited:
P

Powemm

Guest
Genesis 49:10 The scepter will not depart from Judah, nor the ruler's staff from his descendants, until the coming of the one to whom it belongs, the one whom (((all nations))) will honor.
 

Trailblazer

Senior Member
Sep 8, 2014
432
30
18
Call it what you like, but He'd be the ultimate pain in the neck for ADT to do anything about. Again, please don't try to get that flesh and blood of yours past doors, walls or your roof. Okay?
Never once have I ever made a reference to walking through walls.roofs,etc. I do appreciate your sharing of your life's experiences of things not to attempt. Not to sound prideful. Your personal attempts and expertise on the subject was really not needed or helpful. I do forgive you anyway.