He says energy is sin... meaning God either has no energy or God has sin.
Like I said: he destroys his own arguments
Decoherent energy is part of this fallen condition. Do you remember who the prince of the power of the air is?
Is the double slit experiment proof of original sin?
- Thread starter pittsburghjoe
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Decoherent energy is part of this fallen condition. Do you remember who the prince of the power of the air is?
What part of Fallen reality history, the Creation of Adam, or Adam being the first to walk upright and have a partial functioning brain?
He claims A&E were not physical until God clothed them wih the flesh of an animal..
::sigh::
God can do whatever he wants. Satan started disorder in God's Kingdom. Entropy is disorder by definition.
Nope. Your claim is that physicality itself is sin, and the result of sin.
Whereas Scripture states that God saw His creation as good, and after woman was made, very good
Decoherence causes physicality. Decoherence is disorder of Coherence. God's Kingdom is Coherent.
So the opposite occurs. But in this scenario, until Judgement and sin itself is cast into the Lake of Fire, Reality is a Realm of Decoherence. By definition only, Agreed!
So PittsburgJoe,
You think Adam and Eve were only particles originally?
Now, I see where the Big Bang and the sin particle is all lining up and connecting.
Why would animal clothing, which obviously the animals are physical before Adam/Eve make them become physical?
How would particles merge and mesh and become intwined like DNA so the non mattered particles are like the inward parts when the skins of clothing were wrapped around them and they become one being, homo sapien?
You think Adam and Eve were only particles originally?
Now, I see where the Big Bang and the sin particle is all lining up and connecting.
Why would animal clothing, which obviously the animals are physical before Adam/Eve make them become physical?
How would particles merge and mesh and become intwined like DNA so the non mattered particles are like the inward parts when the skins of clothing were wrapped around them and they become one being, homo sapien?
I didn't say that about the skin. Our heavenly bodies will be more than physical. We will be coherent matter waves. We will not be physically unique ..we will not be able to be about ourselves ..we won't be able to sin.
I can see this view.
But, I don't understand how Adam and Eve were connected to this realm?
We became connected at original sin ..fallen physical history caught up to Adam and Eve eating the apple.
Radioactive particles used the double slit will not decay in flight. There won't be multiple registers on the final panel. That means matter waves do not age. That means physical history is for Decoherent Locality.
Age is the history of being local, decoherent, physical, and fallen.
An age to being real to this fallen condition.
An age to being real to this fallen condition.
In the [Realm] you are discussing, this very well could be both a plausible and viable viewpoint of what is factually happening. But the original sin began with Satan, well before Genesis 1:1 took place (took place as when it happened/not when it was written). Sin happened in the Realm of Heaven long before God spoke the Universe into existence. And since we know Creation was how we read it in the Torah, we know evolution is false.
1. Sin originated in another Realm other than our own Universe.
2. God speaking Life into existence does not equal a Big Bang.
3. God's own Version of His Creation erases the idea of evolution.
These three reasons alone dispute your suggestion.
But the main reason your theory is far left, where [Sin] factually originated from. The sin particle is Satan, not portions of annihilated energy connecting the entire Universe.
Sin originated in a completely separate and different [Realm] than what connects to us directly, the Universe and our Planet we exist in.
So decoherence and retrocasuality do have a proper place in all things, but it does not exist in the Realm of Sin.
After all, Decoherence and Retrocasuality Exist in our Realm where we all originated from.
Sin originated from another completely separated Realm.
Therefore, this conversation is illogical at best!
1. Sin originated in another Realm other than our own Universe.
2. God speaking Life into existence does not equal a Big Bang.
3. God's own Version of His Creation erases the idea of evolution.
These three reasons alone dispute your suggestion.
But the main reason your theory is far left, where [Sin] factually originated from. The sin particle is Satan, not portions of annihilated energy connecting the entire Universe.
Sin originated in a completely separate and different [Realm] than what connects to us directly, the Universe and our Planet we exist in.
So decoherence and retrocasuality do have a proper place in all things, but it does not exist in the Realm of Sin.
After all, Decoherence and Retrocasuality Exist in our Realm where we all originated from.
Sin originated from another completely separated Realm.
Therefore, this conversation is illogical at best!