While there may be a legal definition of rape that this could satisfy, I think it is a mistake to say that any case where there is self-blame, feelings of guilt, and an attempt to refuse sex is genuinely rape. People who refuse sex for a bit, then change their mind in order to get around some pressure, are not raped. They may have been in an uncomfortable situation. And it may have been wrong for them to be pressured in the first place. But they still need to say "no" all the way through the ordeal.
If your husband, for instance, comes to you and says, "I was raped. A lady tried to seduce me. I said 'no' three times. Then, to get her off my back and because she really wanted to, I finally just went with it," you probably wouldn't say that he is blameless. You'd probably ask, --"Did she have a gun?" "No." --"Did she use a knife?" "No." --"Did she overpower you?" "No." --"So what happened?" "Well, she tried to seduce me, and she didn't stop after I said 'no' three times. So, I went with it." --"You mean there was no force, threats, or anything, and you voluntarily allowed this?" "Yeah. I mean, I was uncomfortable with it, though. And I didn't really want to, but I just didn't want it bad enough to say 'no' a fourth and fifth time." Etc. That just doesn't free from all blame. And no self-respecting wife or husband would say they're spouse is completely blameless because someone persistently and successfully seduced them, using no force, threats, or anything like it.
Don't get me wrong. What the guy did to our new sister in Christ was vile and wicked, and he has greater responsibility for what happened than she does. But that doesn't mean that she is literally blameless, nor does it mean that he raped her. Praise God, however, that there's abundant mercy in Christ for all sin, including sexual sin. I think our focus should be on praising God for His grace in her life, rather than trying to convince her that she is 100% blameless and that the guy should get a rep as a rapist.
If your husband, for instance, comes to you and says, "I was raped. A lady tried to seduce me. I said 'no' three times. Then, to get her off my back and because she really wanted to, I finally just went with it," you probably wouldn't say that he is blameless. You'd probably ask, --"Did she have a gun?" "No." --"Did she use a knife?" "No." --"Did she overpower you?" "No." --"So what happened?" "Well, she tried to seduce me, and she didn't stop after I said 'no' three times. So, I went with it." --"You mean there was no force, threats, or anything, and you voluntarily allowed this?" "Yeah. I mean, I was uncomfortable with it, though. And I didn't really want to, but I just didn't want it bad enough to say 'no' a fourth and fifth time." Etc. That just doesn't free from all blame. And no self-respecting wife or husband would say they're spouse is completely blameless because someone persistently and successfully seduced them, using no force, threats, or anything like it.
Don't get me wrong. What the guy did to our new sister in Christ was vile and wicked, and he has greater responsibility for what happened than she does. But that doesn't mean that she is literally blameless, nor does it mean that he raped her. Praise God, however, that there's abundant mercy in Christ for all sin, including sexual sin. I think our focus should be on praising God for His grace in her life, rather than trying to convince her that she is 100% blameless and that the guy should get a rep as a rapist.