Why Daniel's 70th week must be in the future
- Thread starter Nehemiah6
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Lol. I should say.
Anyhow, in your crazy exegesis the Temple is rebuilt by the end of the 69th week, where we pause the video.....for 2000 years
When we come back we have 7 years in which to destroy the Temple and then reconstruct it and anoint the Holy of Holies.
Do you not ever tire of this nonsense?
Anyhow, in your crazy exegesis the Temple is rebuilt by the end of the 69th week, where we pause the video.....for 2000 years
When we come back we have 7 years in which to destroy the Temple and then reconstruct it and anoint the Holy of Holies.
Do you not ever tire of this nonsense?
I mean what you are saying is so bonkers it defies belief.
If it was what you (aka King David of Israel) think, then
the anointing of the Holy of Holies took place circa 519BC at the reconstruction of the Temple.
Although this is not mentioned by Ezra and so is disqualified from being the prophetic fulfillment.
But then I know a lot of you run the from a later command 457BC? but this is all so tortured and crazy it is hard to take it seriously enough to debate. You are in fact saying
'From the command to rebuild Jerusalem 70 weeks AND A 2000 YEAR GAP are required to ......AND TO DESTROY THE TEMPLE AND THEN REBUILD IT, and then to anoint the Holiest ....
If it was what you (aka King David of Israel) think, then
the anointing of the Holy of Holies took place circa 519BC at the reconstruction of the Temple.
Although this is not mentioned by Ezra and so is disqualified from being the prophetic fulfillment.
But then I know a lot of you run the from a later command 457BC? but this is all so tortured and crazy it is hard to take it seriously enough to debate. You are in fact saying
'From the command to rebuild Jerusalem 70 weeks AND A 2000 YEAR GAP are required to ......AND TO DESTROY THE TEMPLE AND THEN REBUILD IT, and then to anoint the Holiest ....
"FROM" and "UNTO the Messiah prince" is "7 Weeks [/Sevens] and 62 Weeks [/Sevens]"... AFTER which is the "CUT OFF" thing (re: Him)... and then the 70ad things are next in the SEQUENCE [/passage]... and the text still hasn't yet come to the "FOR ONE WEEK [7 years]" part, see... It's a SEQUENTIAL passage (agreeing with all other passages on this Subject, in THIS SAME SEQUENCE, elsewhere in Scripture 
)
)-
1
- Show all
E
1. Your arguments make no sense, especially since history does not agree
2. church fathers? When did John and Peter and James believe anything else? Even Paul knew when the time of the gentile was finished all Isreal would be saved
3. prophesy is linear, when you look at it straight up. Many times when you turn it sideways you see events are sequential in order. But their are valleys or gaps in between individual events of years. The best example being when Jesus read from a prophet and said today is that day, he stopped mid prophecy, the rest of that prophecy has yet to be fulfilled. Yet reading it, you would think it all happened at the same time
dan 9 is about Israel, Jerusalem and the temple. It’s not about the church, it’s not about the messiah, it’s about what Gabriel said it was about
dan 9 24 “Seventy [t]weeks have been decreed for your people and your holy city,
there is the opening statement, there is the context. It is ALL about those two items (you can add the temple since the temple is built, destroyed, then a new temple is defiled by an idol) to make it about anything else is to take the prophecy out of context
since NON of the things which are said about Daniels people and holy city have been fulfilled. Dan 9 is not fulfilled
thats ALL we need to know
we don’t twist it, add to it, make it about something other than Israel or Jerusalem or the temple, only because our belief system does not want it to be about those things,
2. church fathers? When did John and Peter and James believe anything else? Even Paul knew when the time of the gentile was finished all Isreal would be saved
3. prophesy is linear, when you look at it straight up. Many times when you turn it sideways you see events are sequential in order. But their are valleys or gaps in between individual events of years. The best example being when Jesus read from a prophet and said today is that day, he stopped mid prophecy, the rest of that prophecy has yet to be fulfilled. Yet reading it, you would think it all happened at the same time
dan 9 is about Israel, Jerusalem and the temple. It’s not about the church, it’s not about the messiah, it’s about what Gabriel said it was about
dan 9 24 “Seventy [t]weeks have been decreed for your people and your holy city,
there is the opening statement, there is the context. It is ALL about those two items (you can add the temple since the temple is built, destroyed, then a new temple is defiled by an idol) to make it about anything else is to take the prophecy out of context
since NON of the things which are said about Daniels people and holy city have been fulfilled. Dan 9 is not fulfilled
thats ALL we need to know
we don’t twist it, add to it, make it about something other than Israel or Jerusalem or the temple, only because our belief system does not want it to be about those things,
-
1
- Show all
"FROM" and "UNTO the Messiah prince" is "7 Weeks [/Sevens] and 62 Weeks [/Sevens]"... AFTER which is the "CUT OFF" thing (re: Him)... and then the 70ad things are next in the SEQUENCE [/passage]... and the text still hasn't yet come to the "FOR ONE WEEK [7 years]" part, see... It's a SEQUENTIAL passage (agreeing with all other passages on this Subject, in THIS SAME SEQUENCE, elsewhere in Scripture )
)