L
LOL!!!!!!
You are right!
Question answered: I doubt anyone here will agree with you...
Chapter 1 is a greater context of creation.
Chapter 2 is a lesser context, like an interesting subset that is only a small part of what was already created.
Don't be stupid now - if you think that is what I wrote then you have a problem with comprehending simple English!So you confess to knowing the LORD begat Cain?
You don't think a subset is within the context of the set it's contained in?
Oh...
Don't be stupid now - if you think that is what I wrote then you have a problem with comprehending simple English!
The Lord did NOT begat Cain - that is strictly your fantasy...
That would explain why you make provably false statements regarding the truth of Scripture.The blind cannot receive truth.
Cain and Abel was twins. At the time Adam laid with her(knew her) ,she bore Cain first,and then Abel followed behind him. It does not say Adam laid with her again and she concieved to have Abel. These two were born before the fall.
Context is your friend, if you could only comprehend it.You did say that didn't you?
I said the LORD is an illegitimate father, meaning he planted a seed and did not raise it.
And you said you're right.
I did not say that the Lord begat Cain, and I certainly did not say that the Lord is an illegitimate father either - all of this is your fantasy...You did say that didn't you?
I said the LORD is an illegitimate father, meaning he planted a seed and did not raise it.
And you said you're right.
There are rumors that this is the case
And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.
Oh ok, I see what you mean, one can use the NT version as an overlay of the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise.
"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived,
When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph,
and bare Cain,
they came together, .
and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"
she was found with child of the Holy Ghost
It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.
Pretty simply put isn't it?
I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
I did not say that did I?
The subset is not the entirety.
There are rumors that this is the case.
And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.
"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"
It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.
Pretty simply put isn't it?
I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
There are rumors that this is the case.
And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.
"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"
It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.
Pretty simply put isn't it?
I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
Lets not use any euphemisms here - it means Adam had sex with his wife - nothing more and nothing less...Your NOT reading it right! And Adam knew his wife;
The Bible is pretty clear in this area.. to Know each other is to become ONE!! Get the Picture!?
To become ONE is the only way to have children......
Cain is the SON of MAN, like you and me.
Yes, you did.
& every set is a subset of itself, so some subsets actually are the entirety![]()
Your NOT reading it right! And Adam knew his wife;
The Bible is pretty clear in this area.. to Know each other is to become ONE!! Get the Picture!?