Is YOUR church doctrinal statement ONE with SATAN?
- Thread starter ChosenbyHim
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
All children are created by God and yes, there are those that die in the womb. There are also those that die because some doctor stuck a sharp instrument in their brain to kill them. In New York it is now legal to kill a child that is ready to be born if you can kill it before it sticks its head out of the mother. Based on yours posts on this topic I would surmise that you are OK with this law in New York that legalizes murder. This is just pure sick.
-
1
- Show all
This is an excerpt from the Hippocratic Oath pertaining to abortion:
I will use treatment to help the sick according to my ability and judgment, but never with a view to injury and wrong-doing. Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course. Similarly I will not give to a woman a pessary to cause abortion.
According to this it is a malpractice for a doctor to perform an abortion within the practice of medicine as it is in violation of the oath.
I will use treatment to help the sick according to my ability and judgment, but never with a view to injury and wrong-doing. Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course. Similarly I will not give to a woman a pessary to cause abortion.
According to this it is a malpractice for a doctor to perform an abortion within the practice of medicine as it is in violation of the oath.
Umm, I care for 'every word' and what is in the text the Kjv regarding born again is sensibly correct. John146 is simply stating doubting Gods word and when in doubt, a change is necessary to which many follows the effect of God's word which is to alter that goes beyond and have it corrupted in the sense, the word become impure. But anyway, i might have miss some things of your previous conversation and i jump in but it is my belief that the Kjv is correct in rendering the phrase born again.☺
I don't understand why people put so much faith in copies of copies of copies of fragments of originals that don't exist anymore. Maybe God purposely caused those FRAGMENTS to never be found so that LIBERAL THEOLOGIANS that support Antifa, the democrats and abortion could mislead people. I don't know why it's not in those old pieces of worthless junk, but it OBVIOUS that it was there.
Here are places where we find mention of 1 John 5:7, from about 200 AD through the 1500s.
200 ADTertullian wrote "which three are one" based on the verse in his Against Praxeas, chapter 25.250 ADCyprian of Carthage, wrote, "And again, of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost it is written: "And the three are One" in his On The Lapsed, On the Novatians, (see note for Old Latin)350 ADPriscillian referred to it [Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, Academia Litterarum Vindobonensis, vol. xviii, p. 6.]350 ADIdacius Clarus referred to it [Patrilogiae Cursus Completus, Series Latina by Migne, vol. 62, col. 359.]350 ADAthanasius referred to it in his De Incarnatione398 ADAurelius Augustine used it to defend Trinitarianism in De Trinitate against the heresy of Sabellianism415 ADCouncil of Carthage appealed to 1 John 5:7 when debating the Arian belief (Arians didn't believe in the deity of Jesus Christ)450-530 ADSeveral orthodox African writers quoted the verse when defending the doctrine of the Trinity against the gainsaying of the Vandals. These writers are:
A) Vigilius Tapensis in "Three Witnesses in Heaven"
B) Victor Vitensis in his Historia persecutionis [Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, Academia Litterarum Vindobonensis, vol. vii, p. 60.]
C) Fulgentius in "The Three Heavenly Witnesses" [Patrilogiae Cursus Completus, Series Latina by Migne, vol. 65, col. 500.]500 ADCassiodorus cited it [Patrilogiae Cursus Completus, Series Latina by Migne, vol. 70, col. 1373.]550 ADOld Latin ms r has it550 ADThe "Speculum" has it [The Speculum is a treatise that contains some good Old Latin scriptures.]750 ADWianburgensis referred to it800 ADJerome's Vulgate has it [It was not in Jerome's original Vulgate, but was brought in about 800 AD from good Old Latin manuscripts.]1000s ADminiscule 635 has it1150 ADminuscule ms 88 in the margin1300s ADminiscule 629 has it157-1400 ADWaldensian (that is, Vaudois) Bibles have the verse1500 ADms 61 has the verseEven Nestle's 26th edition Greek New Testament, based upon the corrupt Alexandrian text, admits that these and other important manuscripts have the verse: 221 v.l.; 2318 Vulgate [Claromontanus]; 629; 61; 88; 429 v.l.; 636 v.l.; 918; l; r.
Here are places where we find mention of 1 John 5:7, from about 200 AD through the 1500s.
200 ADTertullian wrote "which three are one" based on the verse in his Against Praxeas, chapter 25.250 ADCyprian of Carthage, wrote, "And again, of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost it is written: "And the three are One" in his On The Lapsed, On the Novatians, (see note for Old Latin)350 ADPriscillian referred to it [Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, Academia Litterarum Vindobonensis, vol. xviii, p. 6.]350 ADIdacius Clarus referred to it [Patrilogiae Cursus Completus, Series Latina by Migne, vol. 62, col. 359.]350 ADAthanasius referred to it in his De Incarnatione398 ADAurelius Augustine used it to defend Trinitarianism in De Trinitate against the heresy of Sabellianism415 ADCouncil of Carthage appealed to 1 John 5:7 when debating the Arian belief (Arians didn't believe in the deity of Jesus Christ)450-530 ADSeveral orthodox African writers quoted the verse when defending the doctrine of the Trinity against the gainsaying of the Vandals. These writers are:
A) Vigilius Tapensis in "Three Witnesses in Heaven"
B) Victor Vitensis in his Historia persecutionis [Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, Academia Litterarum Vindobonensis, vol. vii, p. 60.]
C) Fulgentius in "The Three Heavenly Witnesses" [Patrilogiae Cursus Completus, Series Latina by Migne, vol. 65, col. 500.]500 ADCassiodorus cited it [Patrilogiae Cursus Completus, Series Latina by Migne, vol. 70, col. 1373.]550 ADOld Latin ms r has it550 ADThe "Speculum" has it [The Speculum is a treatise that contains some good Old Latin scriptures.]750 ADWianburgensis referred to it800 ADJerome's Vulgate has it [It was not in Jerome's original Vulgate, but was brought in about 800 AD from good Old Latin manuscripts.]1000s ADminiscule 635 has it1150 ADminuscule ms 88 in the margin1300s ADminiscule 629 has it157-1400 ADWaldensian (that is, Vaudois) Bibles have the verse1500 ADms 61 has the verseEven Nestle's 26th edition Greek New Testament, based upon the corrupt Alexandrian text, admits that these and other important manuscripts have the verse: 221 v.l.; 2318 Vulgate [Claromontanus]; 629; 61; 88; 429 v.l.; 636 v.l.; 918; l; r.
The KJV is a copy of the Greek to Latin Vulgate, so it is essentially a copy of a copy. The only difference however, is that it did not copy and went off onto its own tangent. How can something following something be legit when it chooses its own path?
Satan chose his own path, should we follow him as well?
But the real point is, that's only ONE EXAMPLE where the KJV decided to choose its own path. Do you want to see the others where they do not follow what actually and factually was said but made it up as they went?