Don't feel bad I think we all had to suffer through that..lol
I am still in my flesh, I Still sin, I still suffer ill health, I will (unless God comes first) die. I still have to watch people suffer. I still am not perfect.
But those things will happen one day, It is not a question of if they may or may not happen. How do we know? Because we are saved.
Maybe complete is not the right word. Maybe we need another term? Maybe we could say my salvation will be realized? But I am just s saved today, as I was the moment I first was adopted as a child of God.
im going to keep my replies as short as i can this time . i may or may not address everything you say but will try to address the most important parts.
changing the word to realized doesnt fix it either . its still basically the same thing . at least in my opinion . just saying
I can maybe see that, But I am my fathers son the day I was born, I am my fathers son, and I will always be my fathers son. So it not unheard of to use those terms..
i understand that its not unheard of to use those terms . its what needs to be done if it is truly osas . the question is whether that is the accurate and scriptural definition or use for it . it lies at the heart of this debate .
It is a state. that never changes, to me that is how I see it.. I was saved when I was young, I am saved today, And I will be saved when I am ressurected. or the day of atonemnt as paul calls it.
what happens if you got saved , were walking the walk in the lord , were really on fire for the lord but then decide for some reason that you dont believe in the lord anymore and dont want to follow him anymore ,essentially renouncing your faith? are you still going to be saved when the time comes when your salvation would have been(to use your terms) realized or completed?
If you do not call out and ask God to save you, Can you tell me how you would be saved? Think of the pharisee and tax collector. The pharisee praised God he was who he was, The tax collector called out to God. who did Jesus say was saved?
Again, the so called "sinners prayer" by itself will save no one.. Many claim to have faith, but have no faith at all.. so whether they said a sinners prayer or not would not matter..
i answered the how in another reply to someone else . in an effort to keep things somewhat short i would refer you to that. as im aware that you do not believe that the sinners prayer in itself will "save" anyone . im in no way saying that those who came to christ wont be "saved" if they did the sinners prayer . im just questioning the scriptural truth of that teaching is all. also , if that teaching isnt true , the how of coming to the faith is very important in understanding whether osas is a true doctrine.
Not sure how using passages which speak of people already saved helps.. You will have to help me there because I am not sure what your getting at.
the point is , what does it mean is calling on the lord mean in these verses ? it cant mean the same thing that youre suggesting it means as far as proving the sinners prayer doctrine . these are christians already , why are they continuing to call on the lord using your definition since they should have already done it and its a once and done deal ?
wouldnt it be logical , at least in these verses , that calling on the lord simply means to call to him in prayer ? to call on him because you depend on him ? if so , how do you know that the verses you use to prove sinners prayer doesnt have the same meaning as what i suggest instead of what you suggest ? cant the phrase if you call on the name of the lord you will be saved also mean that those who continue to call on the name of the lord in prayer because they depend and trust in him will be saved? basically , cant that mean that its an action of existing faith instead of an action of someone coming to the faith in the verses you use?
The tax collector is a great example..
and again I will ask, Why do you think people can be saved who do not ask God to save them? I do noot understand how do you think they were saved?
as i said earlier here , look at a reply to another post i made for the answer .
So God saved people before they had faith and asked him to have mercy on their souls?(your making a calvanist argument) or because they had faith?
You ever talk to god without uttering a word? I do it all the time..
that is not at all what im saying . again , read the reply to another post i made about how ppl come to the faith .
also , every denomination or belief system will have something in common with calvanist doctrine . does that mean if someone from those denominations subscribe completely to calvanism ? so in otherwords , if you use any doctrine that is the same as a calvanist doctrine , then someone could try to say that against you as well . just something to ponder .
It does not say they never asked God to pray either does it?
im sorry , im not trying to be smart or rude with this comment but ..
isnt that like saying , "its not in scripture so it must be true" ?
No everyone prayes out loud..
Why would he need to?
i understand not everyone prays outloud , i myself dont unless leading prayer in a group or with someone else .
Repent means to repent, You repent BEFORE you have faith, once you trust. you say yes to God.. That is what romans 10 is all abouot. it does not have to be out load.
basically i dont completely agree with the ordering (although i admit at times it does go in that order but not always) but i do agree that repentance does not need to be outloud. i will not get into why at this time but it is partly explained in the ordering of how we come to the faith reply i made on the other post about how we come to the faith . this will come up again though .
Yes, He asked God, And Jesus said yes.. SO not sure what tryign to get at. I guess I am confused on this one..lol
i think i answered this as well in that other post ive been talking about . i cant remember for sure whether i deleted that part or not now .. lol
im good at confusing people , especially those who havent heard my arguments before . i sincerely do not intentionally try to confuse ppl , it just happens , i guess its a gift ? lol
if it depends on you, then salvation is by works, not grace.
no it does not , it depends on faith in that grace .
Eternal security is found in scripture. The seal of the spirit is a seal of security, Eternal life is a pledge of security, the idea that you will never die is a term of security, the idea that you will be risen (vs being delivered) is security.
eternal promise is found in scripture , out eternal security within that promise is what we are debating . as far as the seal of the spirit , that is a deposit towards salvation , as i said in that post i keep referring back to , that needs to be discussed later . we have the promise of eternal life , we do not currently have eternal life do we ? the promise is secure , doesnt mean that there isnt something we can do to not be apart of that promise anymore .
if you are saved , which to you means we are eternally secure meaning we cant lose our salvation , does that mean we could take the mark of the beast and still be saved ?
If I have no security, I have no hope only in myself. for I am then required to maintain whatever standard, or do what ever is required to save myself. salvation then to me stops being a gift, but becomes a downpayment which can be taken away.
if you have security there is no need for hope to begin with . the hope we have is that the lord is able and willing to fulfill his promises to us . to live a life pleasing to the lord in no way makes it stop being a gift . maybe you think i believe in works based salvation , which i dont . faith is what saves us but faith without works is dead . can that faith save you ? james 2 says it cant .
I hope this makes sense to you.. It is how I see it.
i think it did , but that doesnt mean i didnt misunderstand something somewhere though . lol
Thank you, Not everyone here is that way,, on both sides of the discussion sadly,
I look forweard to blessed conversation and discussion.