No. I was just saying we don't know what last hour John was discussing. John never says "in the last hour of the Tribulation the AntiChrist will appear." It's all speculation. Regardless, let's say you are correct. I think the Man of Sin is the Beast of the Sea from Revelation 18. I believe he comes during Satan's tribulation and that he is responsible for most of the slaughtering of Christians and Jews.
You think that the Man of Sin/AntiChrist comes from within us, from the Church. Based on one verse which clearly states that AntiChrists (multiple) have come out from us. It does not say THE AntiChrist comes out from us. Please read it again. Look at the next verse. It is all plural. It is all about THEY.
They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.
Now consider this. John was in Asia Minor at the time he wrote this. Asia Minor is modern day Turkey. Turkey was the main part of the Ottoman Empire which was the 7th beast John wrote about. All 7 churches John wrote to in Rev 2-3 are in Turkey. Christianity was huge in Asia Minor at the start. Turkey was the birthplace of numerous Christian Apolstles and Saints such as Paul of Tarsus, Timothy, Nichols of Myra, and Polycarp of Smyrna, etc.
If the A/C was from one of these churches, then I think we satisfy the above without it being the Roman Catholic Church. Agreed? Nothing says the AntiChrist comes from the RCC. This is an assumption you make. If the A/C came from another church, would that satisfy you?
None of the other descriptions match the RCC. They all match ISLAM and Saudi Arabia perfectly. And the A/C coming from Turkey also matches.
You think that the Man of Sin/AntiChrist comes from within us, from the Church. Based on one verse which clearly states that AntiChrists (multiple) have come out from us. It does not say THE AntiChrist comes out from us. Please read it again. Look at the next verse. It is all plural. It is all about THEY.
They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.
Now consider this. John was in Asia Minor at the time he wrote this. Asia Minor is modern day Turkey. Turkey was the main part of the Ottoman Empire which was the 7th beast John wrote about. All 7 churches John wrote to in Rev 2-3 are in Turkey. Christianity was huge in Asia Minor at the start. Turkey was the birthplace of numerous Christian Apolstles and Saints such as Paul of Tarsus, Timothy, Nichols of Myra, and Polycarp of Smyrna, etc.
If the A/C was from one of these churches, then I think we satisfy the above without it being the Roman Catholic Church. Agreed? Nothing says the AntiChrist comes from the RCC. This is an assumption you make. If the A/C came from another church, would that satisfy you?
None of the other descriptions match the RCC. They all match ISLAM and Saudi Arabia perfectly. And the A/C coming from Turkey also matches.
they went out from us.
mean they come out from us. Us mean christian. If John say us, as a apostle John is consider us as christian not a race or resident.
Jew is the same race with John, but if they are not christian, they are outsider.
Seem to me you believe is:
When John said they are from us mean they are from Turkey.
I can't find other verse that said that Antichrist is from Turkey.
I believe since apostle John era, there is Antichrist in most of church every where, not only Turkey.
And if the there is Antichrist in Turkey 2000 years ago, do you believe the last Antichrist will be from Turkey?
The characteristic of Antichrist is that He will be worship by all nation as God and will be reign from the temple in Jerusalem.
I don't see any Muslim will pretend to be God, but Pope is. He represent Jesus on earth.
He want Jerusalem so badly.
I type Vatican want Jerusalem and found more than million article
About 1,410,000 results (0.63 seconds)
[h=2]Search Results[/h]
- [h=3]The Vatican and Jerusalem[/h]www.redmoonrising.com/chamish/vaticanagenda.htm
How Does The Vatican View The Legitimacy of Israel's Claims To Jerusalem? By Joel Bainerman ... of Jerusalem". It is something else, which the Vatican wants.
- [h=3]Expose: The Vatican Wants to Lay its Hands on Jerusalem[/h]www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/150757
Arutz Sheva
Dec 15, 2011 - The Vatican is now reiterating demands for control of religious sites inJerusalem. Jordan's occupation 1948-1967 didn't bother them.
- [h=3]Why Does the Vatican Want a Palestinian State ...[/h]https://www.thetrumpet.com/.../why-does-the-vati...The Philadelphia Trumpet
In his sermon on Christmas Day, the current Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Fouad Twal, reiterated Catholic support for Palestinian statehood. “We want a just and ...
- [h=3]U.S. plan gives Jerusalem holy sites to Vatican[/h]www.wnd.com/.../u-s-plan-gives-jerusalem-holy-sites-to-...
WorldNetDaily
Dec 15, 2013 - U.S. plan gives Jerusalem holy sites to Vatican .... most people do not realize the Vatican has wanted to control Jerusalem for a very long time?