Religion is not scientific, but the theory of evolution is. Saying that it is not, is advertising one’s ignorance.
The theory of evolution is a false science that can easily be disproven by the laws of science.
The irony is when you get down to it, the evolutionists treats the laws of science as if they are the theories that can bend in favor towards the evolution theory and yet treat the evolution theory as if it is law.
Stephen Jay Gould postulated the Punctuated Equilibrium or "Rapid Macroevolution" because the evidence in the fossil records do not support Gradual Macroevolution. But guess what? Now evolutionists are saying both are true.
Then you do an online search for dictionaries and colleges where the definitions of micro evolution and macro evolution stands apart, and yet some sites start changing it to blur in together.. and even some you can't tell apart at all, which is towards supporting Gradual Macroevolution.
Then they say that "evidence" proves that dinosaurs came from birds and not the other way around.
All these supposed facts of evolution are not facts and what they consider facts now cannot be facts because they cannot prove that macroevolution can happen. They assume much.
Two peer reviews on proof of macro evolution on volcanic islands with one on lizards macroing another kind of lizard never seen before and the same goes for another island about a new species of bird that was never seen on the island before.
Anybody up for throwing humans on that island to watch them macroevolve? Evolutionists firsts, right? Well, they are not.
If you are on stage in a theater and saw empty seats in an all white audience, and the lights dim and the spotlight is on the stage so you can't see to well out in the dark where the audience was, but after the play is over, you see black people in the audience, is that macro evolution? No. It is not.
Neither is claiming that new species that came out of nowhere as coming from that known species on the island. Just because they never noticed it before, it did not mean it was not on the island, They sure did not see it come from that "former species" that was still on the island.
The new species of lizards could have come from underground where they normally dwell which may be why it was rarely seen. The heat from that volcanic island forced them above ground.
The "new species" of birds may had shied away from public areas for all that time until lava flow burned all the foliage away that they are more visible now. Even El Nino or storms can drop off the birds.
So just because they spot something new before, doesn't mean it was never there.
They sure as shooting, did not prove that the new species came from that former species. They did not isolate the former species to see if the eggs they lay will come out as that new species. Same with the birds. All assumptions.
They are hardly being scientific about it in proving their assumptions and like all things evolution theory, they can never prove how old the earth really is when they get errant dating results from their methods as proven within human history, like a living mollusks carbon dated 2,300 years old dead.... so how can anyone believe their dating results when human history cannot even confirm it when it goes beyond human history to see if it is a mistake or not?
Just pointing out a false science that is the evolution theory. A scientist is to prove or disprove the hypothesis and as you can see by those two rave peer reviews on proof of macroevolution on a volcanic island, they did not apply any scientific method to prove their ASSUMPTIONS that the new species came from that former species for being on that volcanic island.
The theory of evolution is not scientific. It is a cult fad running amok in the field of science with no discipline in their scientific methods at all. It is a fairy tale that changes its "facts" as they make more assumptions on evidence found.
Usually when someone starts changing the facts of his story, he is seen and called a liar, but they continue because that is what they call is science which is so falsely called.
1 Timothy 6:[SUP]20 [/SUP]O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:[SUP] 21 [/SUP]Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
Romans 3:[SUP]4 [/SUP]God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.
(..............)
