P
And how would this pertain to the topic?
If there is any question it should be of your position. You are the one that has accepted a false teaching. You have not given a shred of evidence that premillennialism has ever been the teaching of scripture.
No Church from Pentecost to the time of the Reformation has ever held a premillennial view - Orthodox, Oriential Orthodox and the Roman Catholic Church. It is an express heresy of historical Christianity. None of the Reformers held this view, Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, Knox and Wesley. No Protestant denonimation of any stripe held this view until the early 19th century. It was begun in England with Darby with Miller and Scofield in America. The only group that holds this view today, as far as I can tell, are the Seventh-Day Adventists, who developed from the Millerites and the Evangelicals who tie themselves to Dallas Theological Seminary where Lindsey, Walvoord and Ryrie hale and the followers of Hagee and Impe.
That hardly has the historical understanding of scripture from the beginning without change and being preserved by the Holy Spirit. What it does exemplify is a man made theory imposed upon scripture because of misunderstanding/interpretation.
Anyone can hold this view, but it cannot be claimed as part of historical Christianity. It is purely a modern man made/developed theory imposed on scripture.
If there is any question it should be of your position. You are the one that has accepted a false teaching. You have not given a shred of evidence that premillennialism has ever been the teaching of scripture.
No Church from Pentecost to the time of the Reformation has ever held a premillennial view - Orthodox, Oriential Orthodox and the Roman Catholic Church. It is an express heresy of historical Christianity. None of the Reformers held this view, Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, Knox and Wesley. No Protestant denonimation of any stripe held this view until the early 19th century. It was begun in England with Darby with Miller and Scofield in America. The only group that holds this view today, as far as I can tell, are the Seventh-Day Adventists, who developed from the Millerites and the Evangelicals who tie themselves to Dallas Theological Seminary where Lindsey, Walvoord and Ryrie hale and the followers of Hagee and Impe.
That hardly has the historical understanding of scripture from the beginning without change and being preserved by the Holy Spirit. What it does exemplify is a man made theory imposed upon scripture because of misunderstanding/interpretation.
Anyone can hold this view, but it cannot be claimed as part of historical Christianity. It is purely a modern man made/developed theory imposed on scripture.
That explains your constant reference to those you deify,and those you demonized.
With out man and the deification thereof you have no doctrine.
Last edited: