R
Well, I would like for you to slowly re-read (and take in each word in meditation) and pray over 1 Peter 4:1, Galatians 5:24, Romans 6:14, and 2 Peter 2:1, 14 and just be honest with yourself in what they say.
In Romans chapter 7, Paul was primarily talking about his experience as a Jew who struggled to obey the Law before he was a Christian. For he gives the solution to struggling with sin at the end of the chapter. That solution is Jesus Christ. For he says, thank God thru Jesus Christ. Also, if Paul was talking from his experience as a Christian, then we would have a contradiction in Scripture. For in Romans 7:14, Paul says he is sold under sin. Yet, in Romans 8:1, Paul says he is free from sin. So which is it? Does Paul have a split personality? Now, you may not be OSAS, but I can tell you what the OSAS proponent will think in this situation, though. For they think Romans 7:25 is their solution. They think it says that a believer can sin in the flesh and yet in their spirit they do not sin. However, if that was true then why does Romans 8:1 say that if we walk after the Spirit (And not after the flesh) you are not under the Condemnation? How does the OSAS proponent get around Romans 8:1 with the thinking they can walk after the flesh and yet not be under the Condemnation? For Romans 8:13 says that if one walks after the flesh, they will die.
In Romans chapter 7, Paul was primarily talking about his experience as a Jew who struggled to obey the Law before he was a Christian. For he gives the solution to struggling with sin at the end of the chapter. That solution is Jesus Christ. For he says, thank God thru Jesus Christ. Also, if Paul was talking from his experience as a Christian, then we would have a contradiction in Scripture. For in Romans 7:14, Paul says he is sold under sin. Yet, in Romans 8:1, Paul says he is free from sin. So which is it? Does Paul have a split personality? Now, you may not be OSAS, but I can tell you what the OSAS proponent will think in this situation, though. For they think Romans 7:25 is their solution. They think it says that a believer can sin in the flesh and yet in their spirit they do not sin. However, if that was true then why does Romans 8:1 say that if we walk after the Spirit (And not after the flesh) you are not under the Condemnation? How does the OSAS proponent get around Romans 8:1 with the thinking they can walk after the flesh and yet not be under the Condemnation? For Romans 8:13 says that if one walks after the flesh, they will die.