That is exactly what the blindfold of accepting a false doctrine does sister. the gog teaches blaitantly that only Jesus words that are conditionless such as " the owrk of God is this, to believe in the One He has sent" <<those things are for christians, but when Jesus in whom that verse is saying believe in Him, says " do this orthis or that" which you understand like myself and others He is all about directing and teaching us, then the gog teaches thats "the law of moses and you died to it" , only whats after the cross is for you even in light of the great commission matt 28:18-20, clearly says go into all the world and teach them to obey whatsoever i have commended you <<<this statement is made after the "cross" but still its not acceptable if there smething meant to do.
to really understand the other side of this, you have to see the teaching they are coming from from such as paul ellis and joseph prince, among many others today. its gone further than calvin even did. much further than billy graham. its outright denial of the gospel. Have you noticed its " the gospel of the grace of christ" <<it even removes Jesus name from its title. based on the way paul spoke, which we are warned of by Peter. There is proper order the 4 gospels as you know already have to be the foundation in order to understand what the apostles are even saying. Paul Just was educated different so His words are different, but His teachings are the same.
its just blindness because the Light is found in the true Gospel. His word is the light so the gog preachers have to sell the "real truth" for 19.95 and Jesus doesnt win popularity contests when you know His word, so they omit those things people dont like to Hear such as " you cannot serve both God and money" so the book labels it Law. someone who holds grudges doesnt want to Hear " if you forgive men when they sin against you, your father will forgive you, but if you dont, he wont" so, they call it law even thought none of these teachings are in the Law of moses, they make is seem like the gospel changed and its all about exalting the word grace.
to really understand the other side of this, you have to see the teaching they are coming from from such as paul ellis and joseph prince, among many others today. its gone further than calvin even did. much further than billy graham. its outright denial of the gospel. Have you noticed its " the gospel of the grace of christ" <<it even removes Jesus name from its title. based on the way paul spoke, which we are warned of by Peter. There is proper order the 4 gospels as you know already have to be the foundation in order to understand what the apostles are even saying. Paul Just was educated different so His words are different, but His teachings are the same.
its just blindness because the Light is found in the true Gospel. His word is the light so the gog preachers have to sell the "real truth" for 19.95 and Jesus doesnt win popularity contests when you know His word, so they omit those things people dont like to Hear such as " you cannot serve both God and money" so the book labels it Law. someone who holds grudges doesnt want to Hear " if you forgive men when they sin against you, your father will forgive you, but if you dont, he wont" so, they call it law even thought none of these teachings are in the Law of moses, they make is seem like the gospel changed and its all about exalting the word grace.
Interestingly, he does repeat many times that what he teaches does not mean one could feel free to sin.
Why would he feel it necessary to repeat this?
Because the things he says and the way he preaches MAKES IT SEEM AS THOUGH we could do whatever we want to and it would be OK.
If he preached properly he would not have to speak this disclaimer on a continuous basis.
The very fact that he DOES have to say it, shows that something is wrong in how he's presenting the gospel.
As we know, this is known as hyper-grace. Grace is normal for God, hype-grace is not biblical.
I also agree with you regarding the progression of teaching.
JESUS comes first. (you'd think He was just a bystander!)
The Apostles come second.
I dare say Paul would come third.
This does not mean I have less respect for Paul. But he did NOT spend over 3 years with Jesus as the Apostles did.
He formulated the theology in Romans, but, as you said, he used a Language that causes problems.
But does it really? Or do people just pick and choose?
We love to post Romans, but many are not too interested in posting the later chapters of Romans because Paul does state that we are to BE and to DO. (chapters 12, 14, 15, 16)
He's trying to explain that we still must obey the commandments, but we now have a different way of doing this.
This is by Grace and not by Law. But the Law must still be obeyed. Jesus Himself said it is not abolished.
Some on this thread say that they follow the Law because they WANT to not because they HAVE to...and herein lies the problem. Although it's true that love makes you WANT to follow Jesus, it's not correct to say that this is WHY we have to follow it, but HOW we follow it.
So. Some undersand and some don't. I call it cheap grace. it cheapens what Jesus did for us. It makes those reading along believe that nothing is required from us, when in reality MUCH is required from us.
To whom much is given, much will be expected. Luke 12:48