Praise The Lord for those deliverances!We’ve had possessed individuals manifest in services. We didn’t tell them to leave. We prayed for them. Jesus set them free!
You can do whatever you want. but the word deacon (greek) was used.
You can't ignore it. Oh wait, thats right, You are KJO.
whatever, Believe what you wish. You asked for proof. I gave it.
the deacon would be better served to have a wifeA Deacon is not required to have a wife.
"Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife" is simply a directive against polygamy. It doesn't mean they MUST be married. Just that it isn't suitable for Christian leaders to have multiple wives.
When you people say "everyone" should be allowed to attend a service, those are the disgusting things you defend. So, you should change your opinion not to include "everyone".
the word decon = servant that all. many miss some very important truths about the servant, deacon, minster and it is in the word of God .
Please look at 1 Tim 3: 11 ...
GOD bless you sir. You are 93 years old! That is a blessing that GOD has kept you in HIS care!removed out of line
Do you understand why the Lord did this? Given it was supposed to be the High Priests (who were supposed to be closest to GOD) who interceded for the peopleJohn 2:13-22 [SUP]13[/SUP]When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. [SUP]14[/SUP]In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. [SUP]15[/SUP]So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. [SUP]16[/SUP]To those who sold doves he said, "Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father's house into a market!" [SUP]17[/SUP]His disciples remembered that it is written: "Zeal for your house will consume me." [SUP]18[/SUP]The Jews then responded to him, "What sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this?" [SUP]19[/SUP]Jesus answered them, "Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days." [SUP]20[/SUP]They replied, "It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and you are going to raise it in three days?" [SUP]21[/SUP]But the temple he had spoken of was his body. [SUP]22[/SUP]After he was raised from the dead, his disciples recalled what he had said. Then they believed the scripture and the words that Jesus had spoken.
Absolute proof that not just "anyone" or "anything" is allowed in God's house. For those who wish to believe otherwise, I suggest you read the scripture.
In many cases yes, though perhaps not in all. I think it depends on the individual. A bit like the "better to marry that to burn with lust" teaching. If you can serve better single, good then you don't have a family to be concerned for and can devote all of your time to The Lord. But it's better to marry than to burn with lust and as you have pointed out, your spouse can be beneficial in ministry.the deacon would be better served to have a wife
This is the BDF, there is no end to arguments. Just pauses.
You can do whatever you want. but the word deacon (greek) was used.
You can't ignore it. Oh wait, thats right, You are KJO.
whatever, Believe what you wish. You asked for proof. I gave it.
A Deacon is not required to have a wife.
"Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife" is simply a directive against polygamy. It doesn't mean they MUST be married. Just that it isn't suitable for Christian leaders to have multiple wives.
A Deacon is not required to have a wife.
"Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife" is simply a directive against polygamy. It doesn't mean they MUST be married. Just that it isn't suitable for Christian leaders to have multiple wives.
This is a key problem with you, specifically. You, specifically, aggregate all those who disagree with you into "you people".
"You people" don't say anything, because "you people" don't have ID's on this site. When you respond to someone, please address that specific person's comments, not the comments of everyone else who happens to agree with that person on some or all of the issue under discussion.
You can overlook this principle when you are intentionally addressing members of a group, which you are free to identify as you choose, but again, the more specifically you do so, the more likely your comments will receive response from those to whom it is addressed.
There is no rule on this site saying one cannot use "you people" to begin a posting. Who are you to be adding rules ? I happen to be free to address all that hold the same opinion anytime I wish. You should stop pretending you are the forum police and trying to make up your own rules.
do not do personal attacks