Sorry p4t
If I write "holy, other" this is what I meant. I did not mean wholly other. My brain does that
which is not very consistent, but I am happy with my approximations.
No, you made a theological statement thinking the theological statement says 'holy other' when it is actually 'wholly other'. But, you don't care to listen. Please don't pretend you coined this term. Thanks.
You also don't know what the word 'exalt' means. This is apparent because you think that others that teach God couldn't become man (gnostics) are exalting Him too much. That would be the exact opposite of what 'exalt' means. So, you don't even know the definition of the word. Assuredly henceforth you can provide a definition and pretend you knew it all along, when evidence proves otherwise.
I feel you are just being obtuse.
I've shown you to be the one who is obtuse. Look up above.
I build a model in my mind and reference it.
We've found the problem!!!!!!!!!!
Now either you address the points or you try and make you own. For me you have done neither, so I find it all irrelevant. I wonder how you normally engage with people? Probably this badly. Certainly no brother of mine.
I've nailed every false teaching you've brought forward thus far, yet apparently you can't learn, see, hear. This isn't the only time you've claimed others as lost. Sad indeed.
You're way off track son, in utter heresy. Any person who starts off teaching Christ didn't do enough is in fact on a dangerous, heretical and unsustainable path. That, and proves cannot learn even one thing, or admit error.
Last edited:
