Did Jesus ever tell us that we no longer need to keep the law of Moses?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
#21
where in scripture is this "law dispensation" found?

To my understanding, God is eternal and doesn't change. Scripture gives us these principle established at creation and that creation doesn't change according to a year we are living in God's creation.
You subscribed to covenant theology and yes, that is their general viewpoint about scripture.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,774
113
#22
Hi again Marcelo, I guess the thing we need to figure out is what did Paul mean when he said that Christians are no longer, "under the law"?
To be "under the Law" would mean that the Old Covenant would remain in full force, including the temple, the Levitical priesthood, and all the sacrifices and offerings. Which would nullify the finished work of Christ.

But the New Covenant has made the majority of the laws under the Old Covenant null and void ( excepting the Ten Commandments and a few others). They have been incorporated into the Law of Christ under the New Covenant. But they must be obeyed by the power of the indwelling Holy Spirit.
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
#23
No, Christ did not teach that.
Christ taught "follow me". Do you refute that? Christ obeyed His Father in regard to honoring the days His Father told Him to honor. Are you also opposed to this fact?
 

FollowHisSteps

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2019
3,674
1,201
113
#24
I'm not a law-keeper, but I still haven't found a single piece of evidence -- in the Gospels -- that Jesus ever told us to stop keeping the Law. Should we rely solely on what Paul said?
8 Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for he who
loves his fellowman has fulfilled the law.
9 The commandments, "Do not commit adultery, Do not murder, Do not steal, Do not covet," and
whatever other commandment there may be, are summed up in this one rule: "Love your neighbor as yourself."
10 Love does no harm to its neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.
Rom 13

37 Jesus replied: "'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'
38 This is the first and greatest commandment.
39 And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'
40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments."
Matt 22

13 When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you
alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins,
14 having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed
to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross.
15 And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing
over them by the cross.
16 Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival,
a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day.
Col 2

We are called to love our neighbour which fulfils the law in Christ, who has cancelled the written code,
making us the temples of the living God.

The whole sacrificial system was to point towards the holiness of God, who could only be approached
through the sacrifice of animals and their blood for the forgiveness of sins and thereby cleansing the
hearts of Gods people.

In Jesus and the cross all the sacrificial system and temple is replaced along with all its rules and ceremonies,
establishing our communion with God in our hearts.

Jesus preached love through following Him, which through the cross has now made possible.
 

Word_Swordsman

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2014
1,666
100
48
#25
Christ taught "follow me". Do you refute that? Christ obeyed His Father in regard to honoring the days His Father told Him to honor. Are you also opposed to this fact?
Jesus and His apostles were “Jews” who had to keep the Law of Moses or be rightly punished according to the Law. His teachings were never contrary to it. So no, Jesus would be disqualified if a sinner, and told none not to keep the Law since the hearers would remain bound to it until death.

The Law held them under it’s authority until physical death. When Jesus died He was freed. He then arose to new life and the fullness of the New Covenant preached to come by the prophets.

Jesus’ hearers had one hope of His success that hinged on Him defeating death and the grave and the binding fear of it which was the power of Satan over them. The Resurrection sealed His victory and the following 40 days among the living confirmed it. The apostles were at last freed to preach the gospel as God planned.

Finishing the work didn’t make a bit of the Law vanish. It remains over men until each dies to sin in Christ and rises to new life in Him. It has no power over Christians.

We ought never insult the Law since it is holy. As already stated earlier, our only obligation to not offend Jews is to avoid those four sins. Circumscision was totally annulled for gentiles. In the place of keeping the Law of flesh we must love God and neighbor.
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,429
6,707
113
#26
Jesus and His apostles were “Jews” who had to keep the Law of Moses or be rightly punished according to the Law. His teachings were never contrary to it. So no, Jesus would be disqualified if a sinner, and told none not to keep the Law since the hearers would remain bound to it until death.

The Law held them under it’s authority until physical death. When Jesus died He was freed. He then arose to new life and the fullness of the New Covenant preached to come by the prophets.

Jesus’ hearers had one hope of His success that hinged on Him defeating death and the grave and the binding fear of it which was the power of Satan over them. The Resurrection sealed His victory and the following 40 days among the living confirmed it. The apostles were at last freed to preach the gospel as God planned.

Finishing the work didn’t make a bit of the Law vanish. It remains over men until each dies to sin in Christ and rises to new life in Him. It has no power over Christians.

We ought never insult the Law since it is holy. As already stated earlier, our only obligation to not offend Jews is to avoid those four sins. Circumscision was totally annulled for gentiles. In the place of keeping the Law of flesh we must love God and neighbor.
Listening to Jesus, His teaching, you will find He authorizd even the Jews wh heard Him in His "sermon on the mount" to disobey certain writings of the OT...…….Was He sinning in so doing ? Was He "under the law?"

I am not under the law, but I do obey as best I am given to be able because my new character recognizes all laws tha make up love.

By my new heart I KNOW which laws are merciful and which are not, and I know which laws make up LOV E:

It grievesme to hear self-proclained believers seeking the sin of others while they claim the law is dead…….all contrary to Christ, Yeshua.

God bless all in Jesus, Yeshua, and all who will be, amen.
 

Word_Swordsman

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2014
1,666
100
48
#27
There was no provision for man to observe sabbath day until Moses. It was made part of the observances, not for gentiles who had their own laws. So when Jesus died to the Law He died to that seventh day sabbath along with it. That authorized Paul to declare an end of all observances including Passover, among New Covenant believers. Reviving those elements would end faith benefits and resume carnal living appeasing flesh.
 

Word_Swordsman

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2014
1,666
100
48
#28
Listening to Jesus, His teaching, you will find He authorizd even the Jews wh heard Him in His "sermon on the mount" to disobey certain writings of the OT...…….Was He sinning in so doing ? Was He "under the law?"

I am not under the law, but I do obey as best I am given to be able because my new character recognizes all laws tha make up love.

By my new heart I KNOW which laws are merciful and which are not, and I know which laws make up LOV E:

It grievesme to hear self-proclained believers seeking the sin of others while they claim the law is dead…….all contrary to Christ, Yeshua.

God bless all in Jesus, Yeshua, and all who will be, amen.
Carefully research what you think were His Law breaches which were actually commandments of the Pharisees. Even so it was wisdom to not offend those men lest one be stoned by them. The Pharisees dared sit in Moses’ seat.
 

Word_Swordsman

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2014
1,666
100
48
#29
The Pharisees and Scribes and some priests were Law distorters by adding burdens of their “interpretations”. They held undue power over all Israel, drawing righteous indignation of Jesus who was always the greater Law expert who applied far more righteous mercy under the Law.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#30
I'm not a law-keeper, but I still haven't found a single piece of evidence -- in the Gospels -- that Jesus ever told us to stop keeping the Law. Should we rely solely on what Paul said?
He told us we CAN”T keep the law. (Which is why he had to come and die) And he also told us the law was not given to show us how to be righteous people. But to prove to us how sinful we are.

So not sure of your question.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#31
Thanks, Nehemiah! The purpose of this thread is to show that Jesus and Paul didn't preach the exact same thing as most, if not all, traditional churches teach.
So jesus and paul contradicted each other? :eek:
 
Jun 2, 2019
53
10
8
#32
2 Every way of a man is right in his own eyes: but the LORD pondereth the hearts.

Correct me if i am wrong i want to say what i know i am also stuck here

36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?

37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.

38 This is the first and great commandment.

39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

so all the law and prophets are hang on these 2 commandments i see so we don't need to do other commandments except for this two

but looking on verse 37 how to love?

we were taught by christ how to love in this verse

15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

therefore if we love the LORD and God we should keep their commandments so all of them? including moses? so in the end we need to keep all of the commandments? including stoning people to their deaths....... ..... ... or ami just jumping to conclusion
 

Word_Swordsman

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2014
1,666
100
48
#33
So jesus and paul contradicted each other? :eek:
Good choice of emoticon.

I note how little the apostles caught on to. They sure dropped the ball at Calvary. There was no way they could comprehend His fulfillment of the Law until after the cross. Jesus got their attention then, and as He promised the Holy Spirit finished delivering the full gospel. it’s all in the Book.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#34
Good choice of emoticon.

I note how little the apostles caught on to. They sure dropped the ball at Calvary. There was no way they could comprehend His fulfillment of the Law until after the cross. Jesus got their attention then, and as He promised the Holy Spirit finished delivering the full gospel. it’s all in the Book.
That was part of the hidden mystery paul spoke of.

When God opened their eyes (and eventually Paul’s on the way to Damascus) the gospel was known.

But remember, Paul told timothy as a child he had enough knowledge to be saved, I am almost certain Timothy was a child BEFORE Christ died.

The gospel never changed, (grace through faith) the knowledge of what it truly meant did (Christ)
 

Word_Swordsman

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2014
1,666
100
48
#35
2 Every way of a man is right in his own eyes: but the LORD pondereth the hearts.

Correct me if i am wrong i want to say what i know i am also stuck here

36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?

37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.

38 This is the first and great commandment.

39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

so all the law and prophets are hang on these 2 commandments i see so we don't need to do other commandments except for this two

but looking on verse 37 how to love?

we were taught by christ how to love in this verse

15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

therefore if we love the LORD and God we should keep their commandments so all of them? including moses? so in the end we need to keep all of the commandments? including stoning people to their deaths....... ..... ... or ami just jumping to conclusion
The Church got it straight after the Resurrection. The Jews that didn’t follow Jesus kept what they already had since Moses to this day.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#36
2 Every way of a man is right in his own eyes: but the LORD pondereth the hearts.

Correct me if i am wrong i want to say what i know i am also stuck here

36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?

37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.

38 This is the first and great commandment.

39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

so all the law and prophets are hang on these 2 commandments i see so we don't need to do other commandments except for this two

but looking on verse 37 how to love?

we were taught by christ how to love in this verse

15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

therefore if we love the LORD and God we should keep their commandments so all of them? including moses? so in the end we need to keep all of the commandments? including stoning people to their deaths....... ..... ... or ami just jumping to conclusion
I think it goes something like this

If your trying to obey commands by self will. You will fail

If your loving God and all others (even your enemy) by nature you will keep the commands.

The cammonds b y themselves did not teach how to obey them, only the end result. Jesus, in this passage, showed the secret to obeying them
 

Word_Swordsman

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2014
1,666
100
48
#37
That was part of the hidden mystery paul spoke of.

When God opened their eyes (and eventually Paul’s on the way to Damascus) the gospel was known.

But remember, Paul told timothy as a child he had enough knowledge to be saved, I am almost certain Timothy was a child BEFORE Christ died.

The gospel never changed, (grace through faith) the knowledge of what it truly meant did (Christ)
What the Church received was a better covenant than the old so it did change.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#38
What the Church received was a better covenant than the old so it did change.
The old was never given to save. As paul said in galations, It was given to prove to us we need saved. Ie, expose our sin. So we would seek what God would do to save them, or for us, seek christ who came.

So yes it was a better, because that covenant actually saved people

But salvation has been the same from the time of Noah until today.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,838
13,558
113
#39
Hi, Deut! In Romans 6:14 Paul wrote: "For sin shall no longer be your master, because you are not under the law, but under grace ".
'not under law' is not the same thing as 'do not obey the law'

Suppose you have two people, one under law and one above it. In both cases the individual can either keep or disregard the law - but the one under it, if he disregards it, is liable to be punished under the law, however the one not under it, if he does not keep the law, is not liable to be punished by the law.
This doesn't change anything about the goodness or injustice of whatever law we're talking about - and doesn't say anything about whether the person not under the law can or cannot do the things in the law ((whatever arbitrary law we talk about)). It just means the person not under law is not compelled by the law at all, not required, not punished, not condemned - but the person under the law is, in every way.

One individual is free and the other is not.