You should actually read the websites you are posting.
from the first link:
The most reliable? “Surveys conducted by professional polling organizations on a periodic basis which repeatedly ask the same question — such as, ‘Do you intend to buy a car in the next three months?’ — are fully scientific and useful,” says J. Michael Steele, Wharton professor of statistics. “Even though we really don’t know what a person means when he says ‘yes,’ we can make hay out of the fact that last year, 15% said ‘yes’ and this year only 5% said ‘yes.'” An example of a polling company that fits this profile is the Gallup organization and the Gallup Poll, considered a leading barometer of public opinion.
It also talks about how bad polls (which the homosexuality poll was not a bad poll but was scientifically strenuous) are used to influence opinion, for example saying jeb is the leading candidate influences people to choose him.
And for the second site:
the BLOGGER got all his material from here http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Congressional/California_Recall3.html
this site shows also that the more strenuous polling companies get it right.
I seriously recommend you actually read websites before you post them.
I did read it and notice how what you posted from the site, the first part is posed as a question.
It is not saying that it is accurate and goes on to say how bad they are because it is only based on public opinion, and how badly peoples opinion can be influenced one way or the other to get a falsified result.....
Who is placing who against who? All i see is you placing yourself against everybody, twisting scripture into the shape of a gun with which you can shoot little unloving bullets of disgust at them because they are worried. Why are they worried? Because we have been placed as the opposition to the ever growing walk towards immorality in this new sexual revolution.
Once again that is your opinion as I have been in plenty of threads having friendly respectful debates and talks with others.
Many of which have agreed with me and others have not, but it still stayed friendly and respectful between all of us. There has only been 3 people on here who have gotten heated with me and turned the debate into a heated name calling, belittling, and even gone as far as condemning in their responses.
I in turn just stayed respectful and kept responding to them in a loving tone even though they spewed all that hatred at me.
I am not twisting scripture my friend, that twisting is coming from those who I call out because they litterally take clear scripture and take it to say something it doesn't.
Example:
James 5:19-20
People have tried to twist this verse to say it is not referring to eternal life, however James clearly says the one who falls away from the faith their
"soul" will not be saved unless they return to the Lord. (Repentance or their sinful ways they have gone back to.)
The bible says only God can destroy/kill the soul
(Matthew 10:28) and this is done when it is cast into the lake of fire.
The word soul here in the Greek is psuche, and Strong's and Thayer's show this is how it is applied in this verse;
b. "the (human) soul in so far as it is so constituted that by the right use of the aids offered it by God it can attain its highest end and secure eternal blessedness, the soul regarded as a moral being designed for everlasting life": 3 John 1:2; ἀγρύπνειν ὑπέρ τῶν ψυχῶν, Hebrews 13:17;ἐπιθυμίαι, αἵτινες στρατεύονται κατά τῆς ψυχῆς, 1 Peter 2:11; ἐπίσκοπος τῶν ψυχῶν, 1 Peter 2:25; σῴζειν τάς ψυχάς,James 1:21; ψυχήν ἐκ θανάτου, from eternal death, James 5:20;σωτηρία ψυχῶν, 1 Peter 1:9; ἁγνίζειν τάς ψυχάς ἑαυτῶν, 1 Peter 1:22; (τάς ψυχάς πιστῷ κτίστῃ παρατίθεσθαι, 1 Peter 4:19).
LA LA LA LA
