understood. thanks.I'm not saying he could not have.
I'm just saying that every indication supplied IN THE TEXT does NOT suggest that it was (UP IN Heaven). I named only one (Satan's response, which did NOT say, "FROM THE EARTH")
understood. thanks.I'm not saying he could not have.
I'm just saying that every indication supplied IN THE TEXT does NOT suggest that it was (UP IN Heaven). I named only one (Satan's response, which did NOT say, "FROM THE EARTH")
Quote them. Make sure the quotations include something like, "the image of God is...".On the contrary, scriptures do tell us what Gods image is by informing us that He is a spirit, and that He is love.
Of course angels do not create anything, but that is not the issue. The issue is whether they procreated and produced giants, mighty men, and men of renown, and the Bible confirms that. Please note that *sons of God* is repeated twice and contrasted with *the daughters of men*.Where in the Bible does it say angels create/created anything?
If the Lord informs me that He is spirit and non corporal, I then know that His image is not that of a physical being.Quote them. Make sure the quotations include something like, "the image of God is...".
In effect you deny and do not believe Gods Word by claiming love as an attribute of God, rather than God comprising Love as indicated in 1 John 4:8 & 16.Love is an attribute of God.
No denial on my part.In effect you deny and do not believe Gods Word
Love I believe is the greatest image we have of the Lord. I also, however, see Gods image being truth, light, forbearance, and a few other attributes.No denial on my part.
While you insist that God is love only, you deny what is written in John 4:24 which indicates God is Spirit, even going to far as to change what is written from "God is a Spirit" to "Yes, they who worship love, must worship love in their spirit and in truth" in Post #52.
Do you believe John 4:24 God is a Spirit ...?
Do you believe Galatians 5:22 the fruit of the Spirit is love ...?
From Thayer's Greek lexicon (underline, bold mine):
1 John 4:8 ὁ Θεός ἀγάπηἐστιν God is wholly love, his nature is summed up in love
Of course angels do not create anything, but that is not the issue. The issue is whether they procreated and produced giants, mighty men, and men of renown, and the Bible confirms that.
[…]
JUDE 1
6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.
Please note *in like manner* which connects the sexual sins of the angels with the sexual sins of Sodom and Gomorrah -- *going after strange flesh*.
k. thanks.To answer your questions: Yes God is a Spirit, and yes the fruit of the Spirit is love.
There is the carnal perspective for an image and there is a spiritual perspective for an image.k. thanks.
Have you ever considered that the image of God referenced in Gen 1:26-27 could be Spirit and that as such love being a fruit of the Spirit would have emanated from Adam and Eve prior to the fall?
In Gen 5:3 we read that Adam begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth and that Seth's image / likeness was after Adam's (in Adam's fallen state)?
All descendants of Adam are begotten in the likeness / image of their parents. I was born in the image / likeness of my father and mother. Who knows how many generations we are from Adam?
However, once a person is born again, he/she is a new creation in Christ (2 Cor 5:17).
There is the carnal perspective for an image and there is a spiritual perspective for an image.
Yes, the offspring of people will often have physical traits of their parents, but what has this carnal image have to do with an image of the Lord which is spiritual; i.e., love, truth, justice, patience, etc.?
I only asked if you had considered what was set forth in Post #89. If you have studied along those lines and reject it as "carnal" that is one thing. But if you have not considered it, that is another matter.There is the carnal perspective for an image and there is a spiritual perspective for an image.
Yes, the offspring of people will often have physical traits of their parents, but what has this carnal image have to do with an image of the Lord which is spiritual; i.e., love, truth, justice, patience, etc.?
Of course angels do not create anything, but that is not the issue. The issue is whether they procreated and produced giants, mighty men, and men of renown, and the Bible confirms that. Please note that *sons of God* is repeated twice and contrasted with *the daughters of men*.
GENESIS 6
1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
We can ask a hundred questions about this, but the key to understanding this is the imprisonment of these angels. That is always mentioned in connection with sexual sins.
2 PETER 2
4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, [Tartarus] and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;
5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;
6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned themwith an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;
7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds:
9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:
JUDE 1
6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.
Please note *in like manner* which connects the sexual sins of the angels with the sexual sins of Sodom and Gomorrah -- *going after strange flesh*.
Yes, all was corrupted at the fall, but did that eliminate the Lords image of love in man?All was corrupted at the fall.
The image of God referneced in Genesis 1:26-27 is Spirit; and the fruit of the Spirit (love) emanating from Adam and Eve, would have been Gods image in them, both prior to their fall, as well as after their fall.I only asked if you had considered what was set forth in Post #89. If you have studied along those lines and reject it as "carnal" that is one thing. But if you have not considered it, that is another matter.
Have you ever considered that the image of God referenced in Gen 1:26-27 could be Spirit and that as such love being a fruit of the Spirit would have emanated from Adam and Eve prior to the fall?
Was there any difference in Adam / Eve after the fall?The image of God referneced in Genesis 1:26-27 is Spirit; and the fruit of the Spirit (love) emanating from Adam and Eve, would have been Gods image in them, both prior to their fall, as well as after their fall.
Yes, when Adam chose the devil's lie over the Lord, Adam then died spiritually.Was there any difference in Adam / Eve after the fall?
It appears to me that you believe there was no difference in mankind after the fall.
However, we know from Gen 2:17 that God told Adam in the day he ate of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, dying he would die:
Genesis 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
In the Hebrew, the words "thou shalt surely die" literally mean "dying you shall die".
The spiritual death of Adam and Eve in the day they ate of the tree eventually resulted in their physical death.
In agreement. I believe the image of God is Spirit. At the time Adam and Eve fell, that image of God within them died (Gen 2:17 - dying you shall die). They then were physically alive (body and soul). They were spiritually dead.Yes, when Adam chose the devil's lie over the Lord, Adam then died spiritually.
They were no longer in God's image of Spirit.louis said:Does this mean that Adam and Eve were no longer in Gods image of love?
As future generations of Eve are described as the sons of God, indicating they were in the Lords image, I will then have to believe that Adam and Eve continued in Gods image of love.They were no longer in God's image of Spirit.
Love (the agapē love of God) being the fruit of the Spirit was reduced to the love mankind has: