Doctrine of Unconditional Election
- Thread starter brightfame52
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Well, I don't know what to say about your comment. How can a Christian not believe that Christ
alone, who is clearly identified in the Bible as the Saviour, not be the one who saves in all possible ways,
not leaving anything to the recipient of His gift to fulfill to acquire it? That is the "school of thought" you
say is wrong. How can that not be the absolute foundation of the Bible?
alone, who is clearly identified in the Bible as the Saviour, not be the one who saves in all possible ways,
not leaving anything to the recipient of His gift to fulfill to acquire it? That is the "school of thought" you
say is wrong. How can that not be the absolute foundation of the Bible?
Faith is not a gift it is an open hand receiving the gift which is salvation.
Recognizing that a person is able to do nothing but accept the gift (through faith) does not make the Saviour less than who He is and what He has accomplished on the behalf of all humanity.
In fact heaven states there is rejoicing. This is what He wants.
When you make an argument faith is a gift, you have the problem of why does God not give this gift to everyone?
The typical Calvinist answer, they were not chosen and God is sovereign and He can do what He wants.
So basically God is elitist.
Recognizing that a person is able to do nothing but accept the gift (through faith) does not make the Saviour less than who He is and what He has accomplished on the behalf of all humanity.
In fact heaven states there is rejoicing. This is what He wants.
When you make an argument faith is a gift, you have the problem of why does God not give this gift to everyone?
The typical Calvinist answer, they were not chosen and God is sovereign and He can do what He wants.
So basically God is elitist.
-
1
- Show all
There are different types of love. But no, they cannot love as God does with agape love.
Unsaved people have natural abilities. They lack spirituality. They can walk...but not in the Spirit. They can talk...but not to God. They can love...but the love of God is not shed abroad in their hearts.
They operate only in the natural world.
Unsaved people have natural abilities. They lack spirituality. They can walk...but not in the Spirit. They can talk...but not to God. They can love...but the love of God is not shed abroad in their hearts.
They operate only in the natural world.
-
2
- Show all
Luke 18:
13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.
14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.
He went to his house justified AFTER he asked God for mercy.
Anyone has the capacity to believe the gospel.
13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.
14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.
He went to his house justified AFTER he asked God for mercy.
Anyone has the capacity to believe the gospel.
Elitist makes no sense because He is God and as such is sovereign and has the prerogative to choose how/whom He will.
Otherwise, grace simply cannot exist: true grace cannot exist in the absence of election - each requires the other.
Anything that someone needs to do to complement or to complete what Christ has already achieved, in effect, is saying
that you believe that Christ is not the Saviour. You can't have it both ways - He either fully is and anything short of that is that He is not.
Giving an "invitation" does not constitute a Saviour acting as a Saviour.
Otherwise, grace simply cannot exist: true grace cannot exist in the absence of election - each requires the other.
Anything that someone needs to do to complement or to complete what Christ has already achieved, in effect, is saying
that you believe that Christ is not the Saviour. You can't have it both ways - He either fully is and anything short of that is that He is not.
Giving an "invitation" does not constitute a Saviour acting as a Saviour.
It simply is completely true. Saying that a Saviour is a Saviour cannot be "skewed"
A Saviour MUST SAVE, period, otherwise His title would not be appropriate.
If becoming saved is based upon our choosing of Him, then beyond question, we would have saved ourselves - making us our
own saviour, not Christ. But we know the Bible is abundantly clear and unambitious in that Christ alone absolutely is the Savour
and that we are not.
A Saviour MUST SAVE, period, otherwise His title would not be appropriate.
If becoming saved is based upon our choosing of Him, then beyond question, we would have saved ourselves - making us our
own saviour, not Christ. But we know the Bible is abundantly clear and unambitious in that Christ alone absolutely is the Savour
and that we are not.
That means you don't believe Christ is the Saviour. Did Saul (Paul) avail himself of an offer from Christ of salvation to become saved, or did God just make it to happen to him? Did Saul say to God, "well thanks for your offer, Jesus, but I think I'll pass on it for now - maybe later"? A Saviour is truly a Saviour when He saves those who don't want His salvation, which, before becoming saved, none of us do, because we trust in ourselves and in our own works. By our unsaved nature, we believe that we can anoint ourselves as the kingmaker.
19 “So then, King Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the vision from heaven. 20 First to those in Damascus, then to those in Jerusalem and in all Judea, and then to the Gentiles, I preached that they should repent and turn to God and demonstrate their repentance by their deeds.
Paul makes it clear he made a choice.
-
1
- Show all
Sorry. I must have been referring to another thread. I was actually referring to Luke 15. It is a parable with 3 parts. The first is about the shepherd who gets the sheep, the second about the cleaning and lightening to find the coin, and lastly the prodigal that most are very familiar with.
The parable demonstrates that the entire godhead is part of salvation. The work of Christ in saving, the work of the Spirit in enlightening and cleansing, and then the application to the individual as the Father draws.
In your story of the publican, only the final step is shown.
I believe the other 2 would have been done before this. They simply aren't necessary to express in the story of the publican because God isn't explaining the outworking of salvation but what genuine repentance consists of. One was an outward show of piety. The other, an inward, spiritual reality.
The parable demonstrates that the entire godhead is part of salvation. The work of Christ in saving, the work of the Spirit in enlightening and cleansing, and then the application to the individual as the Father draws.
In your story of the publican, only the final step is shown.
I believe the other 2 would have been done before this. They simply aren't necessary to express in the story of the publican because God isn't explaining the outworking of salvation but what genuine repentance consists of. One was an outward show of piety. The other, an inward, spiritual reality.