@Wanderer:
Sorry I have been away - lot's of things going on at home, like Christmas preparations, so not a lot of time to be on-line.
First - this is MY thread. Yours was closed! Remember?
Therefore it is incumbent upon you to refute my OP. You say you posted a bunch of random Scriptures, unrelated to the OP. When you can actually answer, using English, Greek, Hebrew or Urdu, for all I care, and show how healing is in the atonement, then I will move on and discuss your out of context verses. So when you have tried to refute my verses, of course, not being able to, as 42 pages have shown, then we can discuss your verses.
Second - the reason I am so adamant about discussing Isa. 53, is because for one thing, it is only one verse, and an entire doctrine has been based (wrongly) on this verse. Kick the stuffing out of the WoF usage of Isa. 53, and you really have NOTHING left.
And that is why it is hermeneutically wrong to make a doctrine out of one verses. And why I keep harping on it.
So any other verses you think support this heineous heresy that healing is in the atonement are going to be classed as wrongly interpreted, because the foundational verse "By his stripes we are healed," Isa. 53, in a prophecy about the Messiah, his suffering and that he came to save us from our sins, iniquity, unrighteousness, etc. Somehow gets twisted to mean not "the sickness of sin" - that he heals us from our sins and its consequences, but is ripped out of the verse itself, the passage, the chapter and the book, and a meaning which Isaiah never intended, and certainy the Jews in the Septuagint knew meant "he heals us from our sin-sick lives - he SAVES us, he DELIVERS us, he RESCUES us FROM OUR SIN!!
This is not to denigrate Christ's healing ministry on earth, nor to say that God never heals - quite the contrary! But it is to say, that healing is NOT part of the atonement, and healing comes out of the mercy and love of God.
Third, I would ask you, in what way am I a hypocrite.You have called me that in a number of posts. Am I am hypocrite because I put you in your place theologically, using Scripture? Am I a hypocrite, because you said somewhere back on page 2 that you were going to fully refute my OP, and I am still waiting for you to go through the verses I posted, and show mE exegetically where I am wrong? Am I a hypocrite because when your thread was closed, you tried to take over this thread, and have shown that I am only interesting in discussion, rightfully so, the key verses in the OP?
Or am I a hypocrite, because in the "Tongues" thread, you pretended to post in Greek, and I called you on it? Or am I a hypocrite because you say you know Greek, because in "every course" you take, there is one or two Greek words, making you an expert? Until you have had a Master's level introductory Greek course, at the least, or equivalent, (some people I know have learned on their own and have learned very well out of class - OldHermit and Marc who doesn't come around any more are two that I can have an excellent discussion concerning the Greek), do not come onto my thread, posting Strong's definitions, and not explaining why and how they apply specifically. Posting Pisteuo (I have faith) in the Greek means nothing unless it uncovers details that are not already known in English. And face it, to be a Christian everyone has to say "I have faith," so don't pretend to redefine the absolutely satisfactory word "faith" in English, using Greek and giving it a different meaning. Because Greek doesn't support that.
Finally, as a young man, you should be showing respect to your elders. It is appalling that you are so arrogant, you think you can somehow come into this forum, and teach us all that you have uncovered things that no one else has ever seen before. As I said my background in the early 1980's BEFORE YOU WERE BORN! with reading all the books of Kenyon, Hagin, Copeland, and in my new Christian innocence, asking God to show me the truth, and God conclusively saying this doctrine was evil, and then watching my friend, an ordained Kenneth Copeland pastor die of breast cancer, because she had claimed healing based on Isa. 53, was the nail in the coffin for this heresy, and the reason why I will continue to fight it exegetically till it is only remembered as another selfish, man centered doctrine in the trash heap of heresies.