If you are asking whether Christians believe that the Bible is the inerrant word of God, the answer is yes, most do. We sometimes see discussions about fallible manifestations of scripture (e.g. transcription errors in some editions or poor translations) but generally it is considered an axiom.
It would be unusual to see a 100% literal interpretation of scripture especially when there are explicit instances of simile, parable and descriptions that are strongly metaphoric. Is it possible to have an internally consistent interpretation that the Bible is 100% literal? Maybe. That would require testing. E.g. in John 6:35 when Jesus says "I am the bread of life", perhaps there is some interpretation with Eucharist bread where this could be literally interpreted. It would likely be an unusual interpretation.
If we are just talking about scripture as the inerrant word of God, we are still left with possible differences in interpretation. First, logically we should establish which interpretations are consistent with scripture. When we discover multiple interpretations that work by themselves but contradict eachother, we then have to determine which interpretations we find to be the most compelling.