(1) I think you will find, if yahweh permits, that the carnal nature is not changed by the law (well, maybe provoked by it!) .... no difference if the law is or is not abolished (not pertinent here).
(2) so ?
(3) this is toward clarification, if it is even possible on this forum. (might have to go to a Hebrew forum to find the Truth).
(2) so ?
(3) this is toward clarification, if it is even possible on this forum. (might have to go to a Hebrew forum to find the Truth).
A doctrine that claims that God's instructions are now abolished to any extent, and has changed the order, (from the beginning of time), of His step by step plan, is a false doctrine. If we are to focus on what has changed or what has been abolished, we should be focusing on what happed to the born-again believer, saved from death unto life. To focus on a change or abolishment of God's instructions labels a God that is reconnoitering according to the original plan from the beginning.
Granted, God has always desired to have His only begotten Son to be our High Priest, but in order for us to know all of our Savior's glory and might, we needed a physical forerunner as a parable so that we could believe He was able to fulfill that promise for the reemission of our sins and not God's supposed error of burdensome laws.
If this doctrine is purposeful, then it stands to reason why deceptive dialog demands us to believe that Jesus came to somehow change His own Father's omniscience. That is clearly taking the Lord's name in vain. (Exodus 20:7) We should be focusing on our change, not His change. That is the good news. If we focus on God changing through Christ so we can escape the punishment of sin without any accountability, that is not good news, it's actually bad news.
"Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity." Matthew 7:22-23
Granted, God has always desired to have His only begotten Son to be our High Priest, but in order for us to know all of our Savior's glory and might, we needed a physical forerunner as a parable so that we could believe He was able to fulfill that promise for the reemission of our sins and not God's supposed error of burdensome laws.
If this doctrine is purposeful, then it stands to reason why deceptive dialog demands us to believe that Jesus came to somehow change His own Father's omniscience. That is clearly taking the Lord's name in vain. (Exodus 20:7) We should be focusing on our change, not His change. That is the good news. If we focus on God changing through Christ so we can escape the punishment of sin without any accountability, that is not good news, it's actually bad news.
"Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity." Matthew 7:22-23
Last edited: