What are you thoughts on Annihilation?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Laura798

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,716
593
113
Lady.....your false doctrine has been wrecked. Its over.
CV5, we all know you aren't reading anything we wrote--and I for one am beginning to suspect you are some sort of ETC algorithm that some hacker infected this forum with... that keeps repeating the same thing...over and over again.:rolleyes:
 

Laura798

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,716
593
113
This statement is not cohesive and makes no sense!

If hypothetically a man does this he deserves all the earthly laws can give him then all heavens punishment.

There is NO EXCUSE!
Furthermore I'm wondering if you do not know how to have a conversation.
You belittled Rayzor for disoriented thinking.......this isn't so good either.


Not picking a fight just don't get you.

That was not belittling-- I said "disordered' , not disoriented --in what he types--it is not coherent. I don't think anyone would say I was belittling him.

And Gardenias --I can't make sense of your response. I gave an analogy that was very straightforward--if we think a human horrible for torturing someone else, how much worse is it to say that God would do far worse? Also, the worst punishment that our earthly laws have is DEATH. Only evil people use torture as a form of punishment.
 

Gardenias

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2020
2,281
1,119
113
U.S.A.
CV5, we all know you aren't reading anything we wrote--and I for one am beginning to suspect you are some sort of ETC algorithm that some hacker infected this forum with... that keeps repeating the same thing...over and over again.:rolleyes:


Just inquiring here not negatively either.
Are you by chance on the spectrum.
Please do not get upset, I'm asking to get a better understanding of your thinking patterns.
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,679
113
The fact remains that scripture nowhere teaches annihilation
Do any of these scriptures say eternal torment? Yes or no will be fine.

Matthew 10:28
28And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell

John 3:16
16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

Romans 2:7
7To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:

Romans 6:23
23For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

2 Thessalonians 1:9
9Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;

Philippians 3:18-19
18(For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: 19Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things.)

Hebrews 10:26-27
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, 27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

Hebrews 10:39
39But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.

James 4:12
12There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?

2 Peter 3:7
7But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

Revelation 20:14-15
14And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Psalm 1:16
6For the LORD knoweth the way of the righteous: but the way of the ungodly shall perish.

Psalm 37:20
20But the wicked shall perish, and the enemies of the LORD shall be as the fat of lambs: they shall consume; into smoke shall they consume away.

Psalm 92:7
7that though the wicked sprout like grass, and all evildoers flourish, they will be forever destroyed.

Ezekiel 18:20
20The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
 

Laura798

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,716
593
113
Hi Laura!

The fact remains that scripture nowhere teaches annihilation, period. The main on-going problem with this, is because people don't understand the meaning of death in God's word, because they don't study it. Life and death are both eternal conscious states of existence based on an individuals state of being with God. For those who are in Christ, they have been reconciled to God through faith in His Son, having forgiveness of sin and eternal life. For those who do not believe, they simply remain condemned. And if they die in that state, then their record is sealed. Consider the following scripture:

"And they (wicked) will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” - Matt.25:46

The word "aionios" which is defined as " without end, never to cease, everlasting" is used for both the wicked and the righteous in the verse above and therefore must retain the same meaning. As an example, if you say that eternal punishment for the wicked refers to annihilation, then for those who are in Christ, would also have to mean temporary eternal life. The word has to mean the same for both. So, since eternal/aionios life is never ending, then eternal/aionios punishment for the wicked must also be never ending. The word cannot mean unending for one and temporary for the other. By the way, in order for a person to experience eternal punishment, one would have to be existing. You people need to start listening and considering that there people whom the Holy Spirit reveals this information to and stop supporting thosee false teachings.



"And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, and books were opened."

There will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked where both groups will receive indestructible bodies. The righteous for eternal life in kingdom of God. But for the wicked, an indestructible body mete for their never ending punishment. If you will notice, even after the unrighteous dead are resurrected at the great white throne judgment, they are still referred to as "the dead" which is in reference to their state of being with God, i.e. they are dead in the sins to Him. Then there is the following:

==============================================================
A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: “If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives its mark on their forehead or on their hand, 10they, too, will drink the wine of God’s fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. They will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb. 11And the smoke of their torment will rise for ever and ever. There will be no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and its image, or for anyone who receives the mark of its name.” < This is clearly figurative language as hell and hades are both thrown into the lake of fire--which the Angel states FOUR times IS the Second DEATH> That is why it is figurative--Hades and Hell are not Matter!

In order for a person to be tormented in the presence of the holy angels and the Lamb, one would have to be existing. It also states that they will be tormented and will have no rest day and night, which again infers ongoing existence.

Why do people continue to buy into the false teachings that are out there?

Please go thru this post--you are responding without looking at the voluminous verses we posted that say LITERALLY the end of the unbeliever is DEATH / DESTRUCTION. Note too the these words are interchangeable: Eternal Fire/Eternal Punishment/Eternal Destruction-- words ending in 'ment' and 'tion' are not ongoing they are FINAL.

Again, if you say ETC is the punishment for sin then you are saying Christ did not pay the penalty in full by his DEATH. That He is or will be in ETERNAL CONSCIOUS TORMENT if THAT is the punishment and not death.
 

Diakonos

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2019
1,373
432
83
30
Anacortes, WA
And now Diakonos, you show your true colors...the only coffin you've nailed is your own.
I'm referring to Ecclesiastes 12. I don't think you understand the joke. Please stick to our private conversations if it's in the same thread. Thank you.
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
Please go thru this post--you are responding without looking at the voluminous verses we posted that say LITERALLY the end of the unbeliever is DEATH / DESTRUCTION. Note too the these words are interchangeable: Eternal Fire/Eternal Punishment/Eternal Destruction-- words ending in 'ment' and 'tion' are not ongoing they are FINAL.

Again, if you say ETC is the punishment for sin then you are saying Christ did not pay the penalty in full by his DEATH. That He is or will be in ETERNAL CONSCIOUS TORMENT if THAT is the punishment and not death.
Until you understand the scriptural meaning of death, your conclusions will always be in error.

You and others are a part of the problem by supporting these false teachings
 

Laura798

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,716
593
113
Just inquiring here not negatively either.
Are you by chance on the spectrum.
Please do not get upset, I'm asking to get a better understanding of your thinking patterns.
Funny. I was going to ask you the same thing, but realized that would really be a mean thing to say, so thought the better of it.:mad:


"Like one who grabs a dog by the ears is a passerby who meddles in a quarrel not his own. Like a madman shooting firebrands and deadly arrows, so is the man who deceives his neighbor and says, “I was only joking!”…" --Proverbs 26:18-19
 

Laura798

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,716
593
113
I'm referring to Ecclesiastes 12. I don't think you understand the joke. Please stick to our private conversations if it's in the same thread. Thank you.

Here's an idea Diakonos--since there are1000+ post do what I do. I put the person's name at the top. Also I see at least two people who have responded to you that were not the person you were addressing--funny how you have to single me out for correction. :censored: PS when you're looking at multiple posts it can appear it is a general post, not to a particular individual--does that make sense?
 

Laura798

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,716
593
113
Until you understand the scriptural meaning of death, your conclusions will always be in error.

You and others are a part of the problem by supporting these false teachings

One thing that stands out like a sore thumb is ETC'ers do NOT investigate for themselves the scriptures and they are arrogant in their manner of speaking--they PUT ON the scriptures--Eiseges--what they have been taught by their denominations. They do not practice Exegesis--that is what is the author truly saying?
 

Laura798

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,716
593
113
One thing that stands out like a sore thumb is ETC'ers do NOT investigate for themselves the scriptures and they are arrogant in their manner of speaking--they PUT ON the scriptures--Eiseges--what they have been taught by their denominations. They do not practice Exegesis--that is what is the author truly saying?
And don't you understand that WE BELIEVE because the bible says the wages of sin is DEATH ---repeatedly. Death means DEATH.

We believe you are the ones who believe in a pagan myth.
 

Gardenias

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2020
2,281
1,119
113
U.S.A.
Funny. I was going to ask you the same thing, but realized that would really be a mean thing to say, so thought the better of it.:mad:


"Like one who grabs a dog by the ears is a passerby who meddles in a quarrel not his own. Like a madman shooting firebrands and deadly arrows, so is the man who deceives his neighbor and says, “I was only joking!”…" --Proverbs 26:18-19



Well you are NOT funny and I seriously doubt you just spoke the truth about having the same thought!
God will reveal what we think is hidden!
If this is going to be your attitude then I can no longer converse with you!
 

Laura798

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,716
593
113
Well you are NOT funny and I seriously doubt you just spoke the truth about having the same thought!
God will reveal what we think is hidden!
If this is going to be your attitude then I can no longer converse with you!
You didn't catch the sarcasm? You can be so mean and you are so blind to it. Asking if I was on the 'spectrum' was terrible. No decent person would ask anyone that--not even someone they knew well. :(
 

Diakonos

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2019
1,373
432
83
30
Anacortes, WA
What a day is is defined by the context of the passages of Genesis 1 and 2
"the context of Genesis 1 and 2 uses the word Yom to define a ~12 hour period "
I already told you that Genesis 2:4 is the transition from one huge context to the next. This is It is the first transition of the 12 major divisions in the book of Genesis [2:4, 5:1, 6:9, 10:1, 11:10, 11:27, 25:12, 19, 36:1, 9, 37:2]).

In this context, yes that is quite clear. There's no reason to introduce an alternative definition of yom in Genesis 1 and 2, where it is already being defined as day/night, such as one from Zechariah
So you believe that yom always means a 24-hour day and never means anything else in the Bible?
Romans 5 is about spiritual death and eternal life by Christ Jesus our Lord.
Again, you're lumping together contexts that are different. chapter 4:1-5:13 concerns justification by faith, while chapters 5:14-8:39 concerns the sanctification of the saints. The context shift happens halfway through Romans chapter 5. The latter section of the chapter is the results of the former section.
Jesus' death is typologically linked to Adam's death (Rom 5:14) Read it.
If your appeal to this chapter interprets Adam's death as spiritual, then you have to say that Jesus died spiritually too.
 

Gardenias

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2020
2,281
1,119
113
U.S.A.
Gardenias is saying" I don't suffer fools lightly"



Don't start accusing I called NO one a fool!
 

Gardenias

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2020
2,281
1,119
113
U.S.A.
@Laura798 .
I am sorry for hurting your feelings and I never intend to be mean.
I am very blunt in what I believe and what I say.
I find people,all people to be God's most unique and interesting creation.

Maybe you are sensitive where I am blunt and it might be good to just pass and repass with one another instead of engaging.

Truce
 

Laura798

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,716
593
113
You didn't catch the sarcasm? You can be so mean and you are so blind to it. Asking if I was on the 'spectrum' was terrible. No decent person would ask anyone that--not even someone they knew well.:(
The difference between us is that if someone cal
@Laura798 .
I am sorry for hurting your feelings and I never intend to be mean.
I am very blunt in what I believe and what I say.
I find people,all people to be God's most unique and interesting creation.

Maybe you are sensitive where I am blunt and it might be good to just pass and repass with one another instead of engaging.

Truce

Truce. And apology accepted. I appreciate it.



" Be kind and compassionate to one another, forgiving each other, just as in Christ God forgave you."--Ephesians 4:32
 

Diakonos

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2019
1,373
432
83
30
Anacortes, WA
I see at least two people who have responded to you that were not the person you were addressing
I'm fine responding to people that I don't already have an ongoing conversation with. But if I already have an ongoing conversation, then I only prefer to respond if its a direct quote of my own comment to them.

I would not respond to this:
1635384972891.png

While I would respond to this:
1635384979211.png

Do you understand now?


One reason for this is that it's easy to lose track of which posts have been responded to. So if there are many separate replies from the same person, there's a good chance I will miss something and your comment will float off in the void

Another reason is that if we are having two or more conversations at the same time, one of us might accidentally respond to the other conversation unintentionally, which leads to confusion and when one of us want to reference the conversation later, its impossible to know where the commenter intended to respond to when they make that mistake.

Another reason is that many doctrinal conversations are systematic, meaning certain things need to be agreed on before moving further in a subject. If I am having a conversation with another person (let's call them John), and he and I have already established much common ground earlier in the discussion, then he and I are equipped for a profitable conversation.

(hypothetically) Imagine that you and I are also having a discussion in the same thread but about a different aspect of the main topic. And you and I haven't established as much common ground as I have with John. This means that our conversation isn't ready to go to the level that John and I are having (or vice versa).

So if you interfere with my conversation with John but we are not ready to have that part of the conversation yet, then I am forced to answer the response differently. He might see my response to you and think it's the answer I would give him (but it's not). So he then responds to this new off branch I had to create to answer you.

You may or may not understand where I am coming from, but it's the best I can explain over text. That being said, please just have one coherent conversation with me per thread, not a bunch of mini conversations.

Please and thank you.
 

Laura798

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,716
593
113
I'm fine responding to people that I don't already have an ongoing conversation with. But if I already have an ongoing conversation, then I only prefer to respond if its a direct quote of my own comment to them.

I would not respond to this:
View attachment 232574

While I would respond to this:
View attachment 232575

Do you understand now?


One reason for this is that it's easy to lose track of which posts have been responded to. So if there are many separate replies from the same person, there's a good chance I will miss something and your comment will float off in the void

Another reason is that many doctrinal conversations are systematic, meaning certain things need to be agreed on before moving further in a subject. If I am having a conversation with another person (let's call them John), and he and I have already established much common ground earlier in the discussion, then he and I are equipped for a profitable conversation.

(hypothetically) Imagine that you and I are also having a discussion in the same thread but about a different aspect of the main topic. And you and I haven't established as much common ground as I have with John. This means that our conversation isn't ready to go to the level that John and I are having (or vice versa).

So if you interfere with my conversation with John but we are not ready to have that part of the conversation yet, then I am forced to answer the response differently. He might see my response to you and think it's the answer I would give him (but it's not). So he then responds to this new off branch I had to create to answer you.

You may or may not understand where I am coming from, but it's the best I can explain over text. That being said, please just have one coherent conversation with me per thread, not a bunch of mini conversations.

Please and thank you.


After your initial 'correction' I don't think I've had any conversations with you--I mistakenly responded to this last one thinking it was a general post.
I'm not sure why the lengthy explanation--I gave you an easy solution--you can simply type the person's name. Like I said, everyone is responding to everyone else, that's why I type the person's name--to make it clear I am speaking to them directly. :rolleyes: PS I'm looking back at the posting and you were responding to CV5 's sarcastic comment--not much of a theological discussion going on there....
 

arpon

Junior Member
Feb 24, 2017
73
25
8
33
Eternal life is not a QUANTITY of life. It is a QUALITY of life. A life of boundless infinite worship joy and blessed fellowship, being made perfectly righteous and holy and enjoying God forever. A life without trials tears torments or suffering.

Just the same way eternal death is not a quantity of death......:oops:. An existence with NEVERENDING trials tears torments and suffering.

Unredeemed humanity today is NOT enjoying true life......the Bible does say very clearly that we were BORN SPIRITUALLY DEAD......yet we walk and talk and eat etc. That's why Jesus stays in John chapter 3 that we must be born again.

Scripture is very clear on this which puts the final nail in the coffin of the HERESY of Annihilationism. Given the massive number of scriptures pertaining to the matter I really don't see what this debate is all about. Denial of the clear and obvious truth and facts is not a debate at all.

Beware because it appears that we have some Jehovah's Witnesses infiltrating this thread.
Its just my opinion, not more than that.
1) I know that there are verse about eternal torment. So it seems like there there are eternal punishment, But I don't know our father God would agree with our version of narration or not.
2) If the eternal torment is taken literally than It is not like suit with Gods character(Loving, Graceful towards all in any time).
** So Actually I don't know what is the correct answer- eternal torment or annihilation? But I do know God would prefer us to do the work of sharing gospel over that two. So I will work on that. :) thank you.