I have to give Trump a few kudos. He barely regressed into his spoiled brat personality and interrupted Hillary and the mods at all, compared to the first debate. Of course, a presidential candidate should never appear like a madman out of control.
He also seemed to have much better control of his bizarre faces he made in the first debate.
I would imagine his handlers were drilling him daily on how to look like someone who is almost normal.
Sadly, they could not give him the ability to articulate clearly and succinctly what he was trying to communicate. I think there is no one in the world that could do that for Trump, at this late time in his life.
As for Hillary, I do not agree with much of her platform. But at least she sounds like she has the capacity to be the leader of the free world. Too bad some people are grasping at straws and perpetuating misinformation, particularly in the rape case where she defended the guy who raped the 12 year old girl, which she tried not to do, but had no choice in the matter. Well, at least she learned that polygraphs are a scam, when her client passed one! Oh, right, one of the times she laughed! She laughed at the farce of polygraphs, not of the rape victim. The other occasions of laughing were not to do with the rape victim either. Did any of you listen to that tape? I thought not!
i keep hearing about how Hillary threatened all these women friends of Bill's. Yet, no one seems able to post anything that shows she actually did. As far as the women who turned up to support Trump at the debate, that Hillary supposedly threatened, how much do you think Trump had to pay them to do that stunt? Because, let's face it - he has the money to bribe a lot of things.
Now, in the end, Hillary may turn out to be a greater scoundrel than Trump. But Hillary can never be the buffoon that Trump has been throughout this election campaign. Maybe some people are just so used to watching Reality TV that they never figured out that those shows, like Trump's campaign are all scripted for the purpose of making people believe he is "authentic" and not part of the "party establishment?"
