Is Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) a total joke?
- Thread starter JackH
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Ridiculous.
Carbon dating is reliable well over 10,000 years.
And you know what that means, right?
Any credible scientific source will tell you that carbon dating is reliable well over 10,000 years.
I'm talking about the kind of scientific information that is published in credible peer-reviewed scientific journals.
The only places you will find your kind of pseudoscience is YEC propaganda machines like Institute for Creation Research and Answers in Genesis.
Carbon dating is reliable well over 10,000 years.
And you know what that means, right?
Any credible scientific source will tell you that carbon dating is reliable well over 10,000 years.
I'm talking about the kind of scientific information that is published in credible peer-reviewed scientific journals.
The only places you will find your kind of pseudoscience is YEC propaganda machines like Institute for Creation Research and Answers in Genesis.
V
I notice here that you completely ignored the discrediting of your article regarding "re-aging" the Earth and moving its birthday back 60 million years based on the unreliable isotope dating method using Xenon.
Seems the only leg you can manage to keep standing on is using bad information that has been discredited time and time again, including one debunked six years ago that you hoped no one would notice. Your efforts are miserable failures, you resort to ad hominem attacks when your lack of scholarship and knowledge fails you, and even then you hope no one notices you can neither defend your position, nor evolution.
If I were you and suffered from your complete and utter lack of comprehension on the subject you nonetheless insist is the one and only explanation for our existence, I'd consider keeping my mouth shut and pretending I wasn't interested. But you're like the punch-drunk fighter, unable to stay out of the ring, insisting on getting your brains beat out by continuing in post after post after post, each of which proves you are clueless, angry, bitter, and jealous.
Why don't you just give up, sit down at the feet of Jesus, and learn of Him? Wanting Him is the the only reason I can imagine that you keep coming back for more intellectual punishment.
Seems the only leg you can manage to keep standing on is using bad information that has been discredited time and time again, including one debunked six years ago that you hoped no one would notice. Your efforts are miserable failures, you resort to ad hominem attacks when your lack of scholarship and knowledge fails you, and even then you hope no one notices you can neither defend your position, nor evolution.
If I were you and suffered from your complete and utter lack of comprehension on the subject you nonetheless insist is the one and only explanation for our existence, I'd consider keeping my mouth shut and pretending I wasn't interested. But you're like the punch-drunk fighter, unable to stay out of the ring, insisting on getting your brains beat out by continuing in post after post after post, each of which proves you are clueless, angry, bitter, and jealous.
Why don't you just give up, sit down at the feet of Jesus, and learn of Him? Wanting Him is the the only reason I can imagine that you keep coming back for more intellectual punishment.
Last edited:
I don't care if the age of the earth is changed by 60 million years. I don't care if the scientific consensus is 10 billion years or 4 billion years or 2 billion years.
But I do care when somebody says the earth is around 6,000 years old and there is absolutely no credible scientific evidence to support that claim.
Instead of going into yet another incoherent rant and rage post, how about answering a question:
Have any dinosaur fossils been discovered that can be dated at under 6,000 years old?
If you say yes, please provide a link to the scientific study that makes that claim.
But I do care when somebody says the earth is around 6,000 years old and there is absolutely no credible scientific evidence to support that claim.
Instead of going into yet another incoherent rant and rage post, how about answering a question:
Have any dinosaur fossils been discovered that can be dated at under 6,000 years old?
If you say yes, please provide a link to the scientific study that makes that claim.
Ken Ham said on his Facebook page: "Here is just one of many examples of Peter Enns rejecting the plain teaching of the Bible and undermining God's Word—he totally rejects a worldwide Flood,"
There is no scientific evidence you can find in any credible scientific source that there was a global flood 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.
Again, you YECs get your flood geology from 7th-Day Adventists and you don't even know it. Well, you didn't know it until I told you.
Ham is a tare. Go look that up in your Bible.
There is no scientific evidence you can find in any credible scientific source that there was a global flood 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.
Again, you YECs get your flood geology from 7th-Day Adventists and you don't even know it. Well, you didn't know it until I told you.
Ham is a tare. Go look that up in your Bible.
Well this right here shows it. You're willing to accept that the earth is so old when such ages break every scientific fact and even every scientific theory. It's simply impossible by its own massive weight and the sole reason it is taught is on consensus of a few pagans and atheists. They are not even credible sources for the age of the earth because they have only existed less than 300 years. Credible sources for the age of the earth is history. The Bible is history, it is not all the evidence, but it is a major piece of evidence that cannot be overlooked.
As for dating fossils to thousands of years old, yes, they can be dated that old. It can be dated with the historical record containing such creatures as living, evidence of the event which is needed to cause fossilization which is the Great Flood sent by God in the time of Noah, and the evidence of the ages after the Flood being exactly as the Bible and history says they are. Those are just a few ways, but are the hardest evidences.
Sifting through the evidence of history is a deeper matter, but it is not impossible. To examine this you can examine the historical record and how it came to be, archaeology, and the current conditions of the earth. All these and more can be used to prove history. Additionally this makes for a mountain of proof for the Bible as both part of history, but also as the all encompassing paradigm within which history itself fits into.
As for dating fossils to thousands of years old, yes, they can be dated that old. It can be dated with the historical record containing such creatures as living, evidence of the event which is needed to cause fossilization which is the Great Flood sent by God in the time of Noah, and the evidence of the ages after the Flood being exactly as the Bible and history says they are. Those are just a few ways, but are the hardest evidences.
Sifting through the evidence of history is a deeper matter, but it is not impossible. To examine this you can examine the historical record and how it came to be, archaeology, and the current conditions of the earth. All these and more can be used to prove history. Additionally this makes for a mountain of proof for the Bible as both part of history, but also as the all encompassing paradigm within which history itself fits into.
You win the award for getting the most wrong in one post.
It's difficult for me to even pick what statement of yours to start with.
So I'll just start at the beginning.
What I accept for the age of the earth is how old credible science says it is, and that is billions, not 6,000 years old.
What scientific facts and scientific theories are broken when credible scientists determines that the earth is billions of years old?
Whatever your answer is, I would like a source besides you.
Now, you say: "They are not even credible sources for the age of the earth because they have only existed less than 300 years."
What, the scientific measurement techniques?
We didn't have the science to take us to the moon 300 years ago.
We didn't have the science to make cell phones and computers 300 years ago.
That's just for starters on your post.
It's difficult for me to even pick what statement of yours to start with.
So I'll just start at the beginning.
What I accept for the age of the earth is how old credible science says it is, and that is billions, not 6,000 years old.
What scientific facts and scientific theories are broken when credible scientists determines that the earth is billions of years old?
Whatever your answer is, I would like a source besides you.
Now, you say: "They are not even credible sources for the age of the earth because they have only existed less than 300 years."
What, the scientific measurement techniques?
We didn't have the science to take us to the moon 300 years ago.
We didn't have the science to make cell phones and computers 300 years ago.
That's just for starters on your post.
yes - the massive cover up has been uncovered - Dinosaurs were uncovered buried alongside and along with modern animals, modern plants and modern birds and no one was told - see DVD and book at www.TheGrandExperiment.com /living fossils by Dr.Carl Werner - come home now - wincam
I posit to you all of history. All of history testifies against the young lies of old earth mythology.
Look into why they claim old earth mythology. It is for two predominant reasons. The first reason is radioatomic dating. This is proven to be false from dating things they know the ages of for certain and getting the vastly wrong answers. It is even proven wrong in its theory because it makes the assumption that those billions of years were uniformitarian so that nothing could interfere with the chemical make-up of any material. The uniformitarianism needed to prove radio-atomic dating ironically contradicts other old earth mythological theories (ie: the fictional asteroid hitting earth during the fictional cretaceous period.)
The second reason people believe in the old earth mythology is because they are atheists and pagans and they merely want to try to disprove the Bible, but they cannot, so they form theories that can never be proven and then they and their peers review eachother's theories and come to a consensus to present their theories as factual.
Their flawed techniques aren't even 300 years old, those are even younger. Their theory is only now drawing close to 300 years old. Too late in the game to be credible. By reason that it is self-evident that their theories contradict eachother and their methods are based on assumptions or fraud any person that simply thinks them through can realize.
As for the moon landing, funny you mention that as the moon landing is perhaps the biggest hoax of all time so far.
Look into why they claim old earth mythology. It is for two predominant reasons. The first reason is radioatomic dating. This is proven to be false from dating things they know the ages of for certain and getting the vastly wrong answers. It is even proven wrong in its theory because it makes the assumption that those billions of years were uniformitarian so that nothing could interfere with the chemical make-up of any material. The uniformitarianism needed to prove radio-atomic dating ironically contradicts other old earth mythological theories (ie: the fictional asteroid hitting earth during the fictional cretaceous period.)
The second reason people believe in the old earth mythology is because they are atheists and pagans and they merely want to try to disprove the Bible, but they cannot, so they form theories that can never be proven and then they and their peers review eachother's theories and come to a consensus to present their theories as factual.
Their flawed techniques aren't even 300 years old, those are even younger. Their theory is only now drawing close to 300 years old. Too late in the game to be credible. By reason that it is self-evident that their theories contradict eachother and their methods are based on assumptions or fraud any person that simply thinks them through can realize.
As for the moon landing, funny you mention that as the moon landing is perhaps the biggest hoax of all time so far.
