You're missing so much in Job. There certainly was a degree of ignorance being spoken, but God's answer to Job wasn't to deny accountability. In fact God coming to answer for Himself affirms our ability to hold God to His character.
One of the things that is easily missed about that book is it is structured like a ANE trial with Job's 3 friends in the role of prosecutor. Then Job makes a sworn declaration of innocence which requires God to make an accusation. In steps Elihu who declares that he is speaking for God and holds up God's majesty and Job's lowliness as grounds for God not answering Job and Elihu accuses Job of sinning.
So what does God do? He answers Job and doesn't accuse him. Instead God presents the manner in which He cares for creation and arranges grand and small details to demonstrate that nothing escapes His notice. God in essence affirms Job's statements of innocence, though censuring him for some of his speech that was done in ignorance. God's argument is not "you are too lowly to question me," but rather "do you think anything escapes my notice?"
Yet as I predicted earlier your view is more in line with Elihu than Job, as you presume to speak for God.