Which statement is true?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Which Statement is true?

  • John 10:27-29

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hebrews 6:4-6

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • They are both true

    Votes: 23 100.0%
  • God can't seem to make up His mind so why should I?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    23
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I'm surprised that you would cite this verse to support your position:

I Corinthians chapter 6 verses 19 and 20

What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.


Why am I surprised? Well, because Paul had just finished saying the following in relation to our same bodies or in relation to the same temples of the Holy Ghost:

I Corinthians chapter 3 verses 16 and 17

Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.


What do you understand that to mean?

Is God destroying us a good thing?


yes it is, because unless God destroys our flesh, we are useless to him.

As the bible says, he will continue to sanctify those whom he has perfected.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Both scriptures are true. NO ONE can snatch you from the Father's hand. But YOU can choose to leave. His sheep follow Him of their own free will, they are not forced to follow Him.

yeah but scripture says his sheep hear his voice, they know it, and they follow him when he comes after them.

a sheep who does not return does not return because they were never his to begin with. That is why they did not recognise his voice and follow after him.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Amen to that and I might add...FOREVER....according to Hebrews that is!
yes, he has perfected forever those who are in the process of being sanctified.

Part of sanctification is chastening, which is destroying our flesh. especially if we resist. A loving parent continues to push against resistance, knowing that resistance will eventually br broken, and thats a good thing.
 
G

Gr8grace

Guest
Gr8grace,


Heb 5:1-3 begins to set the context for Heb 6:4-6 in that it shows the Levitical High Priest as having to continually offer sacrifices not only for the ongoing sins of the people; but also for himself.

Heb 5:5-9 explains the superiority of Jesus' High Priesthood:

Verses 5-6 show the superiority of Jesus' calling.

verses 7-9 show the superiority of Jesus' atonement in that offered once its efficacy was perpetual.

Heb 5:11-14 are a rebuke to the recipients of the letter; in which, they are described as immature and lacking understanding.

Heb 6:1-2 state the core issue the author is addressing; namely: relaying the foundation of repentance and faith, etc.

Hebrews 6:4-6 is a statement that having once repented and come to faith; it is impossible that such response would ever need to be nor could ever be repeated.
Thanks Brother. It seems we are saying the same thing just with different words. It was my fault, because I was going to respond back to you after my initial response.

I know better than to just "skim" over your posts and I did with that post. I apologize.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
yes, he has perfected forever those who are in the process of being sanctified.

Part of sanctification is chastening, which is destroying our flesh. especially if we resist. A loving parent continues to push against resistance, knowing that resistance will eventually br broken, and thats a good thing.
I am glad the Lord has fired my rear up a few times for sure.......shows true sonship ;)
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Thanks Brother. It seems we are saying the same thing just with different words. It was my fault, because I was going to respond back to you after my initial response.

I know better than to just "skim" over your posts and I did with that post. I apologize.
No apology required. You asked for clarification (very politely) and I attempted to give it.
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest


yes it is, because unless God destroys our flesh, we are useless to him.
If you honestly believe that this is what Paul was saying, then I honestly wouldn't even know where to begin in trying to reason with you. I'll just pray for you.

Good night.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
If you honestly believe that this is what Paul was saying, then I honestly wouldn't even know where to begin in trying to reason with you. I'll just pray for you.

Good night.

well if you do not think your flesh needs purged, and think you have made some spiritual place where you no longer need to grow. because you have defeated sin. Then your in trouble.
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
what is an antichrist. but one who denys christ. It appears your family are now antichrist.

You yell and scream and mock people who believe in eternal security, and say we interpret the bible only the way it fits our belief.

Yet the bible speaks of your family. And those who once claimed to be saved, and part of the church, but now DENY CHRIST.


[SUP]18 [/SUP]Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the[SUP][c][/SUP] Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour. [SUP]19 [/SUP]They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.

[SUP]20 [/SUP]But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and you know all things.[SUP][d][/SUP] [SUP]21 [/SUP]I have not written to you because you do not know the truth, but because you know it, and that no lie is of the truth.
[SUP]22 [/SUP]Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son. [SUP]23 [/SUP]Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who acknowledges the Son has the Father also.


So instead of mocking things you do not understand, and saying we do not listen to the word. Why do you not listen to the word. For John tells us about your family, you may not believe us, maybe you will believe him.

Yes this is harsh, and yes it hurts like heck (my brother and sister are the same way) But biblical truth is still biblical truth no matter how bad it hurts our pride.

My apologies, I do not mean to mock or belittle anyone. My motives are purely to end the bickering that Paul tells us not to partake in. I will confess to a sarcastic sense of humor and if that offended you I again apologize. I guess it was a little flippant there once.

I would argue that you my friend are the one who misunderstands. But, been there done that time to move on. Between the two of us again, it's a moot subject. But I pray the Lord bring you one who is so considering. Apostasy is NOT a hypothetical situation.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,132
13,143
113
58
Isaiah talks about how believers had once (in their past life) had went astray like sheep.

"All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all." (Isaiah 53:6).

This gives a picture that sheep can once be in an unsaved or lost state.
Isaiah said we ALL "like sheep" have gone astray and turned every one to his own way. Prior to salvation we were ALL in an unsaved or lost state. This is not descriptive of His sheep who He knows that hear His voice and follow Him and He gives them eternal life and they shall never perish or be plucked from His hand (John 10:27-28). In Matthew 15:24, Jesus said - "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Just because they are called "sheep" (lost sheep that is) does not mean that these lost sheep of the house of Israel are His sheep described in John 10:27-28 or that they were ever saved to begin with.

In addition, Jesus says he has come to save that which was lost, and that he will leave the 99 sheep in order to find that one sheep that has been lost. Now, think about that for a second. Is the sheep that was lost a type of sheep that is following Jesus? No.
Then it must not be His sheep described in John 10:27-28 because Jesus said His sheep follow Him. Jesus did not say that some of His sheep follow Him and some of them don't. His sheep hear his voice, He knows them, they follow Him, they will never perish or be snatched from His hand. - ETERNAL SECURITY.

But no doubt your probably think this sheep is going to naturally come back or it will be forced back against it's will to follow the Master. But this is not what we read by the words of Jesus, though. Jesus says that if He finds that sheep he will then rejoice. But Jesus also uses the word "if" here, too; Which does not imply a guarantee that he will find this one sheep that has been lost or gone astray. Anyways, you can check out the words of Jesus saying this in Matthew 18:11-13 here,

11 For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.
12 How think you? if a man has a hundred sheep, and one of them be gone astray, does he not leave the ninety and nine, and go into the mountains, and seek that which is gone astray?
13 And if so be that he finds it, verily I say unto you, he rejoices more for that sheep, than for the ninety and nine which went not astray.

If....so...be...that....he....finds...it.
In context, we see that the Pharisees and Teachers of the Law were muttering among themselves, criticizing the Lord for fraternizing with sinners. The "so-called" righteous people of the day placed little or no value on the lives of sinners (even though they were self righteous sinners themselves) believing their behavior had rendered them undeserving of any effort toward reconciliation. So Jesus told them this parable to explain God’s view that sinners are actually of urgent importance to Him. That was the point of the parable and not a loss of salvation. On one occasion Jesus told them that He had come to seek and save the lost (Luke 19:10), and on another that it was the sick that needed a doctor, not the healthy. I have not come to call the righteous, He said, but sinners, to repentance (Luke 5:31-32). Jesus is not giving the Pharisees and Teachers of the Law a lesson on losing salvation and gaining it back as you suppose. That was not their issue. Their issue was they were sinners who needed to repent and become saved.

Well, I do not know about you, but that doesn't sound like Eternal Security to me.
"On the surface," after ignoring the context, those verses don't sound like they are in harmony with John 10:27-28, just like "on the surface," after ignoring the context, James 2:24 doesn't sound like it's in harmony with Ephesians 2:8,9 - "saved through faith, not works" but that is not the case either. So John 10:27-28 still stands. - My sheep hear My voice, (not some of them do and some of them don't) and I know them, (not some of them He knows and some of them He doesn't know) and they follow Me (not some of them follow Him and some of them don't). And I give them eternal life, (not He gives eternal life to some of them and some of them He doesn't) and they shall never perish; (not some of them will never perish but some of them will) neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand (not some of them will be snatched from His hand and some of them will not be). I got off that roller coaster ride of fear and bondage to IN-security after my conversion when I left the Roman Catholic church several years ago so you will just have to remain on that ride without me.
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
Isaiah said we ALL "like sheep" have gone astray and turned every one to his own way. Prior to salvation we were ALL in an unsaved or lost state. This is not descriptive of His sheep who He knows that hear His voice and follow Him and He gives them eternal life and they shall never perish or be plucked from His hand (John 10:27-28). In Matthew 15:24, Jesus said - "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Just because they are called "sheep" (lost sheep that is) does not mean that these lost sheep of the house of Israel are His sheep described in John 10:27-28 or that they were ever saved to begin with.

Then it must not be His sheep described in John 10:27-28 because Jesus said His sheep follow Him. Jesus did not say that some of His sheep follow Him and some of them don't. His sheep hear his voice, He knows them, they follow Him, they will never perish or be snatched from His hand. - ETERNAL SECURITY.

In context, we see that the Pharisees and Teachers of the Law were muttering among themselves, criticizing the Lord for fraternizing with sinners. The "so-called" righteous people of the day placed little or no value on the lives of sinners (even though they were self righteous sinners themselves) believing their behavior had rendered them undeserving of any effort toward reconciliation. So Jesus told them this parable to explain God’s view that sinners are actually of urgent importance to Him. That was the point of the parable and not a loss of salvation. On one occasion Jesus told them that He had come to seek and save the lost (Luke 19:10), and on another that it was the sick that needed a doctor, not the healthy. I have not come to call the righteous, He said, but sinners, to repentance (Luke 5:31-32). Jesus is not giving the Pharisees and Teachers of the Law a lesson on losing salvation and gaining it back as you suppose. That was not their issue. Their issue was they were sinners who needed to repent and become saved.

"On the surface," after ignoring the context, those verses don't sound like they are in harmony with John 10:27-28, just like "on the surface," after ignoring the context, James 2:24 doesn't sound like it's in harmony with Ephesians 2:8,9 - "saved through faith, not works" but that is not the case either. So John 10:27-28 still stands. - My sheep hear My voice, (not some of them do and some of them don't) and I know them, (not some of them He knows and some of them He doesn't know) and they follow Me (not some of them follow Him and some of them don't). And I give them eternal life, (not He gives eternal life to some of them and some of them He doesn't) and they shall never perish; (not some of them will never perish but some of them will) neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand (not some of them will be snatched from His hand and some of them will not be). I got off that roller coaster ride of fear and bondage to IN-security after my conversion when I left the Roman Catholic church several years ago so you will just have to remain on that ride without me.
Although I disagree with your take on eternal security, we do seem to have similar beliefs in relation to the lost sheep. In other words, like you, I don't see where they had to have been saved at some point in time prior to being referred to as being lost sheep.
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
Hebrews 6 is teaching by hyperbole. The statement if I could un-ring the bell does not mean that a bell can be un-rung. It only implies that if I un-ring the bell I never rang it in the first place.

That is a classic difference between meat and milk.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
In the Greek text, there is NO conditional (if) included in Heb 6 verses 4-6!

Verses 4-6 set forth a hypothetical scenario which is labeled with a blanket statement of impossibility!
I'll save y'all a big headache. Here's the simple truth:

Hebrews 6:4-6 isn’t presenting a possibility, but an IMPOSSIBILITY!

The writer is making a point that they were misunderstanding Jesus Christ. The writer is NOT saying that enlightened ones can fall away, but instead was describing their confusion. He is showing how their return to trying to make atonements and giving sacrifices for their sins is basically saying sacrifices are again demanded. In other words, they think it’s possible to fall away and need to be renewed again. WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE for those who are born again!

Why is it impossible?
Because what Jesus said in John 10:27-29: “I gave them eternal life and they shall never perish. My Father gave them Me. No man (that means YOU!) is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.”

Preacher's Outline & Sermon Bible- Commentary
1. (6:4-5) Warning— Believers: the believer's great privileges. It is difficult to see how these five experiences could be said about a person unless he was a true believer. Being as honest and objective as possible, we would have to strain the meaning to make them apply to anyone else. The Greek Scripture definitely uses the aorist tense which means that the person had a once-for-all experience, an experience that was once-for-all completed, fulfilled, and finished. How could this apply to anyone else other than a believer? Note how each of these read in the aorist tense: the person...
was once-for-all enlightened
had once-for-all tasted of the heavenly gift
was once-for-all made a partaker of the Holy Spirit
had once-for-all tasted of the good Word of God
had once-for-all tasted of the power of the world to come.
The word "tasted" (geusamenous[SUP]PWS: 3896[/SUP]) means to partake of, to take in, to experience, to come to know. The Greek scholar Marvin Vincent says that it means to "have consciously partaken of" (Word Studies In The New Testament, Vol. 4, p.445). The very same word is used of Christ when it said that He "tasted death" for us (Hebrews 2:9). And one thing is sure: Christ tasted, that is, consciously experienced, death for us. Therefore, this passage must mean that this person fully tasted and fully experienced salvation. As stated, it seems that we have to twist Scripture to make it say any less than a conscious and full experience. Note the glorious experiences and privileges these persons received in Christ.
1. They were once-for-all enlightened. Enlightened means the light of the gospel and of salvation; the light of Christ, that is, seeing Christ as the Savior and Lord of men; the light of salvation that breaks through the darkness of sin and death. Note: receiving the light happened once-for-all. It was an actual experience of the people, a once-for-all experience. That is, it really happened and it was fulfilled and completed in the people's lives. They received the light of Christ, of His gospel and salvation once-for-all.
2. They had tasted of the heavenly gift. The "heavenly gift" refers to Christ and His salvation which God gave to the world. Scripture proclaims time and again that Jesus Christ and His salvation are God's gifts.
⇒ Christ is God's "unspeakable gift" (2 Cor. 9:15).
⇒ Christ is God's gift to a lost world (John 3:16).
⇒ Salvation is "the gift of God" (Ephes. 2:8-9).
⇒ Christ is the One who came down out of heaven as the gift of God to a lost world (John 3:13; John 3:16; John 3:31-32; John 6:32-33, and a host of other verses. See notes—[SUP]•[/SUP] John 3:32-34; Deeper Study #3—John 3:34 for more references and discussion.)
Note that this is again a once-for-all experience. They had experienced Christ and His salvation once-for-all.
3. They were once-for-all made a partaker of the Holy Spirit. The word "partaker" (metochous) means to share as partners. W.E. Vine says that it means "the fact of sharing" (Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words. Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H. Revell, 1966, p.162). The Greek scholar A.T Robertson says, "These are all given as actual spiritual experiences" (Word Pictures In The New Testament, Vol. 5, p.375). These people were sharers in the Holy Spirit. It is very difficult to see how they can be made to be a false profession without straining the Scripture.
4. They had once-for-all tasted God's good Word. This is the gospel of Christ, of His glorious salvation. The Greek scholar Marvin Vincent says that this means that they received...
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]• life (Acts 5:20)
• the Holy Spirit (John 3:34; Acts 5:32; Acts 10:44; Ephes. 6:17; Hebrews 2:4)[/TD]
[TD="width: 165"]• cleansing (Ephes. 5:26).
• spirit and life (John 6:63)
• salvation (Acts 11:14)[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
(Word Studies In The New Testament, Vol. 4, p.445.)
5. They had once-for-all tasted the powers of the world to come. They had experienced some of heaven upon earth. They had actually experienced the presence and power of Christ in their lives...
• the power of Christ in conquering the trials and temptations and sufferings of this world.
• the healing power of Christ in touching both their bodies and spirits.

"And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us" (1 John 3:24).
"Hereby know we that we dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit" (1 John 4:13).
Preacher's Outline and Sermon Bible - Commentary - The Preacher's Outline & Sermon Bible – Hebrew, James.

It's plain as the nose on your face where the confusion is. It seems the only thing you can agree on is that it's not literal, which it is.
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0


yes it is, because unless God destroys our flesh, we are useless to him.

As the bible says, he will continue to sanctify those whom he has perfected.
You've gotta be kidding..... what kind of idiot would believe such a statement? Or put their "likes" on it?

Read very carefully......
1 Corinthians 3:17 (NASB) If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him, for the temple of God is holy, and that is what you are.

1 Corinthians 3:17 (NRSV) If anyone destroys God's temple, God will destroy that person. For God's temple is holy, and you are that temple.

1 Corinthians 3:17 (NLT) God will destroy anyone who destroys this temple. For God’s temple is holy, and you are that temple.

H O W did you get such a ridiculous interpretation outta that? That was one desperate move..... which makes it look like you will say anything as long as it get folks to believe in OSAS.

H O W will you justify such poor teaching to God..... or do you even care?

And to the "likers"..... I thought you were educated enough to know better. I was wrong.

Really..... you guys believe the readers are that gullible? That's insulting.
:rolleyes:
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
You've gotta be kidding..... what kind of idiot would believe such a statement? Or put their "likes" on it?

Read very carefully......
1 Corinthians 3:17 (NASB) If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him, for the temple of God is holy, and that is what you are.

1 Corinthians 3:17 (NRSV) If anyone destroys God's temple, God will destroy that person. For God's temple is holy, and you are that temple.

1 Corinthians 3:17 (NLT) God will destroy anyone who destroys this temple. For God’s temple is holy, and you are that temple.

H O W did you get such a ridiculous interpretation outta that? That was one desperate move..... which makes it look like you will say anything as long as it get folks to believe in OSAS.

H O W will you justify such poor teaching to God..... or do you even care?

And to the "likers"..... I thought you were educated enough to know better. I was wrong.

Really..... you guys believe the readers are that gullible? That's insulting.
:rolleyes:
Could he not be referencing the fact that we are to crucify the flesh daily and seek to serve in the newness of spirit? Die to self daily and take up our cross? Along these lines of thought???
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
Gr8grace,


Heb 5:1-3 begins to set the context for Heb 6:4-6 in that it shows the Levitical High Priest as having to continually offer sacrifices not only for the ongoing sins of the people; but also for himself.

Heb 5:5-9 explains the superiority of Jesus' High Priesthood:

Verses 5-6 show the superiority of Jesus' calling.

verses 7-9 show the superiority of Jesus' atonement in that offered once its efficacy was perpetual.

Heb 5:11-14 are a rebuke to the recipients of the letter; in which, they are described as immature and lacking understanding.

Heb 6:1-2 state the core issue the author is addressing; namely: relaying the foundation of repentance and faith, etc.

Hebrews 6:4-6 is a statement that having once repented and come to faith; it is impossible that such response would ever need to be nor could ever be repeated.
Please read:
Hebrews 6:4-6 (NASB) [SUP]4 [/SUP]For in the case of those who have once been enlightened and have tasted of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit, [SUP]5 [/SUP]and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, [SUP]6 [/SUP]and then have fallen away, it is impossible to renew them again to repentance, since they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to open shame.

Hebrews 6:4-6 (NRSV) [SUP]4 [/SUP]For it is impossible to restore again to repentance those who have once been enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, [SUP]5 [/SUP]and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, [SUP]6 [/SUP]and then have fallen away, since on their own they are crucifying again the Son of God and are holding him up to contempt.

Hebrews 6:4-6 (NLT) [SUP]4 [/SUP]For it is impossible to bring back to repentance those who were once enlightened—those who have experienced the good things of heaven and shared in the Holy Spirit, [SUP]5 [/SUP]who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the power of the age to come— [SUP]6 [/SUP]and who then turn away from God. It is impossible to bring such people back to repentance; by rejecting the Son of God, they themselves are nailing him to the cross once again and holding him up to public shame.

Any internet theologian or armchair preacher could get on the net & find out what you're saying is false. How can you be led by the Spirit of God & not see the plain-as-day literal interpretation?

I would be afraid to say such things after reading how many false prophets in the OT were killed by divine judgement.

IMO, I think a plain 'ole sinner man could see enough in this scripture to know what some of it means. Sheesh.
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
Could he not be referencing the fact that we are to crucify the flesh daily and seek to serve in the newness of spirit? Die to self daily and take up our cross? Along these lines of thought???
NOT AT ALL.
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
Amen.

Some people will employ such scriptural gymnastics to try to support their error that it's a wonder they haven't thrown out their backs in the process.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
Amen.

Some people will employ such scriptural gymnastics to try to support their error that it's a wonder they haven't thrown out their backs in the process.

Of course your right and all you years of study give you complete understanding right....you have the market cornered on the word and are all that and a bag of chips when it comes to understanding hey?