Looks like you are somewhat read up on anti-dispensational dogma.
But your ad hominem against Darby by using Irving and McDonald is unproven.
Sticking to Scriptural proof of what you actually believe rather than only attacking the stance of another will give you more mileage...but it may also open your view to attacks as well, but at least you will be more credible.
But your ad hominem against Darby by using Irving and McDonald is unproven.
Sticking to Scriptural proof of what you actually believe rather than only attacking the stance of another will give you more mileage...but it may also open your view to attacks as well, but at least you will be more credible.
http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/5660-scriptures-prove-post-trib-rapture.html