Spiritual Confusion
- Thread starter Nehemiah6
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Your comments have no merit, since all you are trying to do is denigrate the KJB. No one in compelling you to use it, so keep on using your corrupt translation (whichever one you choose). But facts are facts. Not only did the KJB become the Authorized Version for the Anglican Church, but it became THE Bible for all Christians who speak English for 300 years, and continues to remain the only Bible for thousands of Christians who reject the modern corrupted Bibles. And that is the bottom line. As to that handful of so-called "mistakes" or "errors" which were posted, they are not even worth addressing (that is why I ignored them), when you look at the serious mutilation of the text in modern versions.
Objectively? Since when is there an objective standard of "best" to which all English-speaking Christians submit? This is your opinion only.
You are incorrect. First, you haven't a hot clue what I'm trying to do; you can't read my mind, and I haven't stated my goals. Second, you made "high and mighty" comments regarding the KJV; I countered them; simple as that.
Ah, the vaunted "bottom line" statement, as though it had any weight. When you make such statements about the KJV, and they don't stand up to criticism, you go on the attack. What a sad substitute for rational discussion.
This is a logical fallacy called "tu quoque". I'll leave it up to you to do your own homework. Needless to say, your argument is thereby invalidated.
You are incorrect. First, you haven't a hot clue what I'm trying to do; you can't read my mind, and I haven't stated my goals. Second, you made "high and mighty" comments regarding the KJV; I countered them; simple as that.
Ah, the vaunted "bottom line" statement, as though it had any weight. When you make such statements about the KJV, and they don't stand up to criticism, you go on the attack. What a sad substitute for rational discussion.
This is a logical fallacy called "tu quoque". I'll leave it up to you to do your own homework. Needless to say, your argument is thereby invalidated.
7
and of course nothing whatsoever to say about the errors in the KJV
quite telling. try to say I am making fun to skip over having to discuss the errors...only a few of which I posted
and all of that and more, is why the KJV only threads kind of sputter out after a while
prob like this one will because the real questions do not get the time of day while the posts become personal
nothing new under the sun...a line from another king
quite telling. try to say I am making fun to skip over having to discuss the errors...only a few of which I posted
and all of that and more, is why the KJV only threads kind of sputter out after a while
prob like this one will because the real questions do not get the time of day while the posts become personal
nothing new under the sun...a line from another king