Steven Furtick

[HealthAndHappiness]

i'd pick better videos. we all know Anderson uses the Textus Receptus. which came directly from a practicing Catholic. if i ever thought Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Wesleyan, Pentecostal were teaching from a Catholic viewpoint, out of the same Bible minus the other Catholic Books, i would never go to Church again!

People can judge for themselves rather than have their faith in God's Word undermined.
Sounds to me like he's Mike Tyson in round #10 looking down at the mats at Steven Furtick saying, get up and fight like a man.
Furtick looking up all beat halfway to hell whimpering, " I am god almighty..." with his ESV in hand.

Here's the History of the Bible for those who enjoy the Truth!
☕🙂👍📖

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

People can judge for themselves rather than have their faith in God's Word undermined.
Sounds to me like he's Mike Tyson in round #10 looking down at the mats at Steven Furtick saying, get up and fight like a man.
Furtick looking up all beat halfway to hell whimpering, " I am god almighty..." with his ESV in hand.

Here's the History of the Bible for those who enjoy the Truth!
☕🙂👍📖

in another thread it was proven Anderson mislead people about the Jews. claiming they all go to Hell.

so far, the only one getting his lights knocked out is Anderson. and he is punching his own lights out.

so we have at least 1 Anderson False doctrine vs Furtick's False doctrine. i'd say the cards are even.

 

[Dirtman]

Does anyone know what's up with Steven Furtick? I was wondering if his denomination gave him a Vibram sole Boot to the back end or not. The reasons are that he became a Modalist or Oneness preacher. A denial of God as Father, Son and Holy Spirit; three distinct Persons, One God. I John 5:7
Instead they believe that God manifest Himself in three different modes either as Father Or as Son or as Holy Spirit at different given times. All due kindness to my Apostolic neighbors, that's not Baptist doctrine. Why not transfer his membership to the Apostolic denomination?
They probably wouldn't want him.

Some sites say that he's a Southern Baptist convention member, so perhaps they wanted his churches $ and kept it on board?

Oh BTW, he also thinks that he is God!

Steven Furball proclaims he's God Almighty.

https://www.kjv1611only.com/video/15false/Steven_Furtick_Blasphemy_I_Am_God_Almighty.mp4

Furtick's view on the Trinity

https://www.christianheadlines.com/...ying-the-traditional-view-of-the-trinity.html

He is a false teacher and isnt accountable to anyone but himself. Which is only part of the problem. The other part is that he has so many itchy ears that he appeals to that he will continue on. Even after his proclamation that " He is God". They will continue to make him rich, rather than discontinue him. (What do they call that these days? Cancelled.)

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

here the most important question. does Jakes and Furtick believe accepting Jesus as Lord God and Savior is the only way to God? i think they do. so how is this doctrine of theirs making them go to Hell? or, is that what Anderson said like he said about the Jews?

 

[Dirtman]

I personally would never say: "I am God almighty!" I don't care what supposed "true" meaning is behind it that makes it "okay." And in front of a listening audience? This is the kind of thing I said when I was in rebellion against God.

I think its what Satan was trying to do....put himself on the throne of God.

 

[Bluesproverb]

i'd pick better videos. we all know Anderson uses the Textus Receptus. which came directly from a practicing Catholic. if i ever thought Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Wesleyan, Pentecostal were teaching from a Catholic viewpoint, out of the same Bible minus the other Catholic Books, i would never go to Church again!

The Catholic church opposed the Greek Received Text, Textus Receptus. While the Protestant denominations are built upon it.

https://christianpublishinghouse.co...the-greek-text-behind-the-king-james-version/

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

The Catholic church opposed the Greek Received Text, Textus Receptus. While the Protestant denominations are built upon it.

https://christianpublishinghouse.co...the-greek-text-behind-the-king-james-version/

but there's a difference between the 350 AD Greek Codexes that Jerome used and the 1200 AD Latin revised Textus Receptus the KJV uses.

 

[Bluesproverb]

but there's a difference between the 350 AD Greek Codexes that Jerome used and the 1200 AD Latin revised Textus Receptus the KJV uses.

OK

 

[Bluesproverb]

People can judge for themselves rather than have their faith in God's Word undermined.
Sounds to me like he's Mike Tyson in round #10 looking down at the mats at Steven Furtick saying, get up and fight like a man.
Furtick looking up all beat halfway to hell whimpering, " I am god almighty..." with his ESV in hand.

Here's the History of the Bible for those who enjoy the Truth!
☕🙂👍📖

Why would YouTube make a video about the history of the Bible age restricted?

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Trinity Moments #11

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

😳 It's bad when he talks about context and then proves he doesn't understand what Jesus said in verse 7 sustains what he proclaimed in verse 6.

Explain what you mean.
What do you think verse 6 is talking about?

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

OK

Many critics of the Textus Receptus and the King James Version have similar concepts, believing that the Received Text and versions based upon it are corrupt and add 1000's of words, whereas the position of those who hold that the versions based upon the Textus Receptus is that modern versions omit from the sacred text.

the Textus Receptus has added 251 Verses.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Why would YouTube make a video about the history of the Bible age restricted?

Good question.
I just noticed that.
I guess that it was censored.
They probably put naked outlaw biker trannies as promoted videos, but not something so prohibited as the history of the Bible. Google would probably have lit the match on William Tyndale.
Maybe I can find a renegade channel that it slipped past.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Good question.
I just noticed that.
I guess that it was censored.
They probably put naked outlaw biker trannies as promoted videos, but not something so prohibited as the history of the Bible. Google would probably have lit the match on William Tyndale.
Maybe I can find a renegade channel that it slipped past.

maybe youtube is linking accounts of those who watch it. these are probably Christian so need to mark them for future events when it's time to hunt us down.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Many critics of the Textus Receptus and the King James Version have similar concepts, believing that the Received Text and versions based upon it are corrupt and add 1000's of words, whereas the position of those who hold that the versions based upon the Textus Receptus is that modern versions omit from the sacred text.

the Textus Receptus has added 251 Verses.

No, actually it is complete. It is the others that are missing verses and whole paragraphs.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

Here it is on another platform, UgeTube.


https://ugetube.com/watch/new-world-order-bible-versions_G8HFHPftBkaVKev.html

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

No, actually it is complete. It is the others that are missing verses and whole paragraphs.

since there's no literal papyrus for those added Verses, who decided they were missing and needed to be added?

and since there's no record of the papyrus, how do they know what the Verse said?

did they just make them up?

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

oh i see what they did. they did add to them and ERASED original Versions.

1 John 5:7-8 from 350 AD Greek Codex
7 For they that testify are three,
8 the Spirit, and the water, and the blood, and the three are one.


from the 1516 AD Textus Receptus
7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

there's literally a list of 251 Verses you just click and shows the difference in how they changed the "original" verse.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

It looks like Gooey shut down lots of channels and put age restrictions on others.
Let's see how this little one works. The resolution might be better.
(Works OK for me, but I'm 18

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

i showed this one earlier.

350 AD
Hebrews 1:3 who, being the effulgence of his glory and the exact image of his substance


1516 Textus Receptus:
"Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person


so they changed the words for i suppose their own purpose??