That was not the issue. The issue was that I said the ass prophesied and you disagreed. I quoted 1st Corinthians 14:3 to show that any inspired speaking unto admonition, exhortation and/or comfort by the Holy Spirit, was defined as prophecy.
If someone speaks revelatory words to the congregation at the moving of the Holy Spirit, he speaks to comfort, edification, and exhortation. That does not mean anyone who speaks of comfort, edification, or exhortation is speaking under the moving of the Spirit. If you look at Romans 12, prophesying and exhortation are treated as two distinct gifts. Teaching is also treated as a separate gift in that passage. Prophets and teachers are different ministries in I Corinthians 12. Prophets are a different category from pastors and teachers in Ephesians 4.
Let's say two prisoners are talking to each other. One of them says to the other, "Don't worry. The parole board will let you out next week and you will still get to be with your children during their holiday break from school." Those are comforting words, but the next week, the parole board says no, and the guy ends up in jail. It wasn't a prophecy, just comforting words.
You then disagreed and gave, as your reason, that prophecy was rather defined in 2nd Peter 1:21. That is, the Holy Spirit "moving" on a speaker. I countered with my question as to why you regard prophecy as being moved by the Holy Spirit, but don't think a dumb animal speaking in the middle of a situation where God is trying to make a statement is NOT God moving. The short of it is,
- If it was the Holy Spirit that gave revelation and utterance to the ass, it is, by your definition in 2nd Peter 1 - prophecy
- If was not the Holy Spirit, who then "moved" the ass, first to see danger, second to save his master's life, and third, to speak?
- If you are unable to show otherwise, the ass spoke as he was moved by the Holy Spirit and, by YOUR selection of 2nd Peter 1, the ass PROPHESIED
Whether the donkey admonished, edified, or exhorted Balaam is not the issue. The passage says that the Lord opened the mouth of the donkey and she spoke to Balaam. It does not say that God gave the donkey a prophetic message. When the donkey asked why Balaam "What have I done unto thee, that thou hast smitten me these three times?", she was not asking why Balaam had smitted the Lord. She was enabled to speak, and then spoke. There is no evidence that the donkey prophesied.