Revelation Timeline

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
G

GaryA

Guest
Zechariah 6:

[SUP]12[/SUP] And speak unto him, saying, Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The BRANCH; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the
temple of the LORD: [SUP]13[/SUP] Even he shall build the temple of the LORD; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne: and the counsel of peace shall be between them both.


This 'temple of the LORD' is talking about the 'spiritual' temple - not a 'physical' one...

:)
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
So -- you are saying that the 'man of sin' will sit in a temple built by Jesus - AFTER the second coming of Christ?????

As in:

~ First - Jesus returns.
~ Then - Jesus builds a temple.
~ Then - the 'man of sin' sits in that temple, claiming to be God?

What about this?:


2 Thessalonians 2:

[SUP]3[/SUP] Let no man deceive you by any means: for
that day shall not come, { the second coming of Christ } except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; [SUP]4[/SUP] Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.



:)
You WELL KNOW that's not what I'm saying!

I'm not going to answer your further posts, because you have turned to slandering, just because what I showed you per Scripture.

Preterism and Historicism are BOTH dead ends! They are just as bad as man's pre-trib rapture doctrines, simply because they don't rightly divide The Scriptures.
 
G

GaryA

Guest
Moreover, the throne of David, which our Lord Jesus is to inherit per God's Word, is not in Heaven. David's throne is an earthly throne, and our Lord Jesus is to return to claim that throne, on earth.
I Agree.

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
You WELL KNOW that's not what I'm saying!

I'm not going to answer your further posts, because you have turned to slandering, ...
"That's not slander -- it's an honest question. What you wrote -- that's the way it came across to me..."

So -- you are saying that the 'man of sin' will sit in a temple built by Jesus - AFTER the second coming of Christ?????
:)
 
Last edited:

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
"That's not slander -- it's an honest question. What you wrote -- that's the way it came across to me..."


:)
And you claim I don't read YOUR... posts!

Try reading what I covered, again. There is NO WAY you can get an idea like Jesus builds the temple that the "man of sin" comes to sit in from what I wrote!
 
G

GaryA

Guest
They are just as bad as man's pre-trib rapture doctrines, simply because they don't rightly divide The Scriptures.
Do we not agree on 'post-trib'?

The question is --- are you truly interested in understanding my point of view -- or, is your only aim to 'rebuke' me for having a different point of view?

:)
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
"That's not slander -- it's an honest question. What you wrote -- that's the way it came across to me..."

:)
It's obvious you did not... bother to read what I said here from that earlier post:

"So, who... builds this next temple on earth to 'try' and fulfill that Zech.6 Scripture in the minds of the orthodox Jews? It won't be our Lord Jesus, for we know He will build God's true Temple for His Millennium reign when He comes later to destroy that "man of sin" with "the brightness of His coming."(2 Thess.2:8)."
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
Do we not agree on 'post-trib'?

The question is --- are you truly interested in understanding my point of view -- or, is your only aim to 'rebuke' me for having a different point of view?

:)
I believe in a post-tribulational one-time coming of our Lord Jesus to gather His Church. Is that plain enough?

But I do NOT... hold to the Preterist nor Historicist views of Bible prophecy.

The Matt.24:1-3 verses are NOT about the destruction of the 2nd temple by the Romans. That prophecy is reserved for the very end when Jesus returns to destroy... the standing "temple of God" which Paul proclaimed in 2 Thess.2:4 the "man of sin" will sit and play God. That "temple of God" phrase in 2 Thess.2:4 is Apostle Paul's not mine!

You're only showing a madness with thinking that the phrase "temple of God" must always mean a clean temple sanctioned by God Himself. God is not... going bring back the old covenant worship.

Even the mention of sacrifices in the Ezekiel temple no longer represents literal animal sacrifices, but our love for The Father and The Son as our sacrifice in that future time. And don't try to tell me the Ezekiel 40 thru 48 Chapters are all past history too, for they have NEVER happened to this day!
 
G

GaryA

Guest
There is NO WAY you can get an idea like Jesus builds the temple that the "man of sin" comes to sit in from what I wrote!
Perhaps --- "my bad" --- I apologize.

So -- I guess we are "even"...?
:D


"Let us both back up a minute - take a deep breath - and ..."


:)
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
Perhaps --- "my bad" --- I apologize.

So -- I guess we are "even"...?
:D


"Let us both back up a minute - take a deep breath - and ..."


:)
I won't hold it against you, if that's what you mean.
 
G

GaryA

Guest
I believe in a post-tribulational one-time coming of our Lord Jesus to gather His Church. Is that plain enough? { I am assuming that you also mean to say that when Jesus comes - he stays - and sets up His 1000-year reign. If so, then - I agree. }

But I do NOT... hold to the Preterist nor Historicist views of Bible prophecy.

The Matt.24:1-3 verses are NOT about the destruction of the 2nd temple by the Romans. { I disagree. What Jesus is "alluding to" in verse 2 is the destruction in 70 A.D.; however, the answer Jesus gives to the two questions in verse 3 covers ~2000 years. } That prophecy is reserved for the very end when Jesus returns to destroy... the standing "temple of God" which Paul proclaimed in 2 Thess.2:4 the "man of sin" will sit and play God. That "temple of God" phrase in 2 Thess.2:4 is Apostle Paul's not mine!

You're only showing a madness with thinking that the phrase "temple of God" must always mean a clean temple sanctioned by God Himself. God is not... going bring back the old covenant worship. { I did not say [ all of ] that... }

Even the mention of sacrifices in the Ezekiel temple no longer represents literal animal sacrifices, but our love for The Father and The Son as our sacrifice in that future time. And don't try to tell me the Ezekiel 40 thru 48 Chapters are all past history too, for they have NEVER happened to this day! { I have not said that... }
"We will just have to agree to disagree agreeably..." :D ;) :cool:

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
I won't hold it against you, if that's what you mean.
"I have nothing against you --- I am just trying to have a discussion..."

However, it is not going to get anywhere "in leaps and bounds" -- discussions of this nature have to be "inched along" - one-step-at-a-time - to be of any real value.

( Which is THE most-major-problem with threads in this Forum. No one seems to want to discuss anything with 'focus' on the 'detail'. Everyone wants to "race ahead" by writing two sentences and then declaring it to be 'proof' of the whole matter... )

Some things have to be discussed "at length" to truly get a proper understanding...

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
In other words, that it is a real, actual, bonifide, God-approved temple -- in the same way that the first two temples were.
"I'm sorry --- I did not mean for this to be misleading..." :eek:

I believe that the 'temple' that Revelation 11:1 is referring to is the second temple, which was destroyed in 70 A.D.

I do not believe that there will be a third temple built. Yes - I believe that the Jews want to build it -- that I will not dispute. However, I do not believe that God will let them build it before the return of Christ.

:)
 
P

planitsoon

Guest
Everything hangs on Daniel 9, the 70 weeks. let me explain.

Every prophecy teacher will always comes back to the foundational part of Daniel 9 so that's why it is so important to look at the foundation first...

Daniel 9:25 "Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One (Jesus), the ruler, comes, there will be seven 'sevens,' and sixty-two 'sevens. It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble. (reference to Nehemiah and the rebuilding of the wall)

There are 490 years, the 70 sevens. From the time of the commandment to go back and to rebuild and restore Jerusalem, that is recorded is the seventh chapter of the book of Ezra where the King of Persia send Ezra back to rebuild and restore Jerusalem. That year was the autum of 457BC. That's when Daniels prophecy begins. It ends 490 years later. When you go from BC into AD you go all the way over into the autum of AD34. 457BC to AD34 is the time period of un-interrupted chronological time. You must understand, this is so important. Daniel prophecy is 70 weeks, covers a times period of un interrupted chronological time, 457BC when Ezra went back (Ezra 7) all the way over to the stoning of Stephen in Acts 7.

What you must understand is verse 26

"Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined.

It is pretty evident that that was when prince Titus came in and destroyed the city of Jerusalem, the Jewish wars 66AD until AD70.

One reason the enemy has muddled the waters is because if our Jewish friends all over the world would have understood this scripture they would have seen that the Messiah had to come before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. Scofield, Larken, Moody say there are two princes in this chapter but you will see there is only One.

From the time that Ezra went back in 457BC unto Jesus coming down into the Jordan river to be baptized by John was 483 years. That's how Daniel says it.

"Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks:"
That is 69 weeks of 483 years.

From Ezra going back until the public of the anouncement of Messiah the prince where the Father spoke from heaven, Matthew 3:17: " This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased".

Please get this...

From Ezra's day, down to the time when Jesus came to be baptised was 483 years, and the 69th week ended when He stepped in the water.
The 70th week began when He came out of the water and for the next 3,5 years the first half of the 70th week, was Jesus public ministry.
The last 3,5 years of the 70th week Jesus still moved through the apostles by the power of the Holy Spirit in Jerusalem among the Jews.

Jesus death, burrial, resurrection, assension and the consequent coming of the Holy Spirit to empower the church is what I call the very pivit of human history and nothing more important than that. And all this happened during Daniels 70th week! From AD27 to AD34. It was the public ministry of Jesus Christ and the first seven chapters of the book of Acts.

Now the most important verse of all.

Verse 27.
"And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate".

The end of verse 26, the war that came and the Jewish that came was prophesied by Jesus Himself at the end of Matthew 23, "Behold your house is left desolate unto you".

Who is he? .."And "he" shall confirm the covenant with many for one week".

"He" is a pronoun, it needs a antecedent, it needs a noun to refer to. It's got to go all the way back up to the prophecy and it modifies Messiah the prince. "Messiah the prince" is the "he" of verse 27.
And he Messiah Jesus shall confirm the covenant, what covenant? the covenant that Jeremiah mentioned, the Testament, Daniel was reading Jeremiah and in Jeremiah 31-34 quoted verbatim in Hebrew 8:31-13 is the new covenant, the New Testament in the Blood of Jesus. The Blood Covenant cannot fail and cannot be broken!

In the spring of AD31 a very real Jesus died on the cross in Jerusalem and when He did this it caused all offerings and all sacrifices to cease as He was the ultimate ones and for all Blood sacrifice. He is the fulfillment and there will be no more sacrifice.
The first seven chapters of Acts has the church in staying in Jerusalem as it's head quarters.

With the stoning of Stephen the 70th week was over and God turned to all the nations, chapter 8 of Acts, Philip goes to Samaria, preaches Christ, Holy Ghost falls on them. Acts 9 Paul calling, Acts 10, Cornelius house, Holy Spirit outpouring, and Acts 13 Paul says to turn to the gentiles. and the head quarters moved from Jerusalem to Antioch.
Satan wanted a theology and a system of belief that says it never happened because in that 3,5 years span, satan himself defeated at Calvary's cross, as he is so deluded that he is living in denial of his own demise.

The 70 weeks have been fulfilled in total and all six things that wouild happen has happened. Verse 24

"Seventy 'sevens' are decreed for your people and your holy city to finish transgression, to put an end to sin, to atone for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the Most Holy Place".

Who made an end to the transgression? JESUS.
Who put an end to sin? JESUS
Who atoned for wickedness? JESUS
Who brought in an everlasting peace? JESUS
Who seal up all vision and prophecy and the fulfillment of everything? JESUS
Who anointed the Most Holy Place? JESUS

Jesus said it is finished!!

To say that the last week hasn't happened yet is to take away a part of His work on the cross as the 70 weeks were set to fulfill all the six things mentioned in Daniel 9:24 and is taking away from Christ sacrifice....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
"I'm sorry --- I did not mean for this to be misleading..." :eek:

I believe that the 'temple' that Revelation 11:1 is referring to is the second temple, which was destroyed in 70 A.D.

I do not believe that there will be a third temple built. Yes - I believe that the Jews want to build it -- that I will not dispute. However, I do not believe that God will let them build it before the return of Christ.

:)
I realized that from one of your earlier posts, that you see John having been given Revelation in the era when the 2nd temple was still standing, prior to its 70 A.D. destruction by the Romans. I don't agree with that.

We have a historical example of the "abomination of desolation" prophecy of Dan.11 with Antiochus IV in 165 B.C., yet our Lord Jesus quoted about that Daniel prophecy in His Olivet Discourse some 200 years after Antiochus IV had been dead.

Antiochus Epiphanes went into the 2nd temple, sacrificed swine upon the alter, spread its broth, and then setup an idol in Zeus worship. So even at Jesus' first coming, they already had a pattern for the "abomination of desolation" event in the temple.

That "abomination of desolation" event requires a standing temple in Jerusalem. It also requires the re-establishing of old covenant worship with that temple in order to fulfill that Dan.9:27 & Dan.11 prophecy, for that is the only meaning for the "holy covenant" mentioned there in Daniel's time.

And that is exactly what the orthodox Jews have been planning since they began to trek back to Jerusalem and Israel became a nation again.

Their doing that in the near future is not dependent upon our Faith on Jesus Christ as The Messiah. They still reject Jesus of Nazareth as Messiah. God is going to send them a fake, and the fake they will worship in place of Messiah, thinking he will be Messiah. Thus in their own eyes, they don't see that they're doing anything wrong, but only following the OT prophecies of Messiah coming, and the prophecy of Zech.6 about the building of the temple by Messiah. To them, that temple will very much be the "temple of God".
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
Everything hangs on Daniel 9, the 70 weeks. let me explain.

Every prophecy teacher will always comes back to the foundational part of Daniel 9 so that's why it is so important to look at the foundation first...

Daniel 9:25 "Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One (Jesus), the ruler, comes, there will be seven 'sevens,' and sixty-two 'sevens. It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble. (reference to Nehemiah and the rebuilding of the wall)

There are 490 years, the 70 sevens. From the time of the commandment to go back and to rebuild and restore Jerusalem, that is recorded is the seventh chapter of the book of Ezra where the King of Persia send Ezra back to rebuild and restore Jerusalem. That year was the autum of 457BC. That's when Daniels prophecy begins. It ends 490 years later. When you go from BC into AD you go all the way over into the autum of AD34. 457BC to AD34 is the time period of un-interrupted chronological time. You must understand, this is so important. Daniel prophecy is 70 weeks, covers a times period of un interrupted chronological time, 457BC when Ezra went back (Ezra 7) all the way over to the stoning of Stephen in Acts 7.
Heard it all before, but it doesn't work out.

First period: 454 B.C. to 405 B.C. - the seven sevens - 49 years.

Second period: 405 B.C. to 29 A.D. - the threescore and two sevens, 434 years, 29 A.D. being the year of the cutting off of Messiah.

Third period: one seven, 7 years or "one week" of Dan.9:27. This period still has YET TO BE FULFILLED.

Dan 9:24
24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.
KJV

At the real end of the 70 weeks prophecy is the complete end of the Daniel prophecy for Jerusalem and its people for this present world. That means all Bible prophecy given through God's prophets for this present world is to be finished at that point.

Has it today? No, of course not, because of the most important prophecies in God's Word is about our Lord Jesus RETURN to inherit His Kingdom here on earth. The phrase "to anoint the most Holy" is about the anointing of the Ezekiel sanctuary after Jesus' 2nd coming.

Therefore, to believe that the whole of the 70 weeks (490 years) were already fulfilled in 36 A.D., is to say that ALL Bible prophecies for this present world have finished, and that our Lord Jesus' return happened then. It's easy to understand today that has not... happened yet.
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
"He" is a pronoun, it needs a antecedent, it needs a noun to refer to. It's got to go all the way back up to the prophecy and it modifies Messiah the prince. "Messiah the prince" is the "he" of verse 27. And he Messiah Jesus shall confirm the covenant, what covenant? the covenant that Jeremiah mentioned, the Testament, Daniel was reading Jeremiah and in Jeremiah 31-34 quoted verbatim in Hebrew 8:31-13 is the new covenant, the New Testament in the Blood of Jesus. The Blood Covenant cannot fail and cannot be broken!
Greetings Planitsoon,

With all due respect, the above is incorrect. In order to identify the "He" of Dan.9:27, you have to go back to Verse 26, which is "the ruler" of the people. There is a very good reason as to why Jesus cannot be the "He" of Dan.9:27, which is as follows:


* "He" makes a covenant for one 'seven'

* In the middle of the 'seven' he causes the sacrifice and offering to cease

* "He" sets up an abomination that causes desolation


Since there is only one person referred to in the verse, the "He" performs all of the above mentioned. The problem with that is that by making Jesus the "He" in the verse, then that would mean that Jesus would also have to be the Once setting up the abomination in the temple and there is now way that he could have done that or would do that. The word "Bdelugma" translated "abomination" is defined as the following:

bdélygma (from 948 /bdelýssō, derived from bdēō, "to reek with stench") – properly, what emits a foul odor and hence is disgustingly abhorrent (abominable, detestable); (figuratively) moral horror as a stench to God (like when people refuse to hear and obey His voice).

Based on the above, Jesus would be blaspheming God the Father and himself by setting up the abomination. The person who will be making the covenant and setting up the abomination will be that coming ruler, the antichrist. The abomination that will be set up, is synonymous with the image that will be made in honor of the beast by the inhabitants of the earth at the request of that second beast, the false prophet (Rev.13:14-16).

Who made an end to the transgression? JESUS.
Jesus has not put an end to transgression, he provided forgiveness for those who have faith. Transgressions and sins are still on-going.

Who brought in an everlasting peace? JESUS
Look around you and turn on the news! Jesus has not yet brought in everlasting peace.

Who sealed up all vision and prophecy and the fulfillment of everything? JESUS
Many prophesies are still to come. In fact, the seals, trumpets and bowl judgments must all be fulfilled and that last seven years of the seventy sevens must be completed and therefore, all prophecy has not been fulfilled.

Jesus said it is finished!!
Jesus said, "it is finished!" meaning that everything that he came to do was fulfilled and the price for sin had been paid.

To say that the last week hasn't happened yet is to take away a part of His work on the cross as the 70 weeks were set to fulfill all the six things mentioned in Daniel 9:24 and is taking away from Christ sacrifice....
Not at all! The prophecy was for Israel and her holy city and has nothing to do with Christ's work on the cross. That last seven is where the rest of the prophecy will be fulfilled for the nation Israel and her holy city. That coming last seven years will begin when that coming ruler, that eighth king makes his seven year covenant, which will also be the time when God will be pouring out his wrath on a Christ rejecting world via the seals, trumpets and bowl judgments. The last half of the seven years, i.e. the last 3 1/2 years which begins at the setting up of the abomination, is referred to regarding Israel as "the time Jacob's trouble described in Jer.30:7 and also as the great tribulation period involving the entire world. Regarding that time, Jesus said:

"For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now—and never to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened."

The time of distress will come about because of God's wrath upon Israel and the entire world via the seals, trumpets and bowl judgments and the reign of the antichrist/beast. That last seven years is yet to be fulfilled and is what is coming and contains an unprecedented time of wrath which will decimate the population of the earth and dismantle all human government in preparation for the Lord's millennial kingdom.
 
K

KennethC

Guest
"I'm sorry --- I did not mean for this to be misleading..." :eek:

I believe that the 'temple' that Revelation 11:1 is referring to is the second temple, which was destroyed in 70 A.D.

I do not believe that there will be a third temple built. Yes - I believe that the Jews want to build it -- that I will not dispute. However, I do not believe that God will let them build it before the return of Christ.

:)

That is not possible because Revelation 11:1 is during the 6th Trumpet, which takes place during the Tribulation.
 
G

GaryA

Guest
Everything hangs on Daniel 9, the 70 weeks. let me explain.

Every prophecy teacher will always comes back to the foundational part of Daniel 9 so that's why it is so important to look at the foundation first...

Daniel 9:25 "Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One (Jesus), the ruler, comes, there will be seven 'sevens,' and sixty-two 'sevens. It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble. (reference to Nehemiah and the rebuilding of the wall)

There are 490 years, the 70 sevens. From the time of the commandment to go back and to rebuild and restore Jerusalem, that is recorded is the seventh chapter of the book of Ezra where the King of Persia send Ezra back to rebuild and restore Jerusalem. That year was the autum of 457BC. That's when Daniels prophecy begins. It ends 490 years later. When you go from BC into AD you go all the way over into the autum of AD34. 457BC to AD34 is the time period of un-interrupted chronological time. You must understand, this is so important. Daniel prophecy is 70 weeks, covers a times period of un interrupted chronological time, 457BC when Ezra went back (Ezra 7) all the way over to the stoning of Stephen in Acts 7.

What you must understand is verse 26

"Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined.

It is pretty evident that that was when prince Titus came in and destroyed the city of Jerusalem, the Jewish wars 66AD until AD70.

One reason the enemy has muddled the waters is because if our Jewish friends all over the world would have understood this scripture they would have seen that the Messiah had to come before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. Scofield, Larken, Moody say there are two princes in this chapter but you will see there is only One.

From the time that Ezra went back in 457BC unto Jesus coming down into the Jordan river to be baptized by John was 483 years. That's how Daniel says it.

"Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks:"
That is 69 weeks of 483 years.

From Ezra going back until the public of the anouncement of Messiah the prince where the Father spoke from heaven, Matthew 3:17: " This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased".

Please get this...

From Ezra's day, down to the time when Jesus came to be baptised was 483 years, and the 69th week ended when He stepped in the water.
The 70th week began when He came out of the water and for the next 3,5 years the first half of the 70th week, was Jesus public ministry.
The last 3,5 years of the 70th week Jesus still moved through the apostles by the power of the Holy Spirit in Jerusalem among the Jews.

Jesus death, burrial, resurrection, assension and the consequent coming of the Holy Spirit to empower the church is what I call the very pivit of human history and nothing more important than that. And all this happened during Daniels 70th week! From AD27 to AD34. It was the public ministry of Jesus Christ and the first seven chapters of the book of Acts.

Now the most important verse of all.

Verse 27.
"And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate".

The end of verse 26, the war that came and the Jewish that came was prophesied by Jesus Himself at the end of Matthew 23, "Behold your house is left desolate unto you".

Who is he? .."And "he" shall confirm the covenant with many for one week".

"He" is a pronoun, it needs a antecedent, it needs a noun to refer to. It's got to go all the way back up to the prophecy and it modifies Messiah the prince. "Messiah the prince" is the "he" of verse 27.
And he Messiah Jesus shall confirm the covenant, what covenant? the covenant that Jeremiah mentioned, the Testament, Daniel was reading Jeremiah and in Jeremiah 31-34 quoted verbatim in Hebrew 8:31-13 is the new covenant, the New Testament in the Blood of Jesus. The Blood Covenant cannot fail and cannot be broken!

In the spring of AD31 a very real Jesus died on the cross in Jerusalem and when He did this it caused all offerings and all sacrifices to cease as He was the ultimate ones and for all Blood sacrifice. He is the fulfillment and there will be no more sacrifice.
The first seven chapters of Acts has the church in staying in Jerusalem as it's head quarters.

With the stoning of Stephen the 70th week was over and God turned to all the nations, chapter 8 of Acts, Philip goes to Samaria, preaches Christ, Holy Ghost falls on them. Acts 9 Paul calling, Acts 10, Cornelius house, Holy Spirit outpouring, and Acts 13 Paul says to turn to the gentiles. and the head quarters moved from Jerusalem to Antioch.
Satan wanted a theology and a system of belief that says it never happened because in that 3,5 years span, satan himself defeated at Calvary's cross, as he is so deluded that he is living in denial of his own demise.

The 70 weeks have been fulfilled in total and all six things that wouild happen has happened. Verse 24

"Seventy 'sevens' are decreed for your people and your holy city to finish transgression, to put an end to sin, to atone for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the Most Holy Place".

Who made an end to the transgression? JESUS.
Who put an end to sin? JESUS
Who atoned for wickedness? JESUS
Who brought in an everlasting peace? JESUS
Who seal up all vision and prophecy and the fulfillment of everything? JESUS
Who anointed the Most Holy Place? JESUS

Jesus said it is finished!!

To say that the last week hasn't happened yet is to take away a part of His work on the cross as the 70 weeks were set to fulfill all the six things mentioned in Daniel 9:24 and is taking away from Christ sacrifice....
I have been "preaching" this for a long time now...

Thanks for posting this. It is always encouraging to see another person on CC who understands it.

:)