Sorry p4t
If I write "holy, other" this is what I meant. I did not mean wholly other. My brain does that
which is not very consistent, but I am happy with my approximations.
If I write "holy, other" this is what I meant. I did not mean wholly other. My brain does that
which is not very consistent, but I am happy with my approximations.
You also don't know what the word 'exalt' means. This is apparent because you think that others that teach God couldn't become man (gnostics) are exalting Him too much. That would be the exact opposite of what 'exalt' means. So, you don't even know the definition of the word. Assuredly henceforth you can provide a definition and pretend you knew it all along, when evidence proves otherwise.
I feel you are just being obtuse.
I build a model in my mind and reference it.
Now either you address the points or you try and make you own. For me you have done neither, so I find it all irrelevant. I wonder how you normally engage with people? Probably this badly. Certainly no brother of mine.
You're way off track son, in utter heresy. Any person who starts off teaching Christ didn't do enough is in fact on a dangerous, heretical and unsustainable path. That, and proves cannot learn even one thing, or admit error.
Last edited: