-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
My analogy was in regards to Trump v Clinton, that you feel has crushed the life out of Christians. It had nothing to do with the email scenario. If you wonder why Christians would support a non-Christian candidate, I was suggesting that to many of us, it is like the Roman Governor scenario. Trump isn't the candidate that says he is going to feed us to the lions.
R
well my suggestions for 'now what?' are...
hold russia accountable for meddling in our elections...
recognize wikileaks as a politically motivated foreign actor with hostile intentions and treat it as such...
hold ecuador accountable for its refusal to hand julian assange over the face justice...
investigate paul manafort...
hold russia accountable for meddling in our elections...
recognize wikileaks as a politically motivated foreign actor with hostile intentions and treat it as such...
hold ecuador accountable for its refusal to hand julian assange over the face justice...
investigate paul manafort...
R
well my point about trump and american christianity -was- directly related to the email hack...only under the influence of trump could so many professing christians be cheering for criminal activity in the united states...the left has tried and failed to destroy american christianity for decades...but trump is the one who has finally succeeded by poisoning the american church from within...
So how do we hold Russia, Ecuador, and Wikileaks accountable, nuke the first two and shut down the internet? Don't get me wrong, as a child, I dreamed of the day I could fight the rat-faced Russians, but the iron curtain fell 25 years ago and the world just aint been fun anymore.
Maybe we can propose a declaration to the U.N. saying "Bad Russia, bad." Then Russia can veto it.
Maybe we can propose a declaration to the U.N. saying "Bad Russia, bad." Then Russia can veto it.
Tell me more about your principles. When did they become sensitized to less than perfect candidates? Was Nixon living in your ere of republican law and order? Was Reagan, when he gave amnesty to criminals illegally entering this country? When did that ere exist?
If it was 1980, and the USSR was caught trying to influence the election in favor of Mondale by releasing truthful information that Reagan had sent to someone, the result would have been Reagan winning 49 of 50 states, just as he did.
You seem to think the information being leaked was fabricated. Democrats are not even suggesting that. They are trying to divert people's attention away from the fact that the information leaked is actually statements confirming a corrupt democrat party. There is a huge difference between leaking information that could endanger the lives of intelligence agents and leaking personal emails that show party leaders were violating campaign protocol and favoring one candidate over the other, while saying publically they were not doing that, and suggesting you are being totally transparent. These emails should not have to have been leaked. They should have been available for all Americans to read as part of a transparent campaign. It should be the law that nothing like this can be hidden.
V
I am sincerely grateful for your input in these forums.
I am a WikiLeaks sympathizer, even knowing their actions are illegal. You encourage me to revisit my infatuation over WikiLeaks and look at it from a view point consistent with biblical teachings. I think even I know it is ethically wrong for them to do what they do, but I can't make myself be outraged by them targeting corrupted entities for some unknown reason.
My question to you: How do we expose people in high positions of power without doing anything illegally?
I am a WikiLeaks sympathizer, even knowing their actions are illegal. You encourage me to revisit my infatuation over WikiLeaks and look at it from a view point consistent with biblical teachings. I think even I know it is ethically wrong for them to do what they do, but I can't make myself be outraged by them targeting corrupted entities for some unknown reason.
My question to you: How do we expose people in high positions of power without doing anything illegally?
M
AN American citizen handing over classified information to a foreign organization is relevant to what Mr Mitspa was expressing. The point I'm trying to make, is that there's been several outcries regarding this matter over years now. It was an offspring of the Bush administration, not entirely, of course, but he served as a midwife