Not reality

[Dino246]

What a long article of a person that denies the fossil record, due to his indoctrination.

You're a shining example of indoctrination yourself, Serk.

Please provide the evidence supporting your assertion that this person "denies the fossil record".

 

[Dino246]

What’s even more comical is he deems death didn’t exist at one point (as death had to come into the world due to humans disobeying and this was the consequences/punishment). But he has zero evidence death never existed. So he just has a figment like you

Fallacy: the absence of evidence for something does not mean that thing does not exist.

 

[Dino246]

No fossils are out of place. You should really learn about the geological column. All creatures have their designated period.

You really should learn about the anti-theistic origins of the current secular interpretations of the geologic column.

 

[Serk]

No; the Bible states that humans existed before death.

And that’s why it isn’t reality. As creatures died before humans. Humans didn’t bring death into the world. That’s just some words in a book you read.

 

[Serk]

Fallacy: the absence of evidence for something does not mean that thing does not exist.

Absence is the reason it doesn’t exist.

 

[Magenta]

And that’s why it isn’t reality. As creatures died before humans. Humans didn’t bring death into the world. That’s just some words in a book you read.

You read what you now believe. Do you come here for Christian fellowship? Obviously not. You won't last long. I'll say my good byes now... So long! Fare thee well!!!

 

[Serk]

You're a shining example of indoctrination yourself, Serk.

Please provide the evidence supporting your assertion that this person "denies the fossil record".

As he read some words in a book and accepts it, over what is clearly seen in reality. If you don’t think death existed before humans, then I suggest you look at creatures that have gone extinct before humans existed.

 

[Serk]

You read what you now believe. Do you come here for Christian fellowship? Obviously not. You won't last long. I'll say my good byes now... So long! Fare thee well!!!

I don’t go on beliefs, I go on evidence.

 

[JaumeJ]

It’s actually hilarious that no po


Try paintings.

Cave paintgs? Next will be try stratifications and fossils.

Why not go back to the big boom creation? Where did the original swirling center come from? Can't touch that, nope, no way. What was before that original mass of energy? No, can't touch tha teither.

What about all the unexplainable gaps in the theory of evolution? That either.

 

[Dino246]

As he read some words in a book and accepts it, over what is clearly seen in reality. If you don’t think death existed before humans, then I suggest you look at creatures that have gone extinct before humans existed.

You are confusing reality with some people's interpretation of evidence. They aren't the same thing.

No creature "went extinct" before humans existed. Your claim is based on the above-noted interpretation.

 

[Magenta]

I don’t go on beliefs, I go on evidence.

My beliefs are backed by firsthand evidence. Your evidence is second hand.

 

[Pilgrimshope]

There's an important adjunct to the fossil record that you have not mentioned, but which is absolutely critical to its use as evidence for anything: a timeline. Fossils don't come with a timeline; all they show is that creatures that once existed are now dead, and their remains preserved in rocks.

By the comments you've made, it appears that you assume the timeline offered by secular scientists. That timeline is rooted in the exclusion of any possible divine intervention. That's not science; it's bias.

Indeed to read it sounds like “first reject the Bible and what it says , and accept a scientific theory based upon examining Gods creation and explaining how it came about without God creating it. Lol or you humans are all dumb”

 

[Dino246]

I don’t go on beliefs, I go on evidence.

You are blind to your own assumptions.

 

[Magenta]

You are blind to your own assumptions.

But... but... he read it in a book!!!

 

[Serk]

You are confusing reality with some people's interpretation of evidence. They aren't the same thing.

No creature "went extinct" before humans existed. Your claim is based on the above-noted interpretation.

If you don’t even know creatures went extinct before humans. Then they would still exist today. Of course they don’t. Nothing about interpretation, but actual evidence.

 

[Serk]

My beliefs are backed by firsthand evidence. Your evidence is second hand.

It wouldn’t be a belief if you had evidence you would know.

 

[Dino246]

If you don’t even know creatures went extinct before humans. Then they would still exist today.

That does not follow.

 

[Magenta]

It wouldn’t be a belief if you had evidence you would know.

Ridiculous. We are not expected to believe without evidence.

You just happen to deny a lot of the evidence.

However, the Biblical record does not cease to exist just because you reject it.

 

[Magenta]

That does not follow.

He's illogical.

 

[JohnDB]

You’re post had literally nothing to do with my original post.

Actually it has everything to do with your original post and if you actually had the logic skills to understand this assertion of yours would be seen by you as laughable.
You claim that because the Bible doesn't include dinosaurs and their extinction before mankind existed that the Bible is fiction.

Then I explained that the Bible doesn't mention dinosaurs because it wasn't relevant to its purpose and intent.

But basically in more crass terms an equivalent demand is that since a modern cookbook explains how to cook that it should also explain how to cook using a wood stove when they have been out of favor for over 100 years now.

Yeah....
So I'm seriously questioning your logic skills due to your erroneous leaps of logic. And highly suggest that you consider that your conclusions are deeply flawed.