Who was Jesus Praying to in the Bible?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
Agreed. . .and Scripture does not say "God is sovereign,"
nor does it say the nature of sonship to God is "relationship,"
but it reveals it nonetheless.

That there is no specific statement, "There is one being that consists of three persons,"
does not preclude the NT revelation of three divine persons in one divine being.


First of all, it is not the argument of man. It is NT revelation.

You agree that Jesus and the Father are both God, so the nature of the Holy Spirit is all there is to consider.

That issue is settled by Paul when he states "Jesus is the Spirit."
Jesus is God, and so the Holy Spirit is God.

Jesus is a person, and so the Holy Spirit is a person--he, him, his,
with personal functions: speaking (Ac 8:29), deciding (Ac 15:28), forbidding (Ac 16:7), testifying (Ac 5:32), sending out missionaries (Ac 13:14), interceding (Ro 8:26-27).

Scripture reveals three divine persons and one God.
It does not come from the mind of man.

The finite mind cannot understand nor explain it.
But that doesn't alter the revelation.

Perhaps you would like to give the Biblical meaning of "The Lord is the Spirit" in 2Co 3:17, 18,
remaining true to the words and the context.
well if the Lord is the Spirit....it is evident they are one and the same....hence the reason when the apostles gave salutation it was always from God the Father and his Son Jesus Christ/our Lord Jesus Christ.... they understood the Lord is that Spirit...but there is not that knowledge in everyone....One God one Lord....
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Agreed. . .and Scripture does not say "God is sovereign,"
nor does it say the nature of sonship to God is "relationship,"
but it reveals it nonetheless.

That there is no specific statement, "There is one being that consists of three persons,"
does not preclude the NT revelation of three divine persons in one divine being.



First of all, it is not the argument of man. It is NT revelation.

You agree that Jesus and the Father are both God, so the nature of the Holy Spirit is all there is to consider.

That issue is settled by Paul when he states "Jesus is the Spirit."
Jesus is God, and so the Holy Spirit is God.


Jesus is a person, and so the Holy Spirit is a person--he, him, his,
with personal functions: speaking (Ac 8:29), deciding (Ac 15:28), forbidding (Ac 16:7), testifying (Ac 5:32), sending out missionaries (Ac 13:14), interceding (Ro 8:26-27).


Scripture reveals three divine persons and one God.
It does not come from the mind of man.

The finite mind cannot understand nor explain it.
But that doesn't alter the revelation.

Perhaps you would like to give the Biblical meaning of "The Lord is the Spirit" in 2Co 3:17, 18,
remaining true to the words and the context.
well if the Lord is the Spirit....it is evident they are one and the same....hence the reason when the apostles gave salutation it was always from God the Father and his Son Jesus Christ/
our Lord Jesus Christ.... they understood the Lord is that Spirit...but
there is not that knowledge in everyone....One God one Lord....
I'm not sure what you mean by NT revelation (2Co 3:17, 18) not being "knowledge in everyone."

Is it not the knowledge of, or at least the knowledge to be received and believed by, those who believe the NT?
 

ForthAngel

Senior Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,171
91
48
The finite mind cannot understand nor explain it.
But that doesn't alter the revelation.
I think we can understand it if we take John 1 at it's literal words.

John 1
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life, and the life was the light of men. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
Compare this with Genesis:

Genesis 1
1 In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.

3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.
I think John 1 is to be taken literally as God's own spoken Word made flesh. Maybe this is what the trinity doctrine tries to convey, but it just comes off as something completely different to me. I think this is a better explanation. And we can compare these with this:

Colossians 1
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. 16 For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him. 17 And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent. 19 For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, 20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross.
Literally God's word put in a flesh body. If we could imagine forming a body for our own words, it would still be us, but fully it's own body at the same time, but it could only speak what we commanded it to speak because the words would still be coming from our mind and it would literally be our own words in a body. We could even call this body our child and it make perfect sense. In that case, we could consider this passage:

John 12
44 And Jesus cried out and said, “Whoever believes in me, believes not in me but in him who sent me. 45 And whoever sees me sees him who sent me. 46 I have come into the world as light, so that whoever believes in me may not remain in darkness. 47 If anyone hears my words and does not keep them, I do not judge him; for I did not come to judge the world but to save the world. 48 The one who rejects me and does not receive my words has a judge; the word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day. 49 For I have not spoken on my own authority, but the Father who sent me has himself given me a commandment—what to say and what to speak. 50 And I know that his commandment is eternal life. What I say, therefore, I say as the Father has told me.
Separate "things" (persons if you prefer), but the same God. This makes way more sense to me though than saying three persons and one God because that comes off as polytheism to me and fails to really explain the concept. This also clears up two things for me:

Matthew 24:36
36 “But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only.
and:

John 14
28 You heard me say to you, ‘I am going away, and I will come to you.’ If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I. 29 And now I have told you before it takes place, so that when it does take place you may believe. 30 I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is coming. He has no claim on me, 31 but I do as the Father has commanded me, so that the world may know that I love the Father. Rise, let us go from here.
It explains to me why Jesus wouldn't know the day or the hour but can still be fully God at the same time and why he claims the Father is greater than he and still claim to be God. I just think this is a more comprehensible explanation than the general statement of "3 persons, one God" and I don't think this explanation undermines that truth in any way.
 
W

weakness

Guest
I get what you're saying here, guys, (I do) but the problem still remains...

If Jesus is God, why is he talking to God? If Jesus is God, why does he say "your will not mine" to an apparently higher entity whose will is individual from His own?

The God Jesus is talking to in this verse clearly has a separate viewpoint on things from himself. How is this possible if they are both the same person?[/QUOTE.....I remember when Jesus was asking the Father something I think when Lazarus was raised from the dead, Then also Jesus says " I know you always hear me Father but for Their sake (those present) I speak this out loud to you, or something like that. A lot of what Jesus did was for our sake or the people around him at the time. His purpose was to be an example to us. Some one said in this thread "be found in the form of God ,thought it not robbery to be equal with god, But took upon him the form of a servant.I think Father God is a servant, and by Jesus taking this form still remained equal with The Father. But I also think Jesus could have failed, else why does it say he was tempted like us , if there was no thing able to tempt him or if he was not able to sin there would be no temptation. This is still a mystery to me and in some ways is not the most important thing.We know we have life by God Spirit within, and that because we have been reconciled to the Father ,we have been given the ministry of reconciliation. He that wineth souls is wise. Amen.... Also regarding ...Romeo and Juliet... I think ,at least to me God shews things that he doesn't want me to talk about, or things between God and me, or Rev. 2:17 god give the over comers a white stone with our name that nobody but ourselves know,or the seven thunders in Rev. God tells John not to write the down. Even Danial is told concerning his prophesy "it is for the time of the end and the understanding was not given. But to act as a child and say you have some Great knowledge and taunt people an are prideful and braggart in your speech. This hardly declares God nature or likeness.Reflecting on the so called truth from God revealed this to could be said Hardly.
 
Jun 30, 2011
2,521
35
0
who is Jesus praying to, the father - hello, the Father in Isaiah prophetically promises to uphold Jesus by His right hand - remember Jesus was also man, so the dependence on the Father, empowered by the Holy Spirit - the life that we should all be living, is how He did it

Good question to ask oneness Pentecostals or Unitarians as well
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
I think we can understand it if we take John 1 at it's literal words.

John 1
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life, and the life was the light of men. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
. . .I think John 1 is to be taken literally as God's own spoken Word made flesh.
Yes, and keeping in mind that the Word is God (Jn 1:1).

And then to continue with Jn 1:13:

"The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us.
We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,
who came from the Father, full of grace and truth."

Christ Jesus is that Word who is God made flesh (Jn 1:1).

Maybe this is what the trinity doctrine tries to convey, but it
just comes off as something completely different to me. I think this is a better explanation.
Well, let's go back to the beginning of the original creation in Ge 1:1,
as Jn went back to the beginning of the new creation (2Co 5:17) in Jn 1:1:

"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty,
darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the
Spirit (breath) of God was hovering over the waters.
And God said. . ."
(Ge 1:1-3)

Not only was God's word at work in creation,
God's breath (
ruach--air, wind, breath of God--Job 4:9; 2Sa 22:16; Job 4:9, 16:30)
was also at work in creation.


We find
God's Spirit and God's breath paralleled in creation (Ps 33:6);
God's breath as the Spirit in a man (Job 32:8, 33:4, 34:14-15);
God's Spirit as a wind (Jn 3:7-8).

Both God's word and God's breath are active in creation.
And in the NT we learn that God's word and God's breath are persons.

So we can see how they are one, as our thoughts (expressed in words) and our breath are ourselves,
but at the same time they are separate from ourselves.

I find this the most Biblical way to think of the Trinity,
in light of God's word and God's breath at work in the original creation of Ge,
and now at work in the new creation (2Co 5:17) of the NT.
 

ForthAngel

Senior Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,171
91
48
Yes, and keeping in mind that the Word is God (Jn 1:1).

And then to continue with Jn 1:13:

"The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us.
We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,
who came from the Father, full of grace and truth."

Christ Jesus is that Word who is God made flesh (Jn 1:1).


Well, let's go back to the beginning of the original creation in Ge 1:1,
as Jn went back to the beginning of the new creation (2Co 5:17) in Jn 1:1:

"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty,
darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the
Spirit (breath) of God was hovering over the waters.
And God said. . ."
(Ge 1:1-3)

Not only was God's word at work in creation,
God's breath (
ruach--air, wind, breath of God--Job 4:9; 2Sa 22:16; Job 4:9, 16:30)
was also at work in creation.


We find
God's Spirit and God's breath paralleled in creation (Ps 33:6);
God's breath as the Spirit in a man (Job 32:8, 33:4, 34:14-15);
God's Spirit as a wind (Jn 3:7-8).

Both God's word and God's breath are active in creation.
And in the NT we learn that God's word and God's breath are persons.

So we can see how they are one, as our thoughts (expressed in words) and our breath are ourselves,
but at the same time they are separate from ourselves.

I find this the most Biblical way to think of the Trinity,
in light of God's word and God's breath at work in the original creation of Ge,
and now at work in the new creation (2Co 5:17) of the NT.
Thanks for the explanation and I completely agree with this. It's just how some explain the trinity that causes confusion and I think there is a clearer way of defining it an this is perfect :)
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Yes, and keeping in mind that the Word is God (Jn 1:1).

And then to continue with Jn 1:13:

"The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us.
We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,
who came from the Father, full of grace and truth."

Christ Jesus is that Word who is God made flesh (Jn 1:1).


Well, let's go back to the beginning of the original creation in Ge 1:1,
as Jn went back to the beginning of the new creation (2Co 5:17) in Jn 1:1:

"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty,
darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the
Spirit (breath) of God was hovering over the waters.
And God said. . ."
(Ge 1:1-3)

Not only was God's word at work in creation,
God's breath (
ruach--air, wind, breath of God--Job 4:9; 2Sa 22:16; Job 4:9, 16:30)
was also at work in creation.


We find
God's Spirit and God's breath paralleled in creation (Ps 33:6);
God's breath as the Spirit in a man (Job 32:8, 33:4, 34:14-15);
God's Spirit as a wind (Jn 3:7-8).

Both God's word and God's breath are active in creation.
And in the NT we learn that God's word and God's breath are persons.

So we can see how they are one, as our thoughts (expressed in words) and our breath are ourselves,
but at the same time they are separate from ourselves.


I find this the most Biblical way to think of the Trinity,
in light of God's word and God's breath at work in the original creation of Ge,
and now at work in the new creation (2Co 5:17) of the NT
.
Thanks for the explanation and I completely agree with this. It's just how some explain the trinity that causes confusion and I think there is a clearer way of defining it an this is perfect :)
There is also this:

So we can see how they are one, as our thoughts (expressed in words) and our breath are ourselves,
that come forth out of ourselves,
as God's word (the Son) and God's breath (Holy Spirit) come forth out of God
(Jn 8:42, 15:26),
but at the same time they are separate from ourselves.
 
Last edited:

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,979
4,602
113
Where is the Holy Spirits throne in the future?

Why not address him in any openning n.t. letters?,

God the father , also our savior, but not third person

Isaiah 43:10-11 (HCSB)
[SUP]10 [/SUP]“You are My witnesses”— ⌊this is⌋ the LORD’s declaration— “and My servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe Meand understand that I am He. No god was formed before Me, and there will be none after Me.
[SUP]11 [/SUP]I, I am Yahweh, and there is no other Savior but Me.

Luke 2:10-11 (NASB)
[SUP]10 [/SUP]But the angel said to them, "Do not be afraid; for behold, I bring you good news of great joy which will be for all the people;
[SUP]11 [/SUP]for today in the city of David there has been born for you a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.


CHRIST THEN is part of GOD,
and the ONLY reason that I say part of GOD, is that I am counting only SPIRIT WHO is within the physical human body of Jesus Christ. When I consider that the SPIRIT in CHRIST is the OMNIPRESENT GOD of the Universe and Heaven, THEN I have to admit that when I do not stop at the skin of Jesus, then HE CERTAINLY IS THE TOTALITY OF GOD. REMEMBER, there are NOT three SPIRITS that make up GOD, but rather ONE SPIRIT Who has a THREE-FOLD NATURE.


Therefore, there would ONLY BE ONE THRONE FOR GOD, and NOT all of HIM could sit on it, as HE IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE OMNIPRESENT.

As for your other false accusation, it would help if you actually read the GOSPELS before you made the Accusation:

John 14:15-17 (KJV)
[SUP]15 [/SUP] If ye love me, keep my commandments.
[SUP]16 [/SUP] And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
[SUP]17 [/SUP] Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.

John 14:26 (YLT)
[SUP]26 [/SUP] and the Comforter, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and remind you of all things that I said to you.
John 15:26 (KJV)
[SUP]26 [/SUP] But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:

John 16:7-10 (KJV)
[SUP]7 [/SUP] Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.[SUP]8 [/SUP] And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
[SUP]9 [/SUP] Of sin, because they believe not on me;
[SUP]10 [/SUP] Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more;

The reason you do find all the events and saying of Jesus Christ in any one GOSPEL, is they WERE NOT TRYING TO TELL THE WHOLE STORY.


John 21:25 (KJV)
[SUP]25 [/SUP] And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.


Instead all four of them were only trying to tell the events that validated a different ASPECT or FACET of WHO JESUS WAS and IS.

Those four ASPECTS or FACETS are THE KING, THE SERVANT, THE MAN, and HE IS GOD.

The Four Aspects Of Jesus





MATTHEW
primarily focused on the events that validated that JESUS was the rightful heir to the Throne of David, and therefore IS the reigning KING OF ISRAEL.

Mark
primarily focused on the events that validated that JESUS came as a Servant to become the ultimate Sacrificial Lamb.

LUKE
primarily focused on the events that validated that JESUS really was human.

JOHN
primarily focused on the events that validated that JESUS really was GOD in the Flesh.


EVEN WHEN YOU READ ALL FOUR GOSPELS, you do not have the WHOLE STORY ABOUT JESUS, only the Highlights. So you can forget about using missing stories, events, and sayings as proof of anything, including contradictions, because they NEVER intended to tell the whole story in the first place.


 
I

IloveGodforever2015

Guest
Yes I honestly love God
 
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
Thank you Butch5!

This is the real information I wanted to hear. The real thing that was confusing me was the logical fallacy you mentioned. I guess that where all my confusion is coming from is that all these people keep telling me that God "split himself" in order to come to earth as Jesus and "gave up his Godhead" but that he is God. I wish people would stop changing things around. So basically, the Trinity is Three persons consisting of the same form of creature which, by definition, is God?
Yes, In 325 AD. the churches came together to address some teaching from a man named Arias who was teaching that Jesus was created. There was big dispute that lead to the Church addressing the nature of Christ. They determined that He is God in the sense that He is of the same essence that the Father is. Like the example that a human give birth to a human. When a man and a woman have a child, the child get traits from both and their ancestors. However, when the Son was born there was only the Father, there was no one else. So, the Son would have the traits of the Father alone, no mother or ancestors. Whatever God is He begets the same thing with out change. However, that Son is a different entity from the Father, they are two persons.

Right from the beginning we see, Paul says,

KJV 1 Corinthians 8:6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him (1Co 8:6 KJV)

4 There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling;
5 One Lord, one faith, one baptism,
6 One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. (Eph 4:4-6 KJV)

Jesus said in His prayer to the Father,

3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. (Joh 17:3 KJV)

The Apostles Creed begins,

1. I believe in God the Father, Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth:
2. And in Jesus Christ, his only begotten Son, our Lord:

The Nicene Creed of 325 begins,


I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.

The Revision of the Nicene Creed, Council of Constantinople 381.

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds (æons), Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father;

Notice that from the very beginning all the way up to 381 we have one God the Father. It wasn't until around hte mid 400's that this idea of three coequal co-eternal beings come into the picture with the Anthanasian Creed.

4. Neither confounding the persons nor dividing the substance.
5. For there is one person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Spirit.
6. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is all one, the glory equal, the majesty coeternal.
7. Such as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Spirit.
8. The Father uncreated, the Son uncreated, and the Holy Spirit uncreated.
9. The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, and the Holy Spirit incomprehensible.
10. The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Spirit eternal.
11. And yet they are not three eternals but one eternal.
12. As also there are not three uncreated nor three incomprehensible, but one uncreated and one incomprehensible.
13. So likewise the Father is almighty, the Son almighty, and the Holy Spirit almighty.
14. And yet they are not three almighties, but one almighty.

15. So the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God;
16. And yet they are not three Gods, but one God.
17. So likewise the Father is Lord, the Son Lord, and the Holy Spirit Lord;
18. And yet they are not three Lords but one Lord.
19. For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity to acknowledge every Person by himself to be God and Lord;


24. So there is one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three Sons; one Holy Spirit, not three Holy Spirits.
25. And in this Trinity none is afore or after another; none is greater or less than another.
26. But the whole three persons are coeternal, and coequal.


33. Equal to the Father as touching His Godhead, and inferior to the Father as touching His manhood.

It was during this time that this error entered into the faith. As you can see for the first roughly 400 years Christians believed in 'One God, the Father' and 'One Lord Jesus Christ'. I believe Augustine was one of those who pushed this three coequal co-eternal beings idea among others. However, Augustine was very influential in the Church and this likely why this teaching was adopted. Whatever the reason, the fact is that this is error and is still a major source of confusion today. If you Google the Anthansian Creed and read the entire thing you'll find that they also claimed that Christians must believe this in order to be saved. I find this statement interesting though.

1. Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith;
2. Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.
3. And the catholic faith is this: That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity;

44. This is the catholic faith, which except a man believe faithfully he cannot be saved.

Originally, the word catholic meant universal. However, it came to be what the Church was called, the catholic church became the Roman Catholic Church. I'm not certain at what time this change actually took place but, Augustine is claimed by the Catholic Church as one of their church fathers. As much a Protestants hate to admit it, their movement did come out of the Catholic Church and Catholicism. The Reformers did get rid of some of the Erroneous beliefs of the Catholic church, but, they didn't get rid of them all, and this is one they kept.

If you are interested I can give you some links to some very good teaching on the Trinity. Just let me know.
 
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
Do YOU?

Acts 5:3-4 (HCSB)
[SUP]3 [/SUP] Then Peter said, “Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the proceeds from the field?
[SUP]4 [/SUP] Wasn’t it yours while you possessed it? And after it was sold, wasn’t it at your disposal? Why is it that you planned this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God!”
Yes, I do. What do these passages have to do with the Trintiy?
 
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
Agreed. . .and Scripture does not say "God is sovereign,"
nor does it say the nature of sonship to God is "relationship,"
but it reveals it nonetheless.

That there is no specific statement, "There is one being that consists of three persons,"
does not preclude the NT revelation of three divine persons in one divine being.
Logic does. The idea you are present is confusion, yet God is not a God of confusion. Look, the Scriptures don't speak out and say, I mean this, or, no, you're understanding that incorrectly. Every person who reads the Scriptures must interpret the Scriptures. Everyone who interprets the Scriptures comes to the Scriptures presuppositions. They already have certain beliefs before they ever approach the Scriptures. Those beliefs influence the way they understand the Scriptures. So, one comes to the Scriptures already believing that there is one being that consists of three beings, they impose that on the text.

The reason I keep asking you for Scripture that shows one being consists of three persons is that I hole you'll realize that Scripture doesn't say that and that it's a presupposition. Once we realize our presuppositions we're in a better position examine them.

So, I've asked for Scripture showing that there is one being that consists of three persons and there is none. On the other hand I've presented Scripture that needs no interpretation, it is a plain statement. Paul said, 'to us there is one God, the Father.' Jesus said when praying to the Father, ;that they may know you, the only true God.' Again, a plain statement.

You said,
"Agreed. . .and Scripture does not say "God is sovereign,"
nor does it say the nature of sonship to God is "relationship,"
but it reveals it nonetheless.
But it doesn't. You may believe it does because of the way you are interpreting certain passages of Scripture. Your statement, "it reveals it" is based on the assumption that your understanding of those passages is correct. Yet, your understanding of those passages brings you to a conclusion that is illogical. God created all things and logic is one of those things. He gave man a mind to reason with so that man could communicate with Him. He tells the Israelites,

16 Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil;
17 Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow. {relieve: or, righten}
18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. (Isa 1:16-18 KJV)

Learning and reasoning require logic. God wanted the Israelites to reason with Him. Accepting logical contradictions is not proper logic and reasoning. If I told you that I consisted of three persons you'd probably argue that I wasn't that it is impossible, why? Because you know that a person cannot be three different People, it's a contradiction.



First of all, it is not the argument of man. It is NT revelation.

You agree that Jesus and the Father are both God, so the nature of the Holy Spirit is all there is to consider.

That issue is settled by Paul when he states "Jesus is the Spirit."
Jesus is God, and so the Holy Spirit is God.

Jesus is a person, and so the Holy Spirit is a person--he, him, his,
with personal functions: speaking (Ac 8:29), deciding (Ac 15:28), forbidding (Ac 16:7), testifying (Ac 5:32), sending out missionaries (Ac 13:14), interceding (Ro 8:26-27).

Scripture reveals three divine persons and one God.
It does not come from the mind of man.

The finite mind cannot understand nor explain it.
But that doesn't alter the revelation.

Perhaps you would like to give the Biblical meaning of "The Lord is the Spirit" in 2Co 3:17, 18,
remaining true to the words and the context.
It is from the mind of man. It doesn't appear in Christianity until around 450 BC. long after Jesus and the Apostles established the faith. If you read post 151 I explained when this idea entered into the Christian faith.

Again, it goes back to how one interprets that Scriptures and what presuppositions they bring to the text.
 
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
For those who hold to "one being consisting of three persons," I'd like to present a major problem that this idea presents, actually, it's two fold. One is that I diminishes the glory of the Father. Jesus said that the Father was the only true God and He gave all honor and glory to the Father. However, this idea is not actually a trinity since it consists of 4 beings. It consists of the Father, Son, Holy Spirit and the being made of the three called God. Not only that but, if the Father is a part of this being then it means the being is greater than the Father (that's a scary doctrine). So, not only is it not a trinity it puts someone in a position above the Father, a concept that is found "NOWHERE" in Scripture.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,378
6,638
113
FYI.................only.............

1st Thessalonians 5:23 .) And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.


Paul reveals the triune nature of man in Scripture................and this does not lessen that we are a man.........who, BTW was created in the Image of God...........

The Holy Trinity in no way lessens God's Glory, if anything, it magnifies it beyond the understanding of man.......

:)

God bless
 
E

Elijah19

Guest
Could it be then, p_rehbein, that we being created in the image of God are just small reflections of the Trinity, possessing spirit soul and body?

Interesting idea. I hadn't considered this... Would this imply that we are (no blasphemy indicated) little mini-models of Trinity?
 
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
Could it be then, p_rehbein, that we being created in the image of God are just small reflections of the Trinity, possessing spirit soul and body?

Interesting idea. I hadn't considered this... Would this imply that we are (no blasphemy indicated) little mini-models of Trinity?
We have to be careful though. That passage doesn't tell us what it means to be made in the image of God. That statement is used both ways. I've seen some use it to argue that man is body, soul, and spirit, and I've people are that the passage is proof that the God is a Trinity.

The passage in Gen 1 doesn't prove that God is a Trinity. God says let us make man in ""our" image. It's then assumed that God is, Fahter, Son, and Holy Spirit, therefore man must be triune. There are two issues here, one is that the passage doesn't tel us what being made in God's image means. Two, there is in the Hebrew language what is know as the "majestic Plural". The Majestic Plural is the use of a Plural pronoun for a single person. This is done to emphasize the majesty of the one to whom it is applied. If you Google "Majestic Plural" you can see what I mean. That this is a Majestic Plural in Gen 1 can be seen in the following.

26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. (Gen 1:1 KJV)

In verse 27 we see Moses used the singular personal pronouns, His and He.
 
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
FYI.................only.............

1st Thessalonians 5:23 .) And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.



Paul reveals the triune nature of man in Scripture................and this does not lessen that we are a man.........who, BTW was created in the Image of God...........

The Holy Trinity in no way lessens God's Glory, if anything, it magnifies it beyond the understanding of man.......

:)

God bless
I would submit that Paul isn't revealing a triune nature. In Gen 2:7 we are told of the creation of man. In that passage we find God using to things to create a third.

7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. (Gen 2:7 KJV)

I submit that a body from the ground and the breath/spirit of Life together form a living soul.