Less well-known Rapture verses. The case for the Rapture is compelling.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
How is it supposed to read?
Earth reaped of ripe fruit?
Jesus on a cloud?
After 144 k are in heaven as firstfruits?
Of course, those familiar with Scripture know that 1 Cor 15:23 says that Jesus is the "firstfruits". That's one, not 144K.

Looking forward to your take on the facts that I've shared with you.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,241
1,981
113
There's no definite article ('the') in 1Cor15:23 before the word "firstfruit":

1 Corinthians 15:23 Greek Text Analysis (biblehub.com)


Also, James 1:18 says, "a KIND of firstfruit" / "a CERTAIN firstfruit"...

... and Lev23 mentions TWO distinct "firstfruit" (regarding TWO distinct harvests).





In Rev14:4, re: the 144,000, the wording parallels the SECOND of those TWO "firstfruit" (i.e. the "WHEAT harvest," Lev23:17) and there it speaks of "TWO loaves" and "baken WITH LEAVEN"...

... this is consistent with all other of the timing / SEQUENCE issues I've pointed out in past posts.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
There's no definite article ('the') in 1Cor15:23 before the word "firstfruit":
1 Corinthians 15:23 Greek Text Analysis (biblehub.com)
Is there a point to be made here about lack of the definite article?

Also, James 1:18 says, "a KIND of firstfruit" / "a CERTAIN firstfruit"...
A point? And how does this have any relevance to the resurrection/glorification of believers?

... and Lev23 mentions TWO distinct "firstfruit" (regarding TWO distinct harvests).
OK, according to biblestudytools.com these are the subheading of the chapter:
Appointed festivals
Sabbath
Passover and festival of unleavened bread
Offering the firstfruits
Festival of weeks
Festival of trumpets
Day of Atonement
Festival of Tabernacles

So these are all the verses under "firstfruits"

Offering the Firstfruits
9 The LORD said to Moses,

10 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘When you enter the land I am going to give you and you reap its harvest, bring to the priest a sheaf of the first grain you harvest.

11 He is to wave the sheaf before the LORD so it will be accepted on your behalf; the priest is to wave it on the day after the Sabbath.
12 On the day you wave the sheaf, you must sacrifice as a burnt offering to the LORD a lamb a year old without defect,
13 together with its grain offering of two-tenths of an ephah of the finest flour mixed with olive oil—a food offering presented to the LORD, a pleasing aroma—and its drink offering of a quarter of a hin of wine.
14You must not eat any bread, or roasted or new grain, until the very day you bring this offering to your God. This is to be a lasting ordinance for the generations to come, wherever you live.

I see nothing here that is relevant to 1 Cor 15:23. So, what is your point by bringing Lev 23 up?

In Rev14:4, re: the 144,000, the wording parallels the SECOND of those TWO "firstfruit" (i.e. the "WHEAT harvest," Lev23:17) and there it speaks of "TWO loaves" and "baken WITH LEAVEN"...
And?? The point, please.

... this is consistent with all other of the timing / SEQUENCE issues I've pointed out in past posts.
Well, you're going to have to actually connect the dots.

Since none of the verses cited in your post are relevant to 1 Cor 15:23 and Christ being the "firstfruits" in regard to glorification, yo've not made any coherent point.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,241
1,981
113
Lev 23:11 -

Berean Study Bible
And he shall wave the sheaf before the LORD so that it may be accepted on your behalf; the priest is to wave it on the day after the Sabbath.

Young's Literal Translation
then he hath waved the sheaf before Jehovah for your acceptance; onthe morrow of the sabbath doth the priest wave it.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
He will wave the sheaf before the LORD so that you may be accepted; the priest is to wave it on the day after the Sabbath.

New American Standard Bible
He shall wave the sheaf before the LORD for you to be accepted; on the day after the sabbath the priest shall wave it.

King James Bible
And he shall wave the sheaf before the LORD, to be accepted for you: on the morrow after the sabbath the priest shall wave it.


I'm saying that ^ is what Jesus did, after He had told MM about His "[active] I ASCEND" (John 20:17) and had earlier talked about His "[active] I GO TO THE FATHER" (John 13:33,36; 14:2,3,4; 14:28; 16:5-7,16,19,20,21-22,28 [17:11]), which I am saying He did on the very day of His "resurrection"-1Cor15:20 (that is, ON FIRSTFRUIT, per Lev23:10-12 ^ )... [the FIRST ascension before the "40-day" LATER VISIBLE ascension in Acts 1]


...not speaking of His LATER VISIBLE ascension in Acts 1 (which is the manner in which He will RETURN to the earth King of kings, openly manifest, Rev19 [/ 2Th2:8b "the APPEARANCE/MANIFESTATION of His coming/presence," in contrast to v.1, which is "OUR episynagoges UNTO HIM" UP THERE [IN THE AIR]--and no one else, at that point])
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Rev 14

1 I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads.

4 These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.


So plain.
Now tell me why the bible is wrong again.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
You can look in every postrib rapture workbook and never unpack rev 14.

Why????

Because to you it is
1) anti pretrib rapture FIRST
2) REFRAMING those rapture verses

So when it comes to depth ( bride/ groom components) those teachers are bankrupt.

Once the center of end times is on the table ( bride/groom and Heavens purposes) the ENTIRE SUBJECT TURNS ON A DIME.

The thing is, you have to kinda start over.


BTW
I never understood how the 144 k could be any firstfruits of any kind (they are not first of anything).

But thank you Jesus for the Holy Ghost.

The 144k are declared at the first miracle of Jesus.
.....at....a WEDDING.

They are the wine declared " the best is saved for last"

( They are firstfruit Jews)

You heard it here first ( no pun untended)

You will find nobody unpacking rev 14.
I am all alone in that chapter.
It is so very hidden.

And yet the biggest game changer of the entire deal.

THANK YOU JESUS
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Is there a point to be made here about lack of the definite article?


A point? And how does this have any relevance to the resurrection/glorification of believers?


OK, according to biblestudytools.com these are the subheading of the chapter:
Appointed festivals
Sabbath
Passover and festival of unleavened bread
Offering the firstfruits
Festival of weeks
Festival of trumpets
Day of Atonement
Festival of Tabernacles

So these are all the verses under "firstfruits"

Offering the Firstfruits
9 The LORD said to Moses,

10 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘When you enter the land I am going to give you and you reap its harvest, bring to the priest a sheaf of the first grain you harvest.

11 He is to wave the sheaf before the LORD so it will be accepted on your behalf; the priest is to wave it on the day after the Sabbath.
12 On the day you wave the sheaf, you must sacrifice as a burnt offering to the LORD a lamb a year old without defect,
13 together with its grain offering of two-tenths of an ephah of the finest flour mixed with olive oil—a food offering presented to the LORD, a pleasing aroma—and its drink offering of a quarter of a hin of wine.
14You must not eat any bread, or roasted or new grain, until the very day you bring this offering to your God. This is to be a lasting ordinance for the generations to come, wherever you live.

I see nothing here that is relevant to 1 Cor 15:23. So, what is your point by bringing Lev 23 up?


And?? The point, please.


Well, you're going to have to actually connect the dots.

Since none of the verses cited in your post are relevant to 1 Cor 15:23 and Christ being the "firstfruits" in regard to glorification, yo've not made any coherent point.
Dwm is looking at it backwards.

Firstfruits are pointing to something.

Firstfruits are not a fulfillment. They are ONLY a " type"

There are many many firstfruits. Bunches of them. Wheat,barley, and grapes are but 3 of many.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Of course, those familiar with Scripture know that 1 Cor 15:23 says that Jesus is the "firstfruits". That's one, not 144K.

Looking forward to your take on the facts that I've shared with you.
Rev 14 :
1 . And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads

4 . These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,241
1,981
113
Dwm is looking at it backwards.
Firstfruits are pointing to something.
Firstfruits are not a fulfillment. They are ONLY a " type"
There are many many firstfruits. Bunches of them. Wheat,barley, and grapes are but 3 of many.
How am I looking at it backwards?

I'm not saying the same thing you are saying about the 144,000 being "raptured" / "located in Heaven" (I believe they remain on the earth... same as the REST of that particular "harvest").

I *AM* saying there is more than ONE "harvest"... and that the 144,000 are "firstfruit" of the "WHEAT harvest," in which there are many more (not just the 144,000 of Israel) that participate in the "WHEAT harvest" at the time of His Second Coming to the earth (per Matt13:24,39,40,49-50 parallel Matt24:29-31/Isa27:12-13 and Matt25:31-34, etc... [both chpts here])



[to be clear, I do not believe "the Church which is His body" (ALL those saved "in this present age [singular]") are the "WHEAT harvest". No.; As I said, the "WHEAT" is harvested by means of a "tribulum"; whereas the EARLIER harvest, by means of "tossing INTO THE AIR"]
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
Lev 23:11 -
Berean Study Bible
And he shall wave the sheaf before the LORD so that it may be accepted on your behalf; the priest is to wave it on the day after the Sabbath.

Young's Literal Translation
then he hath waved the sheaf before Jehovah for your acceptance; onthe morrow of the sabbath doth the priest wave it.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
He will wave the sheaf before the LORD so that you may be accepted; the priest is to wave it on the day after the Sabbath.

New American Standard Bible
He shall wave the sheaf before the LORD for you to be accepted; on the day after the sabbath the priest shall wave it.

King James Bible
And he shall wave the sheaf before the LORD, to be accepted for you: on the morrow after the sabbath the priest shall wave it.


I'm saying that ^ is what Jesus did, after He had told MM about His "[active] I ASCEND" (John 20:17) and had earlier talked about His "[active] I GO TO THE FATHER" (John 13:33,36; 14:2,3,4; 14:28; 16:5-7,16,19,20,21-22,28 [17:11]), which I am saying He did on the very day of His "resurrection"-1Cor15:20 (that is, ON FIRSTFRUIT, per Lev23:10-12 ^ )... [the FIRST ascension before the "40-day" LATER VISIBLE ascension in Acts 1]
How in the world can anyone attach Lev 23:11 to either Jesus' "active" ascension or His being the "firstfruits".

Lev 23 is a chapter that covers festivals for the Jews .

...not speaking of His LATER VISIBLE ascension in Acts 1 (which is the manner in which He will RETURN to the earth King of kings, openly manifest, Rev19 [/ 2Th2:8b "the APPEARANCE/MANIFESTATION of His coming/presence," in contrast to v.1, which is "OUR episynagoges UNTO HIM" UP THERE [IN THE AIR]--and no one else, at that point])
Actually, Lev 23 wasn't speaking about ANY ascension, as you presume.

Again, ch 23 is about festivals in the OT.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
BTW
I never understood how the 144 k could be any firstfruits of any kind (they are not first of anything).

But thank you Jesus for the Holy Ghost.

The 144k are declared at the first miracle of Jesus.
.....at....a WEDDING.

They are the wine declared " the best is saved for last"
Well, you do seem to have a knack for connecting totally unrelated things.

You will find nobody unpacking rev 14.
I am all alone in that chapter.
It is so very hidden.
Apparently you are just so very smart.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
Firstfruits are pointing to something.
Where do you get such an idea?

Firstfruits are not a fulfillment. They are ONLY a " type"
Type of what, specifically?

There are many many firstfruits. Bunches of them. Wheat,barley, and grapes are but 3 of many.
OK, I see it now. By creating (constructing) the idea that a word "points to something" and are a "type" of something, the claimer is able to make up just about anything they want.

No dice. The "firstfruits" of Lev 23 are simply OFFERINGS made to the Lord, as prescribed by the Lord.

To use Lev 23 to try to explain anything else is ludicrous.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
Of course, those familiar with Scripture know that 1 Cor 15:23 says that Jesus is the "firstfruits". That's one, not 144K.

Looking forward to your take on the facts that I've shared with you.
Rev 14 :
1 . And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads
4 . These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.
So, what does this prove? As you said in your earlier post, "there are many many firstfruits".

So, how does Ref 14:4 relate to 1 Cor 15:23?

And, where are your comments about the facts I gave you?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,241
1,981
113
How in the world can anyone attach Lev 23:11 to either Jesus' "active" ascension or His being the "firstfruits".

Lev 23 is a chapter that covers festivals for the Jews .
I said, He did this (what I'd pointed out re: His FIRST ascension, 'I ASCEND') on the same day of His "RESURRECTION" (1Cor15:20)... you know, when He "rose again"... "from the dead"...

...but after He "rose again" and after He spoke with MM and said to her what He said (in John 20:17).

That day on the calendar is [also known as] "FIRSTFRUIT" (which is, 'on the morrow, following the sabbath').

Does that answer your question?




I believe Scripture indicates He not only "rose from the dead" that day ['resurrection'], but also did His "[ACTIVE] I ASCEND" that very same day (which is some "40 days" earlier than the LATER VISIBLE ascension of Acts 1)



[btw, I believe He was BORN on Tabernacles]

Actually, Lev 23 wasn't speaking about ANY ascension, as you presume.

Again, ch 23 is about festivals in the OT.
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
Oh oh! Dont tell me its the sunday worship gimmick? That'll never happen! People are getting less and less religious. Nobody gives a HOOT about no sunday OR saturday worship. Everything is open 24/7.
Remember 9/11? The churches were FULL for three solid weeks.

How religious do you think the world will become when Satan is allowed to unleash his global environmental, economic, and societal catastrophism on the planet, and then his false prophets preach from every pulpit that God's anger is upon us because of our sin and that we have to legislate morality in order to save ourselves from total destruction?

All throughout Earth's history, the devil has always sought to make laws contrary to God's law and then get God's people in trouble for not obeying his laws...and the Psalmist plainly states that in the last days, Satan is going to "frame mischief by a law".
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,241
1,981
113
Why do people try to connect literal baked bread, which are OFFERINGS to the Lord, called "firstfruits", to 1 Cor 15:23 which describes Jesus' glorification as being the "firstfruits" of resurrection??
To be clear, I did NOT "connect" those two ^ things you're saying I "connected". NO.



Instead, I said there are TWO mentions of "firstfruit" in Lev23:

--[1] in Lev23:10-12 (on FIRSTFRUIT, 'on the morrow, following the sabbath'--the very day of Jesus' 'RESURRECTION' ['resurrection ['to stand again]' connecting with 1Cor15:20] and ON which day He ALSO did His '[active] I ASCEND'); in this Lev23:10-12 passage, there are NO "baked loaves" being referred to here as being "waved" (as you suggested I said... but I did not state that);


--[2] in Lev23:17 (re: 'WHEAT harvest'; [connecting with Rev14:4 / re: 144,000]); this Lev23:17 passage says "TWO loaves" and "baken WITH LEAVEN"




And, again, I'm just saying, "WE / the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" are NOT the "WHEAT harvest" (harvested by means of a 'tribulum'--harvesting implement)--the "144,000" are "firstfruit" of THAT harvest.

The "WHEAT harvest" (pertaining to the 'TWO loaves' [<--here's the 'baked loaves' you mentioned] and 'baken WITH LEAVEN') comes after the EARLIER "harvest"... the one which is harvested by means of "tossing INTO THE AIR"... and here it is "the sheaf of the firstfruit" which is "waved" by the priest (not 'baked loaves' waved here);



I'm just trying to point out the "connections" that you've misunderstood regarding (and thus responded far afield from) my previous post.

Hope that helps... or at least helps the readers see what the intention of my post had been meant to lay down (rather than what you picked up, by it, instead = ) )...
There is no hidden meaning here, guys.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
How in the world can anyone attach Lev 23:11 to either Jesus' "active" ascension or His being the "firstfruits".

Lev 23 is a chapter that covers festivals for the Jews .
I said, He did this (what I'd pointed out re: His FIRST ascension, 'I ASCEND') on the same day of His "RESURRECTION" (1Cor15:20)... you know, when He "rose again"... "from the dead"...

...but after He "rose again" and after He spoke with MM and said to her what He said (in John 20:17).

That day on the calendar is [also known as] "FIRSTFRUIT" (which is, 'on the morrow, following the sabbath').

Does that answer your question?
Sorry, no. Where do you get the idea when He went to His Father after speaking to MM on THAT day, that is known as "first fruit"?

I believe Scripture indicates He not only "rose from the dead" that day ['resurrection'], but also did His "[ACTIVE] I ASCEND" that vry same day (which is some "40 days" earlier than the LATER VISIBLE ascension of Acts 1)
You keep repeating the "[ACTIVE] I ASCEND" but I don't recall any verse where that was spoken. Could you provide it?

[btw, I believe He was BORN on Tabernacles]
Is this signifiant? If so, please explain.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
Why do people try to connect literal baked bread, which are OFFERINGS to the Lord, called "firstfruits", to 1 Cor 15:23 which describes Jesus' glorification as being the "firstfruits" of resurrection??
To be clear, I did NOT "connect" those two ^ things you're saying I "connected". NO.
Well, it sure looked like it to me, with your emphasis on 2 firstfruits statement, and mentioning Lev 23. It is very hard following the points you are trying to make.

, I said there are TWO mentions of "firstfruit" in Lev23:

--[1] in Lev23:10-12 (on FIRSTFRUIT, 'on the morrow, following the sabbath'--the very day of Jesus' 'RESURRECTION' ['resurrection ['to stand again]' connecting with 1Cor15:20] and ON which day He ALSO did His '[active] I ASCEND'); in this Lev23:10-12 passage, there are NO "baked loaves" being referred to here as being "waved" (as you suggested I said... but I did not state that);

--[2] in Lev23:17 (re: 'WHEAT harvest'; [connecting with Rev14:4 / re: 144,000]); this Lev23:17 passage says "TWO loaves" and "baken WITH LEAVEN"
So, what is the significance of 2 mentions of firstfruit in Lev 23? How does ANYTHING in Lev 23 relate to end times??? You've not made any of that clear.

And, again, I'm just saying, "WE / the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" are NOT the "WHEAT harvest" (harvested by means of a 'tribulum'--harvesting implement)--the "144,000" are "firstfruit" of THAT harvest.
I don't know what you are talking about here. Why even discuss a "wheat harvest", and is there a different harvest?

Please explain clearly.

The "WHEAT harvest" (pertaining to the 'TWO loaves' [<--here's the 'baked loaves' you mentioned] and 'baken WITH LEAVEN') comes after the EARLIER "harvest"... the one which is harvested by means of "tossing INTO THE AIR"... and here it is "the sheaf of the firstfruit" which is "waved" by the priest (not 'baked loaves' waved here);
What does any of this have to do with end times???

Who cares about 2 loaves and how it's harvested? You haven't explained anything.

I'm just trying to point out the "connections" that you've misunderstood regarding (and thus responded far afield from) my previous post.
Well, from my questions here, it is obvious that you still haven't made any "connections" between Lev 23 and end times.