As a previous Trinitarian Pastor, I'm well aware of what Trinity doctrine is; and I wasn't presenting an ill-thought-out caricature. I was illustrating a point, not misunderstanding Trinity. I said Trinis only present 1/3 of God manifest in the flesh. You said that was a new religion, when it's Trinitarianism.
Do you insist that the Father and the Holy Spirit were manifest in the flesh also? Were all three God-persons manifest in the flesh? You don't understand the ramifications of multiple distinct whole persons as being the fullness of God in one Incarnation. Trinity is either only 1/3 of God manifest in the flesh, or all three God-persons manifest in the flesh.
Perichoresis and other layers of man-made doctrinal "extensions" don't account for these difficulties. At some point, threeness has to become a more literal oneness than Trinity callisthenics can accomodate and represent. You just don't/won't/can't see those limitations.
I directly addressed those personal pronouns. If you understood all the various God-models, you would have understood my answer. The procreative act of the Virgin Birth produced the God-man with a rational soul and a spirit. I contrasted it to a Unitarian view of the Incarnation with the caveat of maintaining God's Divine substance. While Incarnate, the Son had the same human traits and capacity to address God as "you/your" as any man. It wasn't Jesus' divine will as a separate God-person that was praying for the cup to pass.
Jesus was God's WORD made flesh. That Word was the entire Rhema Divine Content AND the Logos Divine Expression. That Word was God. It contained God's Divine substance, making Jesus the express image of that substance.
The Logos was God's OWN Logos Word. HE spoke it. The Logos wasn't a separate person. The Logos was God's OWN person, manifest as the prosopon of Jesus.
Do you insist that the Father and the Holy Spirit were manifest in the flesh also? Were all three God-persons manifest in the flesh? You don't understand the ramifications of multiple distinct whole persons as being the fullness of God in one Incarnation. Trinity is either only 1/3 of God manifest in the flesh, or all three God-persons manifest in the flesh.
Perichoresis and other layers of man-made doctrinal "extensions" don't account for these difficulties. At some point, threeness has to become a more literal oneness than Trinity callisthenics can accomodate and represent. You just don't/won't/can't see those limitations.
I directly addressed those personal pronouns. If you understood all the various God-models, you would have understood my answer. The procreative act of the Virgin Birth produced the God-man with a rational soul and a spirit. I contrasted it to a Unitarian view of the Incarnation with the caveat of maintaining God's Divine substance. While Incarnate, the Son had the same human traits and capacity to address God as "you/your" as any man. It wasn't Jesus' divine will as a separate God-person that was praying for the cup to pass.
Jesus was God's WORD made flesh. That Word was the entire Rhema Divine Content AND the Logos Divine Expression. That Word was God. It contained God's Divine substance, making Jesus the express image of that substance.
The Logos was God's OWN Logos Word. HE spoke it. The Logos wasn't a separate person. The Logos was God's OWN person, manifest as the prosopon of Jesus.
Have a nice day.