Can I get that with Bolognese?I see you need help too.
"Capisci"![]()
Can I get that with Bolognese?I see you need help too.
"Capisci"![]()
Luke 19:26-27
'For I say to you, that to everyone who has will be given; and from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him. But bring here those enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, and slay [them] before me.'"
if i sat around like a monk and waited, i'd look like your avatar before long
You neglected to add Luke 20 16
Luke 19 26 is a parable.
Friend, im not gonna play hide and seek.
if i sat around like a monk and waited, i'd look like your avatar before long...
You asked me before not who was christ, but who is the lord
what about you; who do you say that Jesus is?
have you sorted out who you say Christ is?
maybe i've been waiting a while![]()
Christ was convicted by the law, Adam and Eve were convicted by oral law. Traditions both.
Bible say there are three that testify, the father, the word and the holy ghost. From/with these we find peace, and thru these we are a blessing upon the earth. I can find no record within the words of christ only, where blood or violence or any of the works condoned in the old testament or the new testament are attributed to the father, the christ, the holy spirit.
The two i spoke of is men and the enemy of man together.
I am still trying to figure out what the two of you are trying to work out ..............and so far I cannot figure it out.... but I am also looking
pretty emaciated... so please figure it out soon... I need to eat!!
Wow are you a straight up gnostic? Yikes. Do you think the copious amounts of quotes from Deuteronomy, Numbers, and Exodus Jesus sprinkled into His speeches were meant to somehow distance the Father from YHVH and stories of judgment like the flood or the judgment of Egypt?You neglected to add Luke 20 16. According to your understanding, christ is saying in luke 19 26 He wants his servants to bring to him his enemies and kill them at his feet. And luke 20 16 says God will come and kill the tenants of the earth b/c they killed his son.
Luke 19 26 is a parable. reminds me of joshua, saying come put your feet on these kings necks, but thats not what he said, nor did he quote any old testament verses there, although he surely could have found a few....If you want to say he was led by the holy spirit to say this, then would he have told Zacchius to return what he had stolen? Or would he not have fell dead at christ feet? Acts 5 3
Luke 20 16 Here he is standing in the midst of those who were saying God/ Holy Spirit led them to kill, burn, take etc. The same spirit they claimed was leading them to kill him, while christ stood. right. in. front of them. He is saying here i am, here is the father, here is the holy spirit, if someone is leading you kill me, then, who is the lord??? In a way, their god did kill them, to twist a truth saying, god led them attack the nations around them, and the nations around them attacked them. Saying God would kill men on earth, because of the actions of one nation doesn't seem likely, and is counter to doctring, maybe there is a greater truth here, having to do with the reason men have wars and men die at all. But if you want to believe men die b/c God is vengeful and christ is saying, i will have my servants kill you if you do not acknowledge my divinity/ kingship/lordship or whatever, then the israelites were right, all along, b/c that is what they did for jehovah, and why, then, was he so mad at them?
In Victoria right now which is in lockdown, one cannot travel mkre than like 5 K (3.1 miles) from their home unless absolutely necessary (like those being allowed to work, doctors app. etc.) and if you have a grocery store in your area and get caught in a different store out of your area it is like a $5000 fine or something and or possible jail)
There's an Italian mama somewhere who should be ashamed of herself.I am still trying to figure out what the two of you are trying to work out ..............and so far I cannot figure it out.... but I am also looking
pretty emaciated... so please figure it out soon... I need to eat!!
I was joking @posthuman I forgot the smiley face.
I am eating now and rereading I think I am getting it now.... keep going you are on a roll... I can help >>>> Jesus was both God and man.
You could say that, but it would be apparent that you are trying to avoid dealing with the divinity of Jesus, as is clearly taught in Scripture.Man is born of God. God is not born. He remains supernatural without nature a beginning or without end of Spirit life. He is Eternal Spirit
You could say what was born was the propmised demonstration of the lamb of God slain for the sins of the world . . from the beginning the foundation of the world. Promised in Isaiah 53. The demonstration is over. We walk by faith not by sight.
It's laughable that you, without even a high-school education, think you understand Scripture better than a scholar with decades of experience. If the Holy Spirit were indeed teaching you, it would be possible; however, given your heretical views on other matters, it is clear that you aren't learning from the Holy Spirit either.
I have seen many people spiritualize the 42 months to mean the entire church age or a "1260 years" or something like that. Year for a day principle is atleast Biblical, but if that is used its usually mentioned like in the 70 weeks of Daniel.The Antichrist has been given ONLY 42 MONTHS to rule the world. That proves that the pope is not the Antichrist.
And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. (Rev 13:5)
42 months = 1260 days = 3 1/2 years = time (1 yr) + times (2 yrs) +half a time (6 months). This is the first half of a seven-year period called Daniel's 70th Week.