The Police Gun Issue

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,945
1,563
113
#42
Well yes exactly 1775 - ancient history.
So what constitutes "ancient"? If a law or practice is over 200yrs old, then it should be repealed?

Our society is a much kinder and gentler place... we're more "civilized" now? And, our government will NEVER try to take away our rights against our wishes, becoming a tyranny?

I believe that's what the citizens of Germany thought in 1936 or so. "Our government would NEVER do THAT..."

If we don't learn from our mistakes, societally, then the human race is doomed. Which, I suppose, it actually IS. :rolleyes:

Given a choice to be a sheep or a wolf, I'd pick wolf every time. (but I'd be a benevolent wolf) ;)
 
A

Amazing-Grace

Guest
#43
So what constitutes "ancient"? If a law or practice is over 200yrs old, then it should be repealed?

Our society is a much kinder and gentler place... we're more "civilized" now? And, our government will NEVER try to take away our rights against our wishes, becoming a tyranny?

I believe that's what the citizens of Germany thought in 1936 or so. "Our government would NEVER do THAT..."

If we don't learn from our mistakes, societally, then the human race is doomed. Which, I suppose, it actually IS. :rolleyes:

Given a choice to be a sheep or a wolf, I'd pick wolf every time. (but I'd be a benevolent wolf) ;)
Maybe your guns give you a false sense of security? If the government wanted to defeat the people there are always a few nuclear warheads for their consideration, I don't think a few handguns are going to stop a tyrannical government. Maybe they just make you feel safe.
 

Tommy379

Notorious Member
Jan 12, 2016
7,589
1,152
113
#44
Maybe your guns give you a false sense of security? If the government wanted to defeat the people there are always a few nuclear warheads for their consideration, I don't think a few handguns are going to stop a tyrannical government. Maybe they just make you feel safe.
Fortunately that was settled 233 years ago in Yorktown. The people won.
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,945
1,563
113
#45
Maybe your guns give you a false sense of security? If the government wanted to defeat the people there are always a few nuclear warheads for their consideration, I don't think a few handguns are going to stop a tyrannical government. Maybe they just make you feel safe.
It's amazing what an armed populace can accomplish.

There was a group of Jews in one of the ghettos that held off the German army for several weeks, with only one or two rifles. If they had been properly armed, the Germans likely would have been stopped.

Nuclear warheads? Do you think the US govt would nuke their own country? Seriously?

The British army, arguably the most powerful army in the world at that time, couldn't defeat the armed "yanks".....

It's not always about the biggest and best weapons. It's about the will to fight and die for a cause..

And... the citizens here have quite a bit more than a "few handguns"...:rolleyes:
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,057
3,365
113
#46
Even my own preacher preaches from the pulpit that people, Black or White, should not have to comply with the police (one of several reasons my future in that congregation is uncertain) While I, on the other hand, say that COMPLIANCE is paramount.

I've got to ask, what does your pastor do with 1st Peter 2:13-17


[SUP]13 [/SUP]Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, [SUP]14 [/SUP]or to governors as sent [SUP][p][/SUP]by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right. [SUP]15 [/SUP]For [SUP][q][/SUP]such is the will of God that by doing right you may silence the ignorance of foolish men. [SUP]16 [/SUP]Act as free men, and [SUP][r][/SUP]do not use your freedom as a covering for evil, but use it as bondslaves of God. [SUP]17 [/SUP]Honor all people, love the brotherhood, fear God, honor the [SUP][s][/SUP]king.

or Romans 13:1-7

Every [SUP][a][/SUP]person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except [SUP][b][/SUP]from God, and those which exist are established by God. [SUP]2 [/SUP]Therefore [SUP][c][/SUP]whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. [SUP]3 [/SUP]For rulers are not a cause of fear for [SUP][d][/SUP]good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good and you will have praise from the same; [SUP]4 [/SUP]for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil. [SUP]5 [/SUP]Therefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience’ sake. [SUP]6 [/SUP]For because of this you also pay taxes, for rulers are servants of God, devoting themselves to this very thing. [SUP]7 [/SUP]Render to all what is due them: tax to whom tax is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor.

or numerous other verses that instruct us to obey the civil authorities?

The first time I heard that out of a pastor's mouth I would get up, walk out, and never return. IMO if a pastor is going to instruct his congregation to go against anything that the Bible is that clear on, how can I trust him to correctly teach me on subjects that might be less clear?
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#47

I've got to ask, what does your pastor do with 1st Peter 2:13-17


[SUP]13 [/SUP]Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, [SUP]14 [/SUP]or to governors as sent [SUP][p][/SUP]by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right. [SUP]15 [/SUP]For [SUP][q][/SUP]such is the will of God that by doing right you may silence the ignorance of foolish men. [SUP]16 [/SUP]Act as free men, and [SUP][r][/SUP]do not use your freedom as a covering for evil, but use it as bondslaves of God. [SUP]17 [/SUP]Honor all people, love the brotherhood, fear God, honor the [SUP][s][/SUP]king.

or Romans 13:1-7

Every [SUP][a][/SUP]person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except [SUP][b][/SUP]from God, and those which exist are established by God. [SUP]2 [/SUP]Therefore [SUP][c][/SUP]whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. [SUP]3 [/SUP]For rulers are not a cause of fear for [SUP][d][/SUP]good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good and you will have praise from the same; [SUP]4 [/SUP]for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil. [SUP]5 [/SUP]Therefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience’ sake. [SUP]6 [/SUP]For because of this you also pay taxes, for rulers are servants of God, devoting themselves to this very thing. [SUP]7 [/SUP]Render to all what is due them: tax to whom tax is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor.

or numerous other verses that instruct us to obey the civil authorities?

The first time I heard that out of a pastor's mouth I would get up, walk out, and never return. IMO if a pastor is going to instruct his congregation to go against anything that the Bible is that clear on, how can I trust him to correctly teach me on subjects that might be less clear?
As I said, it one of several issues in the past six months that are making it very difficult for my wife and me to stay there. But, surprisingly, out of 600 other churches we have to choose from in this area, where we are, is still the best we have found so far.
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,057
3,365
113
#48
As I said, it one of several issues in the past six months that are making it very difficult for my wife and me to stay there. But, surprisingly, out of 600 other churches we have to choose from in this area, where we are, is still the best we have found so far.
I find it difficult (not impossible) to believe that in a major metropolitan area like yours that there aren't at least a couple of good churches. Of course depending on your particular doctrinal stances (and how tightly you hold them) it can become more difficult.

Personally I've been fond of Calvary Chapel and currently attend a CMA church. The CMA hangs their hats on the essentials but is relatively loose on secondary doctrines in which case each congregation can have a very different feel
 
P

Persuaded

Guest
#49
I find it difficult (not impossible) to believe that in a major metropolitan area like yours that there aren't at least a couple of good churches. Of course depending on your particular doctrinal stances (and how tightly you hold them) it can become more difficult.

Personally I've been fond of Calvary Chapel and currently attend a CMA church. The CMA hangs their hats on the essentials but is relatively loose on secondary doctrines in which case each congregation can have a very different feel
How can a person decide that some doctrine is essential and others are secondary.
I just don't understand how one could take it upon themselves to make such a judgment.
 
A

Amazing-Grace

Guest
#50
It's amazing what an armed populace can accomplish.

There was a group of Jews in one of the ghettos that held off the German army for several weeks, with only one or two rifles. If they had been properly armed, the Germans likely would have been stopped.

Nuclear warheads? Do you think the US govt would nuke their own country? Seriously?

The British army, arguably the most powerful army in the world at that time, couldn't defeat the armed "yanks".....

It's not always about the biggest and best weapons. It's about the will to fight and die for a cause..

And... the citizens here have quite a bit more than a "few handguns"...:rolleyes:
I used "Nuclear warheads" as an example that the government could out-arm a population of gun owners - that was my point.

Tommy keeps referring back hundreds of years as an argument...as if this is relevant today.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
58,814
28,218
113
#51
The British army, arguably the most powerful army in the world at that time, couldn't defeat the armed "yanks".....
We helped 'em burn the white house :D

On August 24, 1814, after defeating the Americans at the Battle of Bladensburg, a British force led by Major General Robert Ross occupied Washington, D.C., and set fire to many public buildings, including the White House (known as the Presidential Mansion at the time), and the Capitol, as well as other facilities of the U.S. government.

The attack was in part a retaliation for the recent American destruction of Port Dover in Upper Canada. It marks the only time in U.S. history that Washington, D.C., has been occupied by a foreign force.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burning_of_Washington
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,500
1,078
113
#52
The guy in New when was a violent felon on a grocery store parking with a gun....
another dindu nuffin
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,945
1,563
113
#54
I used "Nuclear warheads" as an example that the government could out-arm a population of gun owners - that was my point.

Tommy keeps referring back hundreds of years as an argument...as if this is relevant today.
Yes, you are correct about the gov't having more weapons... but I think Tommy is talking about the result of an armed populace, who is fighting for their "homeland"... how that can tip the scales in the favor of the "underdog". I has, many times. Of course it is not always successful... which leads to sayings like "I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees" ....

Of course, in reality, at THIS point in our history, we ARE a "kinder, gentler" society in many ways.

Scenario: We disarm the nation... like, say... Australia or GB... with Muslims flooding over here at the rate they are, if they decide to vote in Sharia law? We either bow to Islam, or we die. Perhaps an extreme example, but... all such examples are considered extreme... until they happen.

I would rather have a choice in how I live my life..
 
C

Church2u2

Guest
#55
You did see an officer take a gun from the bad guy's hand. Remember the officers were called there because the suspect had just pointed the gun at another person.
Oh that's also what I'm hearing now but when I first saw the video of that New Orleans shooting I didn't see a gun in the suspects hand. Maybe because I was so focused on the way his arm was jerking after he was shot.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,500
1,078
113
#56
It wasn't in his hand. You can see an officer pull the pistol out of his pocket... I'm not entirely convinced that they had to shoot him but these situations can be avoided but not being a violent felon on a grocery store parking lot with a gun
 
C

Church2u2

Guest
#57
Really? Why is it the Police Officers fault for protecting themselves along with other citizens? You can't sit and nitpick what they do if you haven't been in their shoes. Police Officers aren't without nerves, they aren't without fear. And from the training the LEO's get in my area, you don't just shoot once and hope your aim was good enough to stop the suspect. The issue is, this guy didn't obey orders to put down his gun and the end result was he got shot and died.

I think it is shameful people like you come on here and criticize the men and women who are defending citizens everyday. I just read a report of three men shooting a group of people including a 3 year old girl. Where is the outcry for the 3 year old? Why did these three men have to shoot so many times? The hypocrisy is astounding when it comes to LEO's.

I think more people need to actually put themselves in the officer's shoes and really think before they make comments. People are rioting because they have nothing better to do. They want to spread hate and anger and people just thrive on these types of emotions.
You're right. People do thrive on these emotions. Yes police officers do have a right to protect and serve. That is their function. To protect and serve. America would be hell without our cops.But some officers react out of fear,anger or just to intimidate because they have a license to kill. They are in a high pressure job and dealing with volatile, violent and sometimes mentally unstable people.Then there are the"bad" cops who hurt innocent people or intimidate prostitutes into performing sexual favors for them.Or steal money from dope busts and e.t.c.We need to pray for the men and women in law enforcement. Some of them are as corrupt as any crooked politician.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#58
How can a person decide that some doctrine is essential and others are secondary.
I just don't understand how one could take it upon themselves to make such a judgment.
Every single one of us has and does. These are 99.9% manmade "doctrines" that attract us to certain denominations, depending upon our personalities and experiences.
 
C

Church2u2

Guest
#59
It wasn't in his hand. You can see an officer pull the pistol out of his pocket... I'm not entirely convinced that they had to shoot him but these situations can be avoided but not being a violent felon on a grocery store parking lot with a gun
Right.But also even a violent felon has a right to be on a grocery store parking lot. And we never know what kind of heat people are packing.I guess the cops don't either.Which is probably why they shoot first and ask questions later sometimes.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#60
I find it difficult (not impossible) to believe that in a major metropolitan area like yours that there aren't at least a couple of good churches. Of course depending on your particular doctrinal stances (and how tightly you hold them) it can become more difficult.

Personally I've been fond of Calvary Chapel and currently attend a CMA church. The CMA hangs their hats on the essentials but is relatively loose on secondary doctrines in which case each congregation can have a very different feel
I didn't mean to say they weren't out there, somewhere. I just meant that it takes years to sort through 600 churches.

We went to Calvary Chapel for some time, and found it far too big and impersonal, not oriented toward the gifts (unless we could accept them being "attended to" only in back rooms after the service), not at all spontaneous, and the one here is hugely commercial and money driven. It's a small "Mega" church.... about 2,000 to 3,000 people.