I sure do and I've shared them in a number of lengthy posts on this forum which can use the search feature to pull up and read.
"Like a muddied spring or a polluted fountain is a righteous man who gives way before the wicked." -Proverbs 25:26
As the eminent Biblical scholar and theologian
Gleason L. Archer PhD wrote in the Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties:
"How could God be called 'good' if He forbade His people to protect their wives from ravishment and strangulation by drunken marauders, or to resist invaders who have come to pick up their children and dash out their brains against the wall? No policy would give freer rein to wickedness and crime than a complete surrender of the right of self-defense on the part of the law-abiding members of society.
No more effective way of promoting the cause of Satan and the powers of hell could be devised than depriving law-abiding citizens of all right of self-defense. It is hard to imagine how any deity could be thought 'good' who would ordain such a policy of supine surrender to evil as that advocated by pacifism.
All possibility of an ordered society would be removed on the abolition of any sort of police force. No nation could retain its liberty or preserve the lives of its citizens if it were prevented from maintaining any sort of army for its defense. It is therefore incumbent on a 'good God' to include the right of self-defense as the prerogative of His people. He would not be good at all if He were to turn the world over to the horrors of unbridled cruelty perpetrated by violent and bloody criminals or the unchecked aggression of invading armies.
Not only is a proper and responsible policy of self-defense taught by Scripture from Genesis to Revelation, but there were occasions when God even commissioned His people to carry out judgment on corrupt and degenerate heathen nations and the complete extermination of cities like Jericho (cf. the article on "Was Joshua justified in exterminating the population of Jericho?" in connection with Joshua 6:21). The rules of war laid down in Deuteronomy 20 represented a control of justice, fairness, and kindness in the use of the sword, and, as such, they truly did reflect the goodness of God."
Though I won't be going into great detail right now friend as I'm working on a couple of other issues at the moment, self-defense against evil is legitimized in both scripture and natural law.
For example, though we don't know if Jesus owned a sword or not, we do know that he took assertive action on more than one occasion that included driving
all of the money changers
and their livestock from the temple with a whip of cords overturning their tables and spilling their coin onto the ground as He did so (
John 2:15) to speaking with the supernatural power of God while being arrested in a manner which so overwhelmed the soldiers that they swayed backward and fell to the ground (
John 18:6).
The latter accomplished several things but primarily it created a situation in which the soldiers were so put off by this demonstration of supernatural power that His disciples could leave the garden unharmed with their weapons in hand to use in legitimate self-defense against highway men, etc... if the need arose (and maybe it did) as Jesus was now physically separating from them to fulfill his prophesied cosmic mission at Golgotha.
I recommend you read '
A Time to Kill: The Myth of Christian Pacifism' by Justice Greg Hopkins.
Thank you for answer... do you have some christian writings or sources from New testament where I can see that? Where christians fought with weapons to defend their faith/lives against Jews or Romans.