P
pjharrison
Guest
I think you think it's all a game. 1 cor: 3 - 10.Do you think that Christian women should wear hijabs?
I think you think it's all a game. 1 cor: 3 - 10.Do you think that Christian women should wear hijabs?
The angels in 1 Cor 11:10 are demons.1 cor: 11:3 -10 What angels do you think the bible is referring to.
When people die, they are dead, and will remain so until one of the upcoming resurrections.It seems that some of you think this is a joke. This life determines where you live after you leave this earth. You don't just go to sleep. Your soul lives.
I think you think it's all a game. 1 cor: 3 - 10.
The angels in 1 Cor 11:10 are demons.
What is silly is your belief that demons have a particular affinity for women. They bug men and women equally.
It seems that some of you think this is a joke. This life determines where you live after you leave this earth. You don't just go to sleep. Your soul lives.
Angels (aggelos) have sinned:I agree that the belief is silly, but I disagree that the angels Paul wrote of there are demons. The two are different words, as shown in Romans 8:38 and 1 Cor 10:20. If Paul meant "demons" he would have written "demons" or "unclean spirits".
Angels (aggelos) have sinned:
2 Pet 2:
4) For if God spared not the angels (aggelos) that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;
I suggest that the angels in Rom 8:38 are fallen angels.I thought we were discussing Paul's letters, not Peter's.
I suggest that the angels in Rom 8:38 are fallen angels.
Rom 8:
38) For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
39) Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Why would "good" angels try to separate us from the love of God?
I edited my response, probably while you were replying..So check Paul's other uses of "angels". If they all, without exception, clearly denote unclean spirits, then you have a point. I don't believe they do.
Also, he needs to research the authenticity of 1 Cor 14:34-35.
Yes, preston. I think there's a good chance those verses were added.s...,
Are you suggesting it is not authentic?
Yes, preston. I think there's a good chance those verses were added.
You will probably take issue with that because of your KJV Only position...
You can research it if you like: https://www.google.com/search?q=1+C...ticity&oq=1+Corinthians+14+34-35+authenticity
We disagree.These verses are in the main text of critical edition of NA, so there is no good chance its added.
We disagree.
Yes.We can disagree
Yes.but we are just laymen,
Debatable on some verses.NA is an authority in this field.
Debatable on some verses.
You don't need a covering from the angels of GodI agree that the belief is silly, but I disagree that the angels Paul wrote of there are demons. The two are different words, as shown in Romans 8:38 and 1 Cor 10:20. If Paul meant "demons" he would have written "demons" or "unclean spirits".
Do you remember about story about lazarus and the rich man in (luke 16:20 - 31When people die, they are dead, and will remain so until one of the upcoming resurrections.