The ever-changing ESV Bible

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
"Takes out"... according to what standard? The KJV? That's circular reasoning. If you're trying to prove the KJV as accurate, you may not use the KJV as the standard against which others are compared. If all you are doing is saying that, in reference to the KJV, the ESV does not have all these words, your assertions have no value, because the root of the issue is the accuracy of Scripture (in my usage, "Scripture" does not equal the KJV exclusively).

If AND ONLY IF you are comparing both the KJV and the ESV with an objective standard can these charges of "taking out" possibly be valid. There is an objective standard: the manuscript evidence as a whole. Your argument fails... again.
True, they think that they are showing the superiority of KJV by comparison KJV to other translations. Which is nonsense.

They must prove that the KJV reading is the right one, not that it has more verses or different words.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
To:
John146
fredoheaven



Why do YOU need to have something more than apostles and church had till 1500? What special revelation was added during that time? Or what is so special about you, that you must have every word in OT perfect?

Can you prove your:
a) theory of (only) one perfect translation
b) theory that it is the KJV (and by prove I mean prove that KJV is right, not to show that KJV is different)
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,945
3,622
113
2 Samuel 21:19

KJV - And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaareoregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver's beam.

ESV - And there was again war with the Philistines at Gob, and Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim, the Bethlehemite, struck down Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.

Wow! I thought David killed Goliath. There is truth to be had in 2 Samuel 21:19. One is correct and the other is false. Which ever one is false would nullify that version from being the word of truth.
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,945
1,563
113
2 Samuel 21:19

KJV - And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaareoregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver's beam.

ESV - And there was again war with the Philistines at Gob, and Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim, the Bethlehemite, struck down Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.

Wow! I thought David killed Goliath. There is truth to be had in 2 Samuel 21:19. One is correct and the other is false. Which ever one is false would nullify that version from being the word of truth.
Wow! I don't know! Perhaps there were two guys named Goliath? There apparently were quite a few of these giant guys running around over at Gath/Gob, wherever..

Is this a salvation issue?

You are the guy that says that the KJV is no problem to read and understand... that if there is an issue of not understanding the old English prose, the reader should go and STUDY it to understand it.

Same thing here... if I find a discrepancy in a translation, I will STUDY it, and go back to the original Greek if necessary, to understand it..... IF it is a salvation issue.

There have been other discrepancies like that pointed out to you and the other KJV only folks, that you simply brush aside as being typos, or not important...

Find something that is essential to salvation that has been mis-translated, and we'll talk...
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,945
1,563
113
and, by the way, this is not the only translation that has written it that way. Apparently there was some confusion in the original texts, and many of the translations probably translated it word for word? I don't know. But I do know that the translations that don't say it was the brother of Goliath, DO put it in footnotes.

It is not a simple "mis-quote" as you like to propose.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,945
3,622
113
Wow! I don't know! Perhaps there were two guys named Goliath? There apparently were quite a few of these giant guys running around over at Gath/Gob, wherever..

Is this a salvation issue?

You are the guy that says that the KJV is no problem to read and understand... that if there is an issue of not understanding the old English prose, the reader should go and STUDY it to understand it.

Same thing here... if I find a discrepancy in a translation, I will STUDY it, and go back to the original Greek if necessary, to understand it..... IF it is a salvation issue.

There have been other discrepancies like that pointed out to you and the other KJV only folks, that you simply brush aside as being typos, or not important...

Find something that is essential to salvation that has been mis-translated, and we'll talk...
Nope, only one of them was named Goliath. The other giants had names too.

No, it's not a salvation issue. It's a truth issue. It's a trust issue. What it does is nullify the belief that the ESV is the word of truth.

John 17:17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.

If it's not all true, then it is not the word of truth.
 
E

eph610

Guest
Nope, only one of them was named Goliath. The other giants had names too.

No, it's not a salvation issue. It's a truth issue. It's a trust issue. What it does is nullify the belief that the ESV is the word of truth.

John 17:17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.

If it's not all true, then it is not the word of truth.
there you go again making it a salivation issue...are you this blind or do they teach you to be this foolish in defending the KJO way of life 101
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,945
3,622
113
there you go again making it a salivation issue...are you this blind or do they teach you to be this foolish in defending the KJO way of life 101
Read again my friend, I said it's not a salvation issue.
 
E

eph610

Guest
Read again my friend, I said it's not a salvation issue.
when you state its a truth issue, you are sayings its a salvation issue, by stating the KJV is better truth, it becomes a salvation issue...because....the KJV then becomes the only truthful text there is
I know and hope you are smart enough to see this...if not...its on you
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,945
3,622
113
when you state its a truth issue, you are sayings its a salvation issue, by stating the KJV is better truth, it becomes a salvation issue...because....the KJV then becomes the only truthful text there is
I know and hope you are smart enough to see this...if not...its on you
Do you have a Bible that contains the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Does your Bible contain any errors? If so, it's not the word of truth.
 
E

eph610

Guest
Do you have a Bible that contains the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Does your Bible contain any errors? If so, it's not the word of truth.
and neither is the KJV because it contains errors...
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,945
1,563
113
and neither is the KJV because it contains errors...
Correct.... and we've been down that road with him several times in the past...

He just refuses to believe/answer/consider all the proofs that have been shown. It would destroy the underpinnings of his belief to admit any error in the KJV..
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,945
3,622
113
Correct.... and we've been down that road with him several times in the past...

He just refuses to believe/answer/consider all the proofs that have been shown. It would destroy the underpinnings of his belief to admit any error in the KJV..
All the proofs you suggest are just opinions. When you have a Bible to offer that is 100% truth, then at least we can have a conversation about that. Can you offer a Bible that is without error or at least that you claim is without error?
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,945
3,622
113
Do ya'll have anything you can give to the world and claim, "Here you go, you can trust everything you read in this book. It's God's word"?
 
W

wwjd_kilden

Guest
Well, it is clear he won't listen to logic. so just let him live in his version of the world.
I guess he thinks only native English readers are saved by the way, as those of us using it as a second langauge don't have "KJ" versions of our bibles, for the obvious reason that we didn't have a king named James (at least not a bible- "writing" one)

If a man says that the sky (currently blue) is black, and keeps insisting on it, you are merely wasting your time arguing, he will keep on his delusion even with proof right in front of his eyes
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,945
3,622
113
Well, it is clear he won't listen to logic. so just let him live in his version of the world.
I guess he thinks only native English readers are saved by the way, as those of us using it as a second langauge don't have "KJ" versions of our bibles, for the obvious reason that we didn't have a king named James (at least not a bible- "writing" one)

If a man says that the sky (currently blue) is black, and keeps insisting on it, you are merely wasting your time arguing, he will keep on his delusion even with proof right in front of his eyes
wwjd, do you have a Bible you can offer the world that is perfect, without error?
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,945
1,563
113
wwjd, do you have a Bible you can offer the world that is perfect, without error?
No more than YOU do.

It's been proven.

You simply refuse to accept it.

That's called fanaticism.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
All the proofs you suggest are just opinions. When you have a Bible to offer that is 100% truth, then at least we can have a conversation about that. Can you offer a Bible that is without error or at least that you claim is without error?
What exactly is "only opinion" about this:

"Then sent Joseph, and called his father Jacob to him, and all his kindred, threescore and fifteen (75) souls."
(KJV Acts 7:14)

"...all the souls of the house of Jacob, which came into Egypt, were threescore and ​ten (70)"
(KJV Genesis 46:27)

If you are suggesting such errors about ESV, why dont you see it in your KJV?
 
E

eph610

Guest
All the proofs you suggest are just opinions. When you have a Bible to offer that is 100% truth, then at least we can have a conversation about that. Can you offer a Bible that is without error or at least that you claim is without error?
and all the proofs you offer against other versions are also just..................opinions.

Why not mosey down to Lowes, go to the ladder department,......buy one....walk outside......set up......and.....

GET OVER IT......