Do people actually speak in Tongues (for real) anymore?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 10, 2015
1,174
18
0
Prophesy to us all here. Prove your idle chatter. You want to tell us you are a prophet that prophesies? Elijah answered the challenge because he was a man of God. You a man of God? God stands with His. Prophesy and let us see the edification.
I hit you with the sword of the spirit and you dumped in your diapers. A true man of God knows the power of the sword, you cannot even unfold a pocket knife without help.

Then the obvious challenge. Phil, you got busted and caught man up or be gone.
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
Tell you about an event I witnessed. The preacher where I got saved came to visit another church I attended one sunday evening.
There were no foreigners, no folks that couldn't speak english, just a bunch of ole dumb Americans. And this preacher proceeded to stand up and babble nonsense to the congregation. And then he "interpreted" what he said.
Friend, do you really think that if God has a message for you He delivers it in such a convoluted manner? Ridiculous. I didn't get saved in that preachers church because he saved me, I got saved because God had burdened me and I just so happened to be in that place when I repented. I would have been saved, under the same circumstances, in a bar.

I have seen this time and time again and it serves NO purpose.
"Let all things be done to edifying"....."tongues" or babbling, edifies no one. It is not of God as it is practiced today.
It doesn't matter if there are foreigners in the congregation - speaking in tongues with interpretation comes from God and is for the edification of the church. I believe that God can choose to give a message to a group of believers gathered together to worship him in any manner that He wants to. I do believe in tongues with interpretation in a church gathering and it is for edification of the church. Or else this is a lie: "I would that you all spake with tongues, but rather that you prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaks with tongues unless he interpret that the church may receive edifying." [1 Cor. 14:5] And this is a lie: "But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal." [1 Cor. 12:7]

We know that this part isn't a lie because this is what has turned most away from the manifestation of tongues:
If therefore the whole church be come together into one place, and all speak with tongues, and there come in those that are unlearned, or unbelievers, will they not say that you are mad (babbling)? [1 Cor. 14:23] or this:
How is it then, brethren? when you come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done decently and in order. [1 Cor.14:26] Then the description of how it is to be done follows.

The above is what MOST people see and come to understand when anyone talks about this subject. So since some misuse the manifestation then let's just forget about it and have no part of it . . . just forget that when you speak in tongues you edify yourself spiritually. He that speaks in an tongue edifieth himself: [1 Co. 14:4a] But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the holy spirit. [Jude 20]

<sigh> I am sorry that you believe it serves no purpose.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,401
113
Stop trying to earn another green hash mark bro. We disagree that the perfect in 1 Cor 13 is the Bible, I believe the perfect in 1 Cor 13 is Jesus Christ. That said, I do believe the Bible is my complete=perfect authority in all matters pertaining to life and godliness.
This view contradicts a few things like....Jesus had already came, fulfilled the will of the Father, died, resurrected, is in heaven and on his throne and PERFECT when Paul writes his Corinthian letters.....Jesus did nit need to be COMPLETED as HE WAS ALREADY COMPLETE...come on...use some common sense...your view and applying it to Christ does not jive!
 
P

phil112

Guest
I hit you with the sword of the spirit and you dumped in your diapers. A true man of God knows the power of the sword, you cannot even unfold a pocket knife without help.

Then the obvious challenge. Phil, you got busted and caught man up or be gone.
You are so proud of speaking in "tongues", so you will surely be just as ready to tell us how many people you have healed and how many poisonous snakes you have handled. Paul shook one off into the fire. C'mon, share with us, "brother"....let us here some testimony from all these people you have saved, from all these people you have healed, from all these people that watched you handling snakes.

You should have listened to this old maxim first, but it's too late for you now.
Better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt
 
Sep 6, 2014
7,034
5,435
113
I hit you with the sword of the spirit and you dumped in your diapers. A true man of God knows the power of the sword, you cannot even unfold a pocket knife without help.

Then the obvious challenge. Phil, you got busted and caught man up or be gone.
Another inappropriate comment from someone who can't stand truth and resorts to bad mouthing the brethren when their babbling don't get approved or someone disagrees with them. Looks like you need a diaper change, a baba, and a knap. grow up dude!
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,060
3,399
113
I always find it interesting when a thread like this degrades to this point. Invariably the persons reporting posts as being abusive are just as guilty as the person they are reporting.

That being said, I understand that threads dealing with Continuationism vs Cessationism are bound to get heated because persons on both sides tend to be absolutely convinced of the voracity of their arguments, however when a thread begins to degrade to insults and sarcasm it's time for us to step in.

It is entirely possible to debate a topic (regardless of how divisive the topic) without being insulting, sarcastic, or derogatory towards other members

If this thread continues as it has in recent posts infraction points will be issued to all offenders from this point forward.
 
M

MaggieMye

Guest
[h=2]Re: Do people actually speak in Tongues (for real) anymore?[/h] YES. I do.
Maggie
 
Feb 5, 2015
1,852
13
0
Y'know, Dcon, we're so close on so many things. You have a lot going on my friend. :)

To expound on your post........ "But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away"....who here will deny that the written word of God is perfect? Who here can deny that the written word of God transcends the need for tongues?
As knowledge is written alongside tongues in those verses, do you believe knowledge has also been done away with?
 
Sep 6, 2014
7,034
5,435
113
i totally agree brother Phil.......wonder if those who support babbling as such have ever come to learn that Mark 16 ended at verse 8 and later some translators added verses 9-20.......

"Although the vast majority of later Greek manuscripts contain Mark 16:9-20, the Gospel of Mark ends at verse 8 in two of the oldest and most respected manuscripts, the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus. As the oldest manuscripts are known to be the most accurate because there were fewer generations of copies from the original autographs (i.e., they are much closer in time to the originals), and the oldest manuscripts do not contain vv. 9-20, we can conclude that these verses were added later by scribes. The King James Version of the Bible, as well as the New King James, contains vv. 9-20 because the King James used medieval manuscripts as the basis of its translation. Since 1611, however, older and more accurate manuscripts have been discovered and they affirm that vv. 9-20 were not in the original Gospel of Mark."Should Mark 16:9-20 be in the Bible?
your response when you decided to strike with your 2 fangs and big mouth wide open.......slithering through the clovers.......

Complete and utter rubbish, I recommend you go and do a bit of research on the matter and speak as one who is "informed" and not one who speaks out of "ignorance"!
my response......

Sometimes the truth hurts huh? especially when you realize you have been deceived by men into babbling cause you like lies and hate truth? .......please:rolleyes:
your response.....
Climb down from your high horse sir, before someone throws you off it onto your backside!

You're saved barely 9 years and ofcourse you know it ALL! LOL :p
my response.......
Nice try baiting me there.......LOL

btw i'm reporting this post of yours here ;)
btw i have been "saved" since i read the bible almost 23 years ago dude, the Holy Spirit dawned almost 9 years ago do try and get your story straight! (i don't know it all either but learn everyday....... ask somebody.......sigh.......

your response.......

Wasn't a bait, just a reply to your rather arrogant reply to my post (Post #80 for info off the Admin)!
LOL .......this is how you responded to the above comments i made earlier and you call my post arrogant?
if you are offended by the truth maybe you got a whole different kind of spirit in you and if your gonna act like a little baby you should not jump into debate if you can't do so without getting offended.......
 
Sep 6, 2014
7,034
5,435
113
I always find it interesting when a thread like this degrades to this point. Invariably the persons reporting posts as being abusive are just as guilty as the person they are reporting.

That being said, I understand that threads dealing with Continuationism vs Cessationism are bound to get heated because persons on both sides tend to be absolutely convinced of the voracity of their arguments, however when a thread begins to degrade to insults and sarcasm it's time for us to step in.

It is entirely possible to debate a topic (regardless of how divisive the topic) without being insulting, sarcastic, or derogatory towards other members

If this thread continues as it has in recent posts infraction points will be issued to all offenders from this point forward.
Just seen your post,
i'm going to disengage from this unfruitful conversation.......thanks
 
K

Kaycie

Guest
No. Where there were prophesies they will cease, where there were tongues they will be stilled. For when completion (of the bible) comes, what was only in part will disappear.
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
No. Where there were prophesies they will cease, where there were tongues they will be stilled. For when completion (of the bible) comes, what was only in part will disappear.
8) Charity never fails: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away . . . 10) But when that which is perfect [complete, mature] is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. . . . 12) For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

I still need a word of knowledge at times and in circumstances so I hope God still talks to me and gives me instruction.
Even with scripture, I, by no means know everything but only know in part . . . and I have yet to see scripture "face to face". . . . .
 
K

kgraj

Guest
He need not cheat others.
 
K

kgraj

Guest
Holy Spirit Gifts are available even to day.Some people become a movie actress.They only act they don't feel.
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
Excellent point.....and the answer is...no where did it say that Jesus spoke in tongues.....!
That's true . . . he didn't. The gift of holy spirit came on the day of Pentecost when the apostles were instructed to wait for the promise of the Father and they would be baptized with holy Spirit. Then on the day of Pentecost they were all filled and began to speak with other tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance. First occurrence of speaking in tongues.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
No. Where there were prophesies they will cease, where there were tongues they will be stilled. For when completion (of the bible) comes, what was only in part will disappear.
We really do need to be careful adding our opinions like this. I guess it's OK if WE get to thinking the Bible really said that... but we may have to answer for anyone we misled by doing this.

Ya see, when we do this, we are no better than some of the TV preachers we put down for THEIR claims because of words THEY added.

Better to simply say, "THIS is what I understand that to mean."
 
P

phil112

Guest
One last tidbit to ponder. Tongues was a gift before the new testament was written. If tongues is so important, don't you wonder why not one single sentence made it into scripture?