if you are to become one of the 'called-elect-chosen', then mayhaps
your will eventually, hopefully, become enlightened...
your will eventually, hopefully, become enlightened...
No.Each thing happens in its season.
Do you believe you are treated unjustly because Jesus didn't appear physically to you like to Thomas?
I have no idea what any of that means.that's good to hear BL,
hopefully you will learn, as the rest of us, to look forward to accepting God on His terms,
and not yours...
You serve at Gods pleasure not the other way around.You acknowledge his death was for a purpose.
Well, he is welcome to appear to me and allow me to do the same.
You are welcome to seek Pink Elephants with all your heart and perhaps They will let you find Them.You serve at Gods pleasure not the other way around.
You are welcome to seek Him with all your heart and perhaps He will let you find Him.
Well if you DO NOT believe God exists it would be pointless.You are welcome to seek Pink Elephants with all your heart and perhaps They will let you find Them.
Like in the way that you see your favourite number everywhere?Well if you DO NOT believe God exists it would be pointless.
It is required:
To have faith in something in order to seek it with all your heart.
To have faith that finding it would be a good thing.
It can get frustrating trying to find faith in a cerebral way. Been there, done that.You are welcome to seek Pink Elephants with all your heart and perhaps They will let you find Them.
I don't deny Jesus Christ, I prayed to Jesus giving thanks, then I enjoyed that 24oz Porterhouse, it was good!The Lord does not accept the blood of animals to feed His, that is what the pagans did. Isaiah 1:11 "The multitude of your sacrifices-- what are they to me?" says the LORD. "I have more than enough of burnt offerings, of rams and the fat of fattened animals; I have no pleasure in the blood of bulls and lambs and goats.
The Lord gave His Son to pay for our sins, and it is only through him that that payment is effective. It has always been so. When the symbolic blood was given without knowing God gave blood on the altar (Christ) and they were to give up their sins and accept that payment for them, it was useless. Read all about the sacrificial system in the first chapters of Leviticus.
Lev. 17:11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood and I have given it for you upon the altar to make an atonement for your sins.
If you are using a bull instead of Christ for your sacrifice, you deny Christ.
Oh seriously? Wow. Do you make statements like that in absolute ignorance, or are you trying to be a troll?Reanimation does not refute the fact that a sacrifice took place.
Not there's any historical evidence of his coming back to life, but that's something else altogether.
Did you miss the "24 oz porterhouse" part of his post? He ate a steak for supper.The Lord does not accept the blood of animals to feed His, that is what the pagans did. Isaiah 1:11 "The multitude of your sacrifices-- what are they to me?" says the LORD. "I have more than enough of burnt offerings, of rams and the fat of fattened animals; I have no pleasure in the blood of bulls and lambs and goats.
The Lord gave His Son to pay for our sins, and it is only through him that that payment is effective. It has always been so. When the symbolic blood was given without knowing God gave blood on the altar (Christ) and they were to give up their sins and accept that payment for them, it was useless. Read all about the sacrificial system in the first chapters of Leviticus.
Lev. 17:11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood and I have given it for you upon the altar to make an atonement for your sins.
If you are using a bull instead of Christ for your sacrifice, you deny Christ.
Yes, I missed it. But my post was NOT to oppose truth 717 but the aim was to praise the Lord for the sacrificial system that included sacrificing blood. My post explains why.Did you miss the "24 oz porterhouse" part of his post? He ate a steak for supper.
Yes. Jesus was a sacrifice.Uh, God isnt impressed with any of our sacrifices as Hes already made the ultimate sacrifice of his son Jesus.
He miraculously rose again something that all those dead beasts sacrificed never did.
The difference between your statement and the majority of others, is that you declare Jesus was “A” sacrifice, as opposed to His declaration that He offered Himself up in eternity past; that He is “The” sacrifice that all of the others were teaching, and pointing to.Yes. Jesus was a sacrifice.
What's the distinction?The difference between your statement and the majority of others, is that you declare Jesus was “A” sacrifice, as opposed to His declaration that He offered Himself up in eternity past; that He is “The” sacrifice that all of the others were teaching, and pointing to.
What one thinks of Jesus is a pivotal point in the life of every human.
The distiction between being merely one sacrifice among many vs the ultimate sacrifice for the world, is that both cannot be true. Either Jesus is who He says He is, or He is just another con man. That is the choice you and I and the world will ultimately make.What's the distinction?
Yes. Jesus was a sacrifice.
Yes. He sacrificed himself. Well done.No, Jesus sacrificed.
The lambs and goats had no choice....but Jesus did.
He sacrificed... meaning He relinquished His life and then rose from the dead.