This is the issue, this persons holier than though attitude is what gets him in trouble,
EG disagrees with many people, i disagree with people on end times, the age of the earth, i disagreed with an old mod (stillwater) and we even got heated, what we never did was attack and belittle each other because he was amill, and i was premil, he did scold me once and give me points because in a heated exchange i told a young lady she had no clue, but that was doing his job, and I was in the wrong, because i was out of line.
EG is not against CS1, and could really care less that we disagree (although do not tell him that, if you read his stuff look how he treats people who disagree with him! Granted he gets his fair share, but as my mother used to say, two wrongs do not make a right, and no matter what, a mod should be held to higher standards no matter what should he not) I am not against tongues or any of the gifts like he wants people to believe (i differ on how it is used today but that does not matter)
all EG wanted to discuss was a particular passage, not the doctrine itself, the same passage that EG had a discussion with people in another thread, where it did not get heated.
And what did we see?
1. He could spend time responding to every post of mine,
2. He acted as usual, with his snide remarks and belittling comments, and then outright lies (which offended another member by the way, to which he acted the same way to that member)
3. In all this time he could have easily answered my question (sorry “i do not know does not cut it, if he did not know, then he admitted he could be wrong to begin with, yet he attacked others for not knowing Gods word)
But its ok, like i said, he left, and came back, i was hoping he saw the light, i see nothing changed, of course we expect people who agree with him to love his words, and his spunk, but again, two wrongs do not make a right, you can disagree without all the nasty, in your face comments which never once in the history of mankinf proven one person right, people have gon as far as killing others for disagreeing with them did that prove they were right?